2020 Presidential Race



The people elected or chosen to run elections aren't going to admit they don't know what they are doing or were hoodwinked by software and hardware vendors. Nobody is going to let charges of election fraud come to light unless they happen to be victims. Government has enough problem with apparent incompetency and misconduct to really let the cat out of the bag with respect to election fraud. That's third rail kind of territory - not even congressional graft is not in that rarefied atmosphere.
 
But..but...this can’t be correct. One of our resident programmers has already proven that votes were changed in Biden’s favor. Maybe he just hasn’t notified the authorities yet?
You mean that a poster on the politics forum of VolNation is pretending to know more about the United States system of elections than the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency does? But he is actually full of runny, wet $hit?

Say it isn't so.... it isn't so-o-o.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJimgo
And The Dept. of Homeland Security put out a statement this morning that stated they see nothing fraudulent in any state they have seen.
Could you link that for us? I haven't seen any such statement from the DHS. I've seen a statement, signed by select members of different counsels and agencies that some have claimed is an official DHS statement on the matter.

Again, I may have missed what you're talking about, so thank you in advance for the link.
 
You mean that a poster on the politics forum of VolNation is pretending to know more about the United States system of elections than the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency does? But he is actually full of runny, wet $hit?

Say it isn't so.... it isn't so-o-o.

I would again invite you both to go back and read my posts. If you had slowed down and read what I actually wrote, you wouldn't look so terribly ignorant.

ETA: Sorry to do this to you guys, but this is one of many posts that blows your pearl clutching outrage out of the water. Literally all I did was report the claims, check the claims, and report my findings with the caveat that there may be perfectly innocent explanations.

Like I said, they may be able to account for it. There may be a perfectly innocent explanation for the losses. But the bare numbers are bearing it out. There were MASSIVE losses in the data.

Hit me up and we'll get together. I'll walk you through the data, walk you through my code, show you the output, and you can make up your own mind, brother.

BB, you are posting like a jilted school girl. I respectfully recommend that you take the night off and get yourself together.
 
Last edited:
I know several numbers guys. One is a big time Biden supporter. They are all saying this looks bad.
I’ll wait to see how it turns out as it’s outside my area of expertise.
I will say that if it’s true then it’s going to be a major **** show. This wouldn’t flip the election to trump. It would invalidate it and we’d get to do it all over again.

I've got a couple of big issues with the software. One may seem a bit petty, but the vote count should be an integer value - no funky stuff with round offs - just the tally the numbers - straight up arithmetic. The other is that the software seems to be designed for dual purposes - vote counting and "clever" statistical support for reporting outlets - projections. The fiction and the non fiction should never exist in the same software. You tabulate the count in one and export the numbers to another for projections and "analysis". The count is what it is. The other function in the counting software has to be criteria for rejecting invalid ballots - like a vote for two or more candidates competing for the same office.

I've also got a major grievance with how things were handled. The hardware/software processing system should have been reviewed, proven, tested, and locked down prior to the election - no further software updates. There should never have been a question of updates during the election process. Counting votes may be tedious, but it is a simple thing. Verifying the accuracy of ballots may be tedious, but how hard is it to accept or reject ballots based on conformance with a stated set of standards. This is a no brainer - proof testing before allowing a system to become operation - whether a nuclear plant, an aircraft, a car, or election process. Yet, somebody always finds a way to hide stuff in complex software - like VW and emissions tests. Keep it simple - counting votes is simple; keep the analytical/statistical stuff separate. You should never see a vote tabulation decrease - we don't have negative voting.
 
I would again invite you both to go back and read my posts. If you had slowed down and read what I actually wrote, you wouldn't look so terribly ignorant.

ETA: Sorry to do this to you guys, but this is one of many posts that blows your pearl clutching outrage out of the water. Literally all I did was report the claims, check the claims, and report my findings with the caveat that there may be perfectly innocent explanations.



BB, you are posting like a jilted school girl. I respectfully recommend that you take the night off and get yourself together.
Crush, you seem like a smart dude. And, you obviously know how to write some code. Now, if your product is good, then send it to the federal election commission or the FBI and make your case with them. Continuing to post your “discoveries” here is useless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
Crush, you seem like a smart dude. And, you obviously know how to write some code. Now, if your product is good, then send it to the federal election commission or the FBI and make your case with them. Continuing to post your “discoveries” here is useless.
Have I continued to post my discoveries here? And why should I feel the need to send it to anyone? Trump tweeted that he has data analysts on it.

I find it hilarious, the level of anonymous sourcing passed on here as gospel by the liberals, but if a conservative passes on claims and does more personal due diligence than any of you combined on the claims, it's mocked.

It's almost as though y'all are scared silly of this subject and your chosen way to deal with it is to mock it. One example of whistling past the graveyard, I guess.

But to answer you... If there's anything to this (and I'm not convinced there is), they won't need me. If there isn't, it was a fun exercise.

Good evening.
 
Seriously? Most people that left Twitter, myself included were banned for our political views. I lost both my accounts, one was political and one was just for Tennessee football. I deleted the app and signed up on Parler.

You were not banned for your political views. If you were banned, it was for breaking rules.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohhbother
he's an idiot imo... me and mama went down (low speed) in May with way less bare skin and still had lots of rash. But who doesn't like a good "hey boys watch this sh!t" video on a boring Friday night?
Hope you're both recovered(ing) well. It's easy to get hurt when you go down.

High side or low side? IMO, high side tends to be much more dangerous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hjeagle1vol
Yeah I’m sure it was just because of your political views. Lol
Jack Dorsey is a suppressor of free speech, as is the Facebook douche Zuckerberg, you want to see election interference? Look no further than these two globalist lunatics. My account was small, only about 3000 followers and they shut me down, algorithms are how they silence different points of view.
 
Seriously? Most people that left Twitter, myself included were banned for our political views. I lost both my accounts, one was political and one was just for Tennessee football. I deleted the app and signed up on Parler.
Nobody is banned from Twitter, just for expressing political views and opinions... no matter how extreme they might be. You must have violated a term of their service which you aren't sharing. Twitter will actually tolerate a lot. It's not easy to get permanently banned.
 
Hope you're both recovered(ing) well. It's easy to get hurt when you go down.

High side or low side? IMO, high side tends to be much more dangerous.

Low thank God. I was real close to having it stopped but some gravel laid us down. We're all good. Picked her up, jumped back on and road 100 miles homes with a few broke ribs and road rash. Mama slammed her knee cap right good so we were sore awhile, but hell I've already added another horse to the stable and took All-State and Harley to the cleaners on some insurance money put to the upgrades on that one. All good here thanks!
 

VN Store



Back
Top