2020 Presidential Race

[LouderVol]

Here’s some judicial BS
Federal judge rejects election lawsuit brought by Loeffler, Perdue

Not enough evidence. You show nothing you get nothing.

Sorry you dont like how our justice works and want the government to be able to lock up everyone until they prove themselves innocent.

 

[AM64]

After government hack, media mum on ex-cybersecurity chief highlighted for contradicting Trump's fraud claims

The first question is why would anyone put a lawyer in charge of cybersecurity? Yeah, yeah, yeah, not forgetting the Microsoft gig - the people who patch security problems daily. This is one of our government's stupidest practices - lawyers running anything - especially anything technical. Read up on CISA and you quickly realize in the four year span of existence they've accomplished pretty much nothing but a "vision statement" of sorts and a website talking about all their responsibilities - all talk and no action. One of those responsibilities on the CISA website was something about developing a election process verification - which has disappeared from the website. I'd have to agree; it seems pretty dumb to accept the word of the people who let a major government hack happen when they say the election was fraud free.

 

[AM64]

Whatever happned in Hong Kong? This shitshow started when the protests started.

Grounded by covid as I recall. Hard to protest when you are locked down.

 

[Carl Pickens]

Not enough evidence. You show nothing you get nothing.

Sorry you dont like how our justice works and want the government to be able to lock up everyone until they prove themselves innocent.

Some wise ass didn’t even read the article.... cough cough....
The complaint, filed Thursday, aimed to force election officials in Georgia to segregate ballots cast by voters who registered after Nov. 3 over concerns that people were moving to the state simply to cast votes in the state's Jan. 5 Senate runoffs.
The federal lawsuit's main claim was that the Georgia Constitution bars people from voting in a runoff election who would not have been eligible to vote in the state during the general election. It asks that the court require Georgia election authorities to segregate ballots from voters who registered between Nov. 4 and Dec. 7 to check whether they voted in another state this year.

Does this seem unreasonable to you?

 

[volgr]

I disagree. He has thin skin like the outgoing traitor

How is Trump a traitor?

 

[volgr]

Some wise ass didn’t even read the article.... cough cough....
The complaint, filed Thursday, aimed to force election officials in Georgia to segregate ballots cast by voters who registered after Nov. 3 over concerns that people were moving to the state simply to cast votes in the state's Jan. 5 Senate runoffs.
The federal lawsuit's main claim was that the Georgia Constitution bars people from voting in a runoff election who would not have been eligible to vote in the state during the general election. It asks that the court require Georgia election authorities to segregate ballots from voters who registered between Nov. 4 and Dec. 7 to check whether they voted in another state this year.

Does this seem unreasonable to you?

This is what Trump is running into currently with our corrupt and politicised court system. They threw out his case before the election because he filed too early, now they are throwing them out because he filed too late.

Will be interesting to see if the same thing happens to the GA GOP post election.

 

[volgr]

Trump and the Trump cult was rejected, most notably by conservative leaning women, independents, and older white voters. Take the hint and move on from Trumpism.

Except Biden was trounced in almost every swing County across America. Trump won every swing County in Iowa which is a dead giveaway he didnt likely lose WI, MI, PA. People who know how elections work, know that is statistically impossible.

So, no, Trump wasnt rejected, quite the opposite.

 

[volgr]

The Donald is going to be up to his eyeballs in subpoenas a year from now.

This excites you?

 

[volgr]

Maybe a forensic audit is needed on Wisconsin 2016

They did one through Jill Stein, read up on it and tell me how it went.

 

[volgr]

A common tactic of Trumpets is to try and shift the burden of proof. Ask one of them if they can prove that voter fraud occurred, and you will frequently get this response: "Can you prove that it didn't?" It doesn't work that way! We don't have to prove Jack $hit.

Always comforting when the other side admits they have no evidence but will gaslight the hell out you. So pathetic.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Lol. I always find the “educated voter” chest pounding by dims both hilarious and ironic. There’s dims actually elected to office who believe an island may tip over if too many people are on one side and a “ghost gun” with a .30 caliber clip can dispense 30 rounds in .5 seconds. There’s countless “educated” dims who can’t tell you how many stars are on the flag or what they represent and think chocolate milk comes from brown cows. The last dim president said there was 57 states.

Yeah but they knew Dr King.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

I'm not a fan of Biden, but he has been a moderate for most of his career.

Hell, I don't know if I'm smart. I do know though, I'm smarter than you

It's not about Biden. It's about the CommieSlut that will take over when he is Article 25'd

 

[evillawyer]

Always comforting when the other side admits they have no evidence but will gaslight the hell out you. So pathetic.

You know @BowlBrother85 is 100% right. You don't walk into court, yell fraud, and win if the other guy doesn't present conclusive evidence of no fraud.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Someone needs to tell Donald, the best way to burn it all down is to tell his constits to vote Dem in GA.
Of course he could just kill us all with Gridlock if the Rubes prevail.

Gridlock would be a Godsend

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

This excites you?

It does excite most people that hate our country.

 

[clarksvol00]

Sounds about right.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Always comforting when the other side admits they have no evidence but will gaslight the hell out you. So pathetic.

The other side is telling you that they aren't the party who is obligated to prove something, such as an allegation of fraud. That responsibility belongs to the accuser.

 

[clarksvol00]

The other side is telling you that they aren't the party who is obligated to prove something, such as an allegation of fraud. That responsibility belongs to the accuser.

It's amazing how this has evolved. Stories about Ferraris and food trucks delivering phantom ballots. Raids by the US military attacking CIA assets on German soil. Dead foreign dictators altering results from beyond the grave. Earth-shattering claims about fraud are made in the media (or the landscaping parking lot), then affidavits that are nothing but hearsay and speculation are signed. Star witness Melissa Carone shows up at a meeting and rants like she started her Xanax and Chardonnay regimen too early in the day. Then a"forensic audit" by a Kraken crony shows 68% error rates in machines, but a hand recount shows the machines were off by 12 votes. None of that worked, so now some county in Pennsylvania didn't vote the way they wanted and that's substantial proof of fraud.

 

[Lerxtwood]

Lol. I always find the “educated voter” chest pounding by dims both hilarious and ironic. There’s dims actually elected to office who believe an island may tip over if too many people are on one side and a “ghost gun” with a .30 caliber clip can dispense 30 rounds in .5 seconds. There’s countless “educated” dims who can’t tell you how many stars are on the flag or what they represent and think chocolate milk comes from brown cows. The last dim president said there was 57 states.

Inject the disenfectent

 

[volgr]

You know @BowlBrother85 is 100% right. You don't walk into court, yell fraud, and win if the other guy doesn't present conclusive evidence of no fraud.

No one is yelling fraud and walking away. Again with the strawman argument. Again with the gaslighting. This is what you do when you have no evidence, which Bowling has already admitted to.

People are listing historical anomalies, backed up by small sample audits, affidavits and just this week the OSCE released a statement saying election monitoring did not meet our standard nor international standard for honest transparent elections.

But keep gaslighting.

 

[volgr]

It's amazing how this has evolved. Stories about Ferraris and food trucks delivering phantom ballots. Raids by the US military attacking CIA assets on German soil. Dead foreign dictators altering results from beyond the grave. Earth-shattering claims about fraud are made in the media (or the landscaping parking lot), then affidavits that are nothing but hearsay and speculation are signed. Star witness Melissa Carone shows up at a meeting and rants like she started her Xanax and Chardonnay regimen too early in the day. Then a"forensic audit" by a Kraken crony shows 68% error rates in machines, but a hand recount shows the machines were off by 12 votes. None of that worked, so now some county in Pennsylvania didn't vote the way they wanted and that's substantial proof of fraud.

You dealt with every odd ball claim without dealing with the most credible claims. Well done.

 

[volgr]

The other side is telling you that they aren't the party who is obligated to prove something, such as an allegation of fraud. That responsibility belongs to the accuser.

You've already admitted you have no evidence, so,why are you still in this discussion?

 

[BowlBrother85]

You've already admitted you have no evidence, so,why are you still in this discussion?

I haven't admitted anything. I'm siding with the party who doesn't need evidence of something. The people who bear the burden of proof, are the people who are alleging that fraud occurred. That is your side of the aisle.

 

[clarksvol00]

You dealt with every odd ball claim without dealing with the most credible claims. Well done.

Credible? "Counties in Iowa voted the way I wanted, but counties in Pennsylvania didn't," isn't credible proof of fraud.

 

[BowlBrother85]

This was predictable....

Per: The Hill.com

"Trump downplays impact of hack, questions whether Russia was involved"

by Tal Axelrod ... December 19, 2020 - 11:44 AM EST

President Trump on Saturday downplayed the impact of a sprawling hack on a litany of government agencies, defying officials' assessments of its extent while questioning their conclusion that Russia was behind the attack.

In two tweets Saturday morning, Trump used his first public remarks on the cyber intrusion to dismiss the severity of the hack while asserting that the media was playing it up to hurt him. The comments directly contradicted government officials and outside experts who said the attack, which hit the departments of Energy, Homeland Security, State and Treasury and more, was one of the broadest cyber attacks in recent memory.

"The Cyber Hack is far greater in the Fake News Media than in actuality. I have been fully briefed and everything is well under control. Russia, Russia, Russia is the priority chant when anything happens because Lamestream is, for mostly financial reasons, petrified of... discussing the possibility that it may be China (it may!), " Trump tweeted.

"There could also have been a hit on our ridiculous voting machines during the election, which is now obvious that I won big, making it an even more corrupted embarrassment for the USA," he added, echoing his claims that widespread voter fraud and irregularities kept him from winning a second term.

************************

To the bitter end, Trump will protect and defend his bestie, Vladimir Putin. For what it's worth, Donald Trump's own Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, strongly disagrees with every aspect of Trump's assessment of this recent cyber attack ....

"This was a very significant effort, and I think it's the case that now we can say pretty clearly that it was the Russians that engaged in this activity," Pompeo said in an interview Friday on "The Mark Levin Show"

Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, further added:

"Suffice it to say, there was a significant effort to use a piece of third-party software to essentially embed code inside of U.S. government systems and it now appears systems of private companies and companies and governments across the world as well." Pompeo said.

Microsoft president Brad Smith, said this: "The latest cyber-assault is effectively an attack on the United States and its government and other critical institutions, including security firms."

Once again, President Donald Trump cares much more about protecting his ego and defending Russia, then he ever will in protecting the United States from attack. This is the most serious cyber-attack against the United States of America in history. Does our President care? Sure, he cares... about Russia.