GoBigOrangeUT
Kind of hot in these rhinos
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2010
- Messages
- 12,564
- Likes
- 9,903
Your "several numbers guys" are not going to override the professional opinion of The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, who have already referred to the 2020 Presidential election as being, in their words: "The most secure election in history." This agency also added some very strong language to that assessment with this line:I know several numbers guys. One is a big time Biden supporter. They are all saying this looks bad.
I’ll wait to see how it turns out as it’s outside my area of expertise.
I will say that if it’s true then it’s going to be a major **** show. This wouldn’t flip the election to trump. It would invalidate it and we’d get to do it all over again.
Man let me te
lf only you knew how many times SECDEF Mattis lied to or disobey an order from Trump to prevent reckless dangerous actions. DoD officials are doing their jobs defending American national security interests and I hope they continue doing so for another 67 days.
We wouldn't do it again. My understanding is that state legislators would vote on our behalf.I know several numbers guys. One is a big time Biden supporter. They are all saying this looks bad.
I’ll wait to see how it turns out as it’s outside my area of expertise.
I will say that if it’s true then it’s going to be a major **** show. This wouldn’t flip the election to trump. It would invalidate it and we’d get to do it all over again.
That is not what I'm saying at all. Trump claimed a landslide victory in 2016. This dwarfs that landslide.So what you are saying is **** you middle america and your 70 million votes because we won and we'll do what we want?
It's always about bureaucracies. Bureaucracies aren't run by people at the top; they have their own agenda. If the bureaucracy's agenda coincides with elected officials and their representatives, then it appears they are subservient; if not, they say one thing and do another. Bureaucracy rules are all about preservation, growth, funding, etc - the published mission is secondary and way down the ladder.
You know it’s serious business from a reputable journalist when the headline is that it will “break liberals hearts”.Oh my. Is it too late to go back and change my vote to trump?? I voted for him initially but some chump in the voting center marked it out and wrote in Biden’s name for crying out loud!!
Yeah... I'm sure your assessment is more astute than that of The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, and it will be totally necessary to invalidate the results from "the most secure election in history,".We wouldn't do it again. My understanding is that state legislators would vote on our behalf.
Wow. You really don't read the posts you reply to, do you? Or is English a second language for you?Yeah... I'm sure your assessment is more astute than that of The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, and it will be totally necessary to invalidate the results from "the most secure election in history,".
"There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes or was in any way compromised."
How does a professional assessment following an investigation get any more clear than that?
Refuse to allow Biden access to necessary resources in regards to National security.
Man let me te
lf only you knew how many times SECDEF Mattis lied to or disobey an order from Trump to prevent reckless dangerous actions. DoD officials are doing their jobs defending American national security interests and I hope they continue doing so for another 67 days.
They probably don't want to be identified and terrorized by your people while they are at home.