According to the recruiting expert who literally said Tennessee should concede the top in-state recruits to Vandy every year and look for talent elsewhere...
I mean this isn’t exactly total joint arthroplasty
I understand your comments and frustration but understand it happens almost everywhere (not a great excuse since I told my boys I don't care what everyone else is doing) but it is part of the process. Saw an article the other day and can't find it now that states that the number of P5 guys who stay after one year is nearing 50%. I think it was actually 47% don't make it a year. This is freshmen not transfers or juco guys. There were several reasons. Obviously over-recruiting, draft catching coaches off guard, players coming as walk-ons and preferred walk-ons to their dream schools which are a stretch, guys who can't make the grades, homesick, and guys who are just in over their heads. it was a good read and I will keep looking to find it. That number seems high to me but I know from this last year's freshman class that it is not. There are several others who are not coming back that have not made it public yet but the number will be close to 40% best I can tell. I do not have the answer to it because it is required to be competitive in the SEC. You have to go get more and allow more to come to get the ones you need to replace what is normally leaving every year. But I also say that if you want to play in the SEC you better be ready to beat out several guys before you get to represent your school. As I have told my son, you have to be at the top of the list before you get to wear the T and protect the T. You have to beat out your guys before you get to beat the other guys. My son and most others who are honest with themselves know this when they committed or walked-on at an SEC school.
It is like travel/showcase ball. I looked at the teams that won the WWBA's this year and all of them had 25-35 players on their rosters. The teams that showed up with 13 players have no chance of winning.
On number 2 you are saying a school should lose 50 percent if a kid transfers? What if the kid leaves on his own?Solid post.
Only thing I’d argue with is the degree it happens everywhere. There is a difference between over signing to protect the program from the draft and over signing without any kind of numbers in mind to stockpile and release kids.
He’s my solution.
1) there is no signing day. Once a kid commits the kid can sign with the school. If the school backs out of the commitment they lose that scholarship $ for one year. The kid can get out of the commitment if the head coach leaves or if he’s willing to sit out a year.
2) once a kid gets to school the school loses 50% of their scholarship money if the kid leaves after year one. One might say that’s harsh but the current apr rules are too soft. If a player leaves after 2 years no scholarship money is lost. This gives kids 2 years to get it right.
if those two things were implemented there would be no high numbers of offers given after watching a kids video on twitter which is happening right now. Coaches would take time to get to know kids and make sure it’s a good marriage before allowing them to sign. As it is now there is no risk at all taking commitments. I hear stories all the time of where coaches take commitments from kids and never even speak to anyone at the kids HS. They don’t do their homework because if it doesn’t work out there is no risk.
On number 2 you are saying a school should lose 50 percent if a kid transfers? What if the kid leaves on his own?
Bruin kids don’t just transfer because they are told too by a staff. Kids are in a play now mantality. They all are stars in high school and on the summer circuit. They are short on patience and want to play immediately, some get homesick, some don’t like their teammates. If a kid leave on their own a school shouldn’t be penalized for that. I could see your point if the school gave them the nudge out the door. Which I’m assuming you want cleaned up.I understand that’s an issue but apr was created to monitor the transfer rate of programs and its failed to have any effect. It should be seen as a failure in recruiting if a kid Transfers after one year and such mistakes should hurt a program as well as the kid imo
of course if there is a real mitigating circumstance for transfer such as a family members health than a waiver could be awarded allowing kids to play immediately and the school to not lose their 50%.
Jmo but mistakes made in recruiting should have consequences for programs. There are no consequences at all in this day and age
Bruin kids don’t just transfer because they are told too by a staff. Kids are in a play now mantality. They all are stars in high school and on the summer circuit. They are short on patience and want to play immediately, some get homesick, some don’t like their teammates. If a kid leave on their own a school shouldn’t be penalized for that. I could see your point if the school gave them the nudge out the door. Which I’m assuming you want cleaned up.
There’s a chance a scholarship might not be renewed, IIRC.Bruin kids don’t just transfer because they are told too by a staff. Kids are in a play now mantality. They all are stars in high school and on the summer circuit