evillawyer
Kung Fu Kamala, B*tches!
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 31,876
- Likes
- 21,089
Nothing was saved. We went from stupid to ignorant. The result will be less freedom and I don't believe anyone in govt will ever voluntarily reverse that trend. Especially not someone whose only job for 5 decades had been in govtGood article, thanks.
They probably should have said "protected" the election which in turn "saved" the country.
Had Trump succeeded in overturning the election, the resulting loss of "freedom" would have dwarfed whatever perceived loss of freedom you think you might experience under Biden.Nothing was saved. We went from stupid to ignorant. The result will be less freedom and I don't believe anyone in govt will ever voluntarily reverse that trend. Especially not someone whose only job for 5 decades had been in govt
Had Trump succeeded in overturning the election, the resulting loss of "freedom" would have dwarfed whatever perceived loss of freedom you think you might experience under Biden.
State houses throwing out the vote and appointing their own electors. Or that angle where each state casts one vote. Trump was willing to take any avenue to wrongfully be declared the winner. He even pressured state election officials to refuse to certify their own elections.....you haven't already forgotten about GA have you?This makes zero sense. If Trump would have been successful in court that would mean we just experienced a coordinated well planned coup attempt.
State houses throwing out the vote and appointing their own electors. Or that angle where each state casts one vote. Trump was willing to take any avenue to wrongfully be declared the winner. He even pressured state election officials to refuse to certify their own elections.....you haven't already forgotten about GA have you?
Then we can agree the country was "saved" from the chaos that would have transpired during those months before the federal courts finally defeated Trump's efforts to steal the election.ALL would have been triggered, ordered or reviewed by the federal courts. SO he would have in any case had to win in the courts.
Interesting that you are fine with this level of interference from a shadow group who acted specifically against the will of the public.Good article, thanks.
They probably should have said "protected" the election which in turn "saved" the country.
That's not what I read in the article at all.Interesting that you are fine with this level of interference from a shadow group who acted specifically against the will of the public.
The end goal doesnt justify the means. It's how you get every atrocity known to man kind. Some idiot believes they are right to do wrong in order for the greater good. The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
The group took actions to quell reactions from the public. They directly interfered with the process (note the votes). Either you believe in the mob or you dont.That's not what I read in the article at all.
Did we read the same article?
It's a trade off. Always has been, always will be.You've admitted in this forum you value security over freedom. What a horrible way to live
What actions were taken to interfere with the process (the vote)?The group took actions to quell reactions from the public. They directly interfered with the process (note the votes). Either you believe in the mob or you dont.
This is another case of you wanting your cake (people voting) and eating it too (ignoring those same people as soon as the election is over).
Sorry that should have been "not the votes".What actions were taken to interfere with the process (the vote)?
Who ignored those people?