2020 Presidential Race

#88,176
#88,176
PointGuard said:
What the hell I’m in. You deserve an ass kicking. It’ll be worth $2grand for me.

Where in Tn? When? ( the week before Christmas works for me and my girlfriend. I’ll chance the snow)

For the last time give me an address for the game. Seems like you keep moving the goal posts I accept anyway and you’re AFRAID to give me the address. Squints
Click to expand...

Give the $2K to Saint Judes or something and GTHO with this bravado pick up game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CABVOL, OldVolMan and 37L1
#88,177
#88,177
PointGuard said:
What the hell I’m in. You deserve an ass kicking. It’ll be worth $2grand for me.

Where in Tn? When? ( the week before Christmas works for me and my girlfriend. I’ll chance the snow)

For the last time give me an address for the game. Seems like you keep moving the goal posts I accept anyway and you’re AFRAID to give me the address. Squints
Click to expand...
Not afraid. Get here sooner. It takes 27 hours to get to Maryville.

See you next Saturday, the 5th, that will give you plenty of time. Let us know when you are here. Then we can meet up.

I need to see what kind of idiot you are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turdherder11
#88,178
#88,178
OldVolMan said:
I agree with you, especially if it happened to any former Presidents, I am confident they would have folded by now. But, I think Trump would like to buck the system and be known as the guy that beat the system. Being able to say, "I told you so" means all the world to him.
Click to expand...

I agree with you about that. Trump is the wild card that scared the crap out of the entrenched official DC elite (R and D alike) ... and not so elite taking up space in NoVA. The last thing all those people (using the term loosely) wanted was an outsider in the halls of power. Particularly a rogue outsider with little sense of tact (DC style) and diplomacy. What really amazes is the fact that so many people disenfranchised by what passes as government (of, by, and for the people) in DC would turn on the one person in history who would overturn what has become an imperial court in DC.

What republicans need to do - and won't - is to find more candidates somewhat in the Trump mold - aggressive, ready to wreak havoc, but with the class of an old southern gentleman (who knows the meaning of "bless your soul" and the ability to rip out your heart and leave you feeling grateful for the experience) rather than a crass yankee who can't put enough words together to form a cohesive sentence.
 
#88,179
#88,179
NCFisher said:
Damn, bro, hate to ruin your gotcha' but I'd support Democrats as having ground to challenge that if they have a claim of damages. However, I suspect they've not done so since even with their machinations, Trump appears to have won. I want the legislature to assert their constitutional domain over elections and ensure officials cannot interfere again.

See how objectivity and rationale work?
Click to expand...
What are you talking about? Trump appears to have won what exactly? He lost the presidential election by a count of 306 to 232 in the electoral college. Nothing we have seen in court so far, indicates that there is going to be any change at all to this tally. To the contrary, the arguments of the Trump legal team have been openly ridiculed in court for their lack of evidence and merit. There is nothing objective or logical about your posts. You present fanciful opinions as established facts. Your posts are untethered to reality.
 
#88,180
#88,180
Rasputin_Vol said:
I will have to look at that quote in full context to help me see the same concerns that you see. I reag the Georgia filing and it seemed pretty straight forward. But I haven't read anything on the Pa case yet. I guess in my mind, I thought they may have multiple avenues to attack, and may actually have a bit more evidence than even in Ga of "criminal" activity.

Pennsylvania Judge Backs Trump Claims Over Mail-In Ballots, Says 'Unlikely Constitutional'
Click to expand...

I have no idea how PA and other states managed to legalize early voting, but the thought that it is established and her opinion includes the words "on election day" (as included in the PA constitution) while her opinion speaks of voting by mail contravening the constitution is disturbing. Could just be me, and my not having looked up how early voting was made legal in spite of the term "on election day".
 
#88,182
#88,182
AM64 said:
I have no idea how PA and other states managed to legalize early voting, but the thought that it is established and her opinion includes the words "on election day" (as included in the PA constitution) while her opinion speaks of voting by mail contravening the constitution is disturbing. Could just be me, and my not having looked up how early voting was made legal in spite of the term "on election day".
Click to expand...

I suspect this will go to the SCOTUS.

The big question is whether the PA Congress has the numbers to decertify the election and reallocate electors.

Another big question is what would happen if a state's governor sent one set of electors and their state legislators sent another. My understanding is that US Congress would see that as a contested election, and Congress would vote in the president.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#88,186
#88,186
Orange_Crush said:
I suspect this will go to the SCOTUS.

