2020 Presidential Race

#91,077
#91,077
NorthDallas40 said:
Based on the wide authority given to Durham I’d guess he can actually get investigate this already. If you read the engagement letter Durham is given a lot of latitude and the Biden business deals were in the same timeframe.

Frankly I couldn’t care less what Hunter Biden did he isn’t worth a Special Counsel. But if his business dealings funneled money to the dementia patient then that absolutely needs to be evaluated. I’d hope Durham either conducted or was given the results of the Bobulinski interviews.
Click to expand...
I don’t think there’s any doubt he did. The dementia patient is compromised as he is owned by the Chinese among others
 
#91,081
#91,081
AM64 said:
As I said before it's a matter of transparency. There's a decent video of a clerk opening ballots and separating the unfolded ballot, putting the ballot in the stack, and the envelope in the box. No one near while she is doing this, and no way she's comparing a signature or the ballot against a voter roll. We've never seen the workflow - maybe there's a step before - maybe it's "we're counting everything that comes in". All I know is I don't trust bureaucracies and particularly government bureaucracies, and this process had too little oversight because the observers were kept back from the process "because of Covid". If you want trust, show the process openly; that didn't happen. As ND40 has stated there's no way to go back and verify mail in ballots in GA "because of ballot secrecy".

The courts didn't produce results; the courts said they weren't looking into the matter on the basis of technicalities.
Click to expand...
I do agree there's some fraud. From both sides. Your interpretation of what the courts have said isn't accurate. You're speculating as to the judges' thoughts. Why you continue to perpetuate a lost cause is bewildering. Trump is a self serving clown. Hopefully you haven't donated
 
#91,084
#91,084
USAFgolferVol said:
I do agree there's some fraud. From both sides. Your interpretation of what the courts have said isn't accurate. You're speculating as to the judges' thoughts. Why you continue to perpetuate a lost cause is bewildering. Trump is a self serving clown. Hopefully you haven't donated
Click to expand...

I've never donated to a political cause and never plan to. I went to great lengths to make sure when I conducted a test and the analysis it was done correctly - that's the way I work, and I expect others to do the same when they "represent" me in any way. I would never shy away from explaining or showing how or why we did any step of testing and analysis, and I'd willing spend as long as it took to explain a complex process to anyone. I simply don't understand why any honest person would do differently, but nobody seems very proud of the election work or willing to demonstrate competency - there's generally a reason when people are defensive about their work.
 
#91,085
#91,085
AM64 said:
I've never donated to a political cause and never plan to. I went to great lengths to make sure when I conducted a test and the analysis it was done correctly - that's the way I work, and I expect others to do the same when they "represent" me in any way. I would never shy away from explaining or showing how or why we did any step of testing and analysis, and I'd willing spend as long as it took to explain a complex process to anyone. I simply don't understand why any honest person would do differently, but nobody seems very proud of the election work or willing to demonstrate competency - there's generally a reason when people are defensive about their work.
Click to expand...
I understand the testing process and post-analysis at least as well as you. I'm not an ideologue and you are, so my evaluations are different from yours. Maybe you shouldn't be defensive about your analyses of political events. You will enjoy life much better and live longer
 
#91,087
#91,087
USAFgolferVol said:
I understand the testing process and post-analysis at least as well as you. I'm not an ideologue and you are, so my evaluations are different from yours. Maybe you shouldn't be defensive about your analyses of political events. You will enjoy life much better and live longer
Click to expand...
Ummmmm... glass houses and what not.
 
#91,091
#91,091
AM64 said:
So a little question. With regular balloting there are checks and balances - voter identification before the voter gets a ballot - the voter fills in the ballot because he/she can't bring an assistant and can't sell/donate the blank ballot - and the voter puts the completed ballot in the tabulator ... at least that's how it works with real paper ballots. There are people keeping an eye on the whole process up to the point at which they don't see your choices if you don't wave the completed ballot around.

The mail in ballot basically has none of those protections ... only the thinnest veneer of propriety - the signature. If no watcher was ever allowed to be close enough to examine signatures, and there is no real evidence that election officials matched signatures against voter rolls, do you consider the process valid? That a ballot recipient was actually the voter? That a completed ballot was actually cast by someone on the voter rolls? There's virtually no transparency in the vote by mail scheme, and that's why so many of us are calling BS. If the process was shoddy (and don't forget the absurdly low ballot rejection rate), then how do you correct the fiasco - other than pretend there was no fiasco?
Click to expand...
It's like trying to put the toothpaste back in the tube.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#91,092
#91,092
USAFgolferVol said:
I understand the testing process and post-analysis at least as well as you. I'm not an ideologue and you are, so my evaluations are different from yours. Maybe you shouldn't be defensive about your analyses of political events. You will enjoy life much better and live longer
Click to expand...

Really?
 
#91,094
#91,094
VolStrom said:
Yeah, they need a victory lap but uncle Joe broke his leg jerking his meat so he'll have to go another 6 months before he can talk to the media about ice cream. The democrats are so eff'n stoopid.
Click to expand...
Lol he talked to reporters this afternoon. That was where I got the info on more cabinet nominees this week.
 
#91,095
#91,095
USAFgolferVol said:
You should provide a specific example my newfound friend. I espouse an ideology from both sides of the spectrum. First and foremost, I'm a fiscal and military conservative. I'm a "mind your own business" social ideologue
Click to expand...
That’s why I eased my answer we’ve brohugged. Remember the crap I would throw your way on virtue signaling and what not. Is it possible you might have put forth a rather arbitrary purity test a few times? Thus when you offered up AM as an ideologue I think we can all wear that label a tad who post here 🤷‍♂️
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#91,099
#91,099
NorthDallas40 said:
That’s why I eased my answer we’ve brohugged. Remember the crap I would throw your way on virtue signaling and what not. Is it possible you might have put forth a rather arbitrary purity test a few times? Thus when you offered up AM as an ideologue I think we can all wear that label a tad who post here 🤷‍♂️
Click to expand...
Yes, certainly, in some form or fashion.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top