2020 Presidential Race

Who is not thin skinned in this enviro? You exempt?
Yes. It's not that hard if you realize,
that regardless of neither side f'ing up with policy legislation, it won' t alter a healthy and happy lifestyle. Perpetually thinking through a negative projection is unhealthy to both yourself and society
 
Yes. It's not that hard if you realize,
that regardless of neither side f'ing up with policy legislation, it won' t alter a healthy and happy lifestyle. Perpetually thinking through a negative projection is unhealthy to both yourself and society

I am all about policy and what I see where the progs want to steer, I am not naive to the stoopid ass policies that even both sides offer. This aint 2000.
And BTW, why was Trump so horrible with policy?
 
139376791_3994055200618835_1889364175120632259_n.jpg
 
I am all about policy and what I see where the progs want to steer, I am not naive to the stoopid ass policies that even both sides offer. This aint 2000.
And BTW, why was Trump so horrible with policy?
I've always stated some of his policies were great. Your assumption is a perfect example of my last post. I've never claimed his policies were horrible
I have always maintained many of them were great. Others, not so much
 
I've always stated some of his policies were great. Your assumption is a perfect example of my last post. I've never claimed his policies were horrible
I have always maintained many of them were great. Others, not so much

My assumtion is wild huh? Then why are u so thin skinned as Trump ruled as a 1990 Republican.
 
It's far too late for you to go that route. A nutritional and healthy meal, along with a glass or two of alcohol, should serve you well. Maybe even a puff of quality bud is even better

There you go again. You TOTALLY ignored my comment on Trump's policy and how it affected you and always only offer an ad hominem attack, LOL, or when you really get confused, bring out vulgar or nasty language.
You never offer a counter narrative without such, so that makes your comments WORTHLESS.

Really, your commentary is about the most useless drivel on the board. At least the LG's and Luther's offer substance, You....Nah. Have a good evening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
There you go again. You TOTALLY ignored my comment on Trump's policy and how it affected you and always only offer an ad hominem attack, LOL, or when you really get confused, bring out vulgar or nasty language.
You never offer a counter narrative without such, so that makes your comments WORTHLESS.

Really, your commentary is about the most useless drivel on the board. At least the LG's and Luther's offer substance, You....Nah. Have a good evening.
You never asked me how Trump's policies affected me, but I will answer. So little that I was never concerned, either way.
 
Remember how this incident got tens of thousands of retweets on how the Democrats were stealing the election (even though Republicans ran the office)? I wonder how many corrections were tweeted?

 
It was said when Trump was elected there was no foreign interference so why should we believe it now?

I doubt you find anybody that said there was "no" election interference, just as nobody has admitted "no" illegal voting.
Point being, there was a massive investigation for election altering then, so there should be now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LucidZ and AM64
Probably because they're tired of right wing conspiracy theorists using their platform to spread ********.

Was more than just Twitter. The people who wrote that report, a part of The American Report, website was also blocked. I tried to go to it last night and it was down, saying the user had been suspended.

Maybe you trust CNN more? Because they are also writing about SolarWinds, which was also detailed in the report.

Opinion: The SolarWinds hack is stunning. Here's what should be done - CNN
SolarWinds Orion hack: Why cybersecurity experts are worried - CNN

The same media outlet that was saying that people that thought the election was hacked were also conspiracy theorists, like you.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Meanwhile..............

Poll of the week: A new Quinnipiac University poll finds that President Donald Trump's approval rating stands at 33%, while his disapproval is at 60%.
An average of recent polls finds Trump with a 38% approval rating and 59% disapproval rating.
What's the point: A big question during the Trump presidency was whether anything could actually move the public opinion needle. It turns out that the insurrection at the US Capitol last week did exactly that.
The result is that Trump's final first term approval rating looks to be the lowest on record dating back since scientific polling began.
 
Meanwhile..............

Poll of the week: A new Quinnipiac University poll finds that President Donald Trump's approval rating stands at 33%, while his disapproval is at 60%.
An average of recent polls finds Trump with a 38% approval rating and 59% disapproval rating.
What's the point: A big question during the Trump presidency was whether anything could actually move the public opinion needle. It turns out that the insurrection at the US Capitol last week did exactly that.
The result is that Trump's final first term approval rating looks to be the lowest on record dating back since scientific polling began.

People still trust in polls as an accurate tool to measure something? Quinnipiac oversamples their polls using Democrats. Polling companies also made it seem like Clinton was going to win in 2016. The data polling companies gather is unreliable. From that same survey: Republican 26% - Democrat 32% - Independent 33% - Other/DK/NA 10 %. I guess just over a 1000 people mean they speak for the country of millions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64

VN Store



Back
Top