2020 Presidential Race

#79,653
#79,653
loggervol said:
No, he’s a truth over facts guy or girl or a they, them. I’m sorry I can’t remember all the proper ways to address a they, them liberal.
Click to expand...
Got an email from a person working for the UK Atomic Energy Authority yesterday.

The person’s name gave me no clue as to gender but she did provide her pronouns, much to my relief.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider and AM64
#79,655
#79,655
BowlBrother85 said:
Post #79,638, Short Bus.
Click to expand...
That is not what I am posting about, although that would be proven true by what I am posting about. I am posting about the claims of data analysts who claim to have parsed the data feed from election night and proven that Trump votes were given to Biden and tossed out altogether. It's across multiple software platforms, multiple states and even multiple congressional races.

I'm posting about the link I posted showing evidence of this live on CNN from election night coverage.

I'm posting about the fact that I literally downloaded the data and manually parsed sections of it to verify many of their claims, and they proved true. So, it's literally impossible for what I'm posting about to have been debunked because I literally proved it out myself.

If you'd taken the time to read what I've posted on the subject, you'd have seen the links to the data, the screenshots for those to whom the data just looks like jibberish, and the math I posted for those who can't get it all for themselves.

So, yes. I was convinced that you were talking from ignorance as soon as you claimed it had been debunked, because I have personally proven that it hasn't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volinsd, StarRaider and jp1
#79,656
#79,656
The claims: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/happening-calling-every-pede-to-/

You can literally start checking them for yourselves: https://static01.nyt.com/elections-...0-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json


Again, as a start, pay attention to PA updates 187 and 188. It's indisputable that over 17,000 Trump votes were given to Biden. He has a github with the data and his analysis scripts so you can run them yourselves. I don't plan to trust his data or scripts. I plan to write my own, run the analysis and compare the results to his.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#79,659
#79,659
Orange_Crush said:
The claims: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/happening-calling-every-pede-to-/

You can literally start checking them for yourselves: https://static01.nyt.com/elections-...0-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json


Again, as a start, pay attention to PA updates 187 and 188. It's indisputable that over 17,000 Trump votes were given to Biden. He has a github with the data and his analysis scripts so you can run them yourselves. I don't plan to trust his data or scripts. I plan to write my own, run the analysis and compare the results to his.
Click to expand...

Thedonald.win use to be r/thedonald, until it was banned for inciting violence and using hate speech. Using them as evidence of anything is unwise.
 
#79,662
#79,662
Orange_Crush said:
I am going directly to the Edison data from election night, just as the data analysts in question did. You can scrape them directly out of the NYT election night json feed.

Again... Sorry I assumed your motives, but you see what info like this receives around here.
Click to expand...
Yes, I'm looking at the raw data feed now. Shocked that it hasn't been taken down.
 
#79,663
#79,663
GoBigOrangeUT said:
Thedonald.win use to be r/thedonald, until it was banned for inciting violence and using hate speech. Using them as evidence of anything is unwise.
Click to expand...
I'll repeat myself. They have listed their claims, linked the data, and submitted the code from their process. You, me and everyone else is perfectly free to check their claims. And again, every one I've checked so far has proven true. It will take more time for me to check all of it, but it's checked out as I've spot-checked it.

Why bypass discussion of the facts to attack the messenger?
 
#79,664
#79,664
TechnoVol said:
Yes, I'm looking at the raw data feed now. Shocked that it hasn't been taken down.
Click to expand...

Check the example I gave to start. It should be simple enough to use PowerShell to convertfromjson, parse the numbers and log every update where a candidate's vote total decreased. That shouldn't happen, so would be the trigger you'd be looking for.
 
#79,665
#79,665
GoBigOrangeUT said:
But seriously @Orange_Crush, if you are claiming massive digital vote fraud, why wouldn’t they have utilized this in 2016? Mail-in ballots were the original boogeyman, but at least had an infinitesimally small degree of possibility to be used for fraud.
Click to expand...
Perhaps the code had not been perfected till after the 2016 election.
 
#79,667
#79,667
burntorangeVOLffle said:
THEY ARE THE SAME THING! 🤦‍♂️
Click to expand...

No, they aren’t, a absentee ballot is a ballot that the person has asked for and showed or given proof of who he is. Mail in ballots, anyone could’ve received them. No proof of registration or that the person is actually still alive.

Thank you for playing though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volinsd, FallBranchChick and AM64
#79,668
#79,668
Orange_Crush said:
I'll repeat myself. They have listed their claims, linked the data, and submitted the code from their process. You, me and everyone else is perfectly free to check their claims. And again, every one I've checked so far has proven true. It will take more time for me to check all of it, but it's checked out as I've spot-checked it.

Why bypass discussion of the facts to attack the messenger?
Click to expand...
Because logically it doesn’t make sense. The post in question was done yesterday. 24 hours of this “undeniable proof” and no word of it anywhere. Let’s assume the MSM is implicit, so they wouldn’t cover it anyway. But what about OANN? NewsMax? Those are pro-Trump. Why haven’t they picked it up? so far, literally the only place it’s shown up is a former reddit sub that was banned. Not even quarantined. Just banned outright.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohhbother
#79,670
#79,670
Check the example I gave to start. It should be simple enough to use PowerShell to convertfromjson, parse the numbers and log every update where a candidate's vote total decreased. That shouldn't happen, so would be the trigger you'd be looking for.
RavinDave said:
Perhaps the code had not been perfected till after the 2016 election.
Click to expand...

There's no guarantee it hadn't been used last election It's possible they underestimated Trump's popularity and didn't model the level of fraud they'd need. It's possible they didn't have the infrastructure set up to stop the counts like they did this time, so couldn't update the level of fraud as needed. It's possible they needed the choas of mail-in voting to overwhelm the system in order to affect this level of fraud.

Who knows? But you can't claim that votes weren't taken from Trump and digitally given to Biden. That's established fact now. It's just a matter of proving how prevalent it was or wasn't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RavinDave and StarRaider
#79,672
#79,672
GoBigOrangeUT said:
Because logically it doesn’t make sense. The post in question was done yesterday. 24 hours of this “undeniable proof” and no word of it anywhere. Let’s assume the MSM is implicit, so they wouldn’t cover it anyway. But what about OANN? NewsMax? Those are pro-Trump. Why haven’t they picked it up? so far, literally the only place it’s shown up is a former reddit sub that was banned. Not even quarantined. Just banned outright.
Click to expand...
They have picked up on it. I found it on one of the conservative media sites.

ETA: BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Analysis of Election Night Data from All States Shows MILLIONS OF VOTES Either Switched from President Trump to Biden or Were Lost -- Using Dominion and Other Systems
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, Bassmaster_Vol and StarRaider
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top