The big question is whether the PA Congress has the numbers to decertify the election and reallocate electors.

Another big question is what would happen if a state's governor sent one set of electors and their state legislators sent another. My understanding is that US Congress would see that as a contested election, and Congress would vote in the president.
Click to expand...

Somehow it seems like certification is a formality saying the count was correct - moving the count from "unofficial" to "official". If the count is proven to be incorrect because the election process was declared illegal, then it would seem that the certification would also have be deemed invalid because it was made on false premises. If improperly calibrated equipment is used during testing, then you have to deem the test invalid; numerical results are determined by an acceptable analytical process or they are pure speculation without merit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush
#88,189
#88,189
37L1 said:
Not afraid. Get here sooner. It takes 27 hours to get to Maryville.

See you next Saturday, the 5th, that will give you plenty of time. Let us know when you are here. Then we can meet up.

I need to see what kind of idiot you are.
Click to expand...

It’s not 27 hours in my bus to go 2034 miles. In reality I average 40 mph. I said the week before Christmas. I can’t be there for the 5th I have plans in place

Maryville is not good enough. Give me the specific name of where the court is so I know you have at least scoped this out. Otherwise you raise an interesting point. I’m the only one with skin in this game. $2,000 fuel up and back and 100 hours - just in driving time round trip. I’ve got to eat and sleep anyway so that cost/time doesn’t count

So you want to know if I’ll make that investment with only the name Maryville to go on after you have continually moved the goal posts you established. So far, your word means little because you keep moving the posts

You’re scared I get it. You’re looking for a graceful way out but I keep accepting even with all your goal post moving

I’ll gamble the $2k and 100 hours of driving time But you gotta give me more than Maryville. I need to track you down if you’re a no show and watch you crap your pants when you see what “kind of idiot” I am and just what you got your self into.

That way I’ll be sure you’ll show up on the court and I’ll give you a 20 point a$$ kicking.

How about this for a bet? Loser does 750 pushups before leaving the gym. I’m thinking I’ll get back to Yuma before you can go home
 
Last edited:
#88,190
#88,190
lostsheep said:
When a logical person realizes that every mainstream media source is reporting the election is over (even Fox News for F-sake), they reach the conclusion that it’s time to stop repeating trumps bs and move on.

Illogical people continue searching for stories that match their theory and end up with Newsmax, OAN, or the Gateway Pundit as sources.

Which category do you fit into?!
Click to expand...
I think you are allowing the media to call the election.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#88,191
#88,191
lostsheep said:
When a logical person realizes that every mainstream media source is reporting the election is over (even Fox News for F-sake), they reach the conclusion that it’s time to stop repeating trumps bs and move on.

Illogical people continue searching for stories that match their theory and end up with Newsmax, OAN, or the Gateway Pundit as sources.

Which category do you fit into?!
Click to expand...
I think you are allowing the media to call the election.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
#88,193
#88,193
37L1 said:
Not afraid. Get here sooner. It takes 27 hours to get to Maryville.

See you next Saturday, the 5th, that will give you plenty of time. Let us know when you are here. Then we can meet up.

I need to see what kind of idiot you are.
Click to expand...
 

Attachments

  • BB.gif
    BB.gif
    1 MB · Views: 8
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1
#88,199
#88,199
RockyTop85 said:
Yep. And if you rely on the government’s process for exercising a right and that process turns out to be “unconstitutional” then the remedy is that everyone loses the right.
Click to expand...

What would be your recourse for legislators if they rushed through a new and very flawed voting process without even what would have to have been a cursory look to see if they acted in accordance with the state constitution? What about the voters who opted for something too good to be true - but legal for the time being? Engineers hate the business adage that "there's never enough time to do it right, but there's always time to fix it". Seems like the courts - especially including John Roberts flunked the test by claiming there wasn't enough time to deliberate properly. If that were true, then mail it in voting should have been declared dead in it's tracks rather than allowed to go on - at least that seems to be the normal regulatory kind of thought when something can't be deemed safe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volinsd
#88,200
#88,200
Orange_Crush said:
I suspect this will go to the SCOTUS.

The big question is whether the PA Congress has the numbers to decertify the election and reallocate electors.

Another big question is what would happen if a state's governor sent one set of electors and their state legislators sent another. My understanding is that US Congress would see that as a contested election, and Congress would vote in the president.
Click to expand...

In your last paragraph are you saying if one state's slate of electors is invalidated, the entire election goes to Congress even if a candidate still reaches 270?

Edit: Maybe I should write "contested" instead of "invalidated."
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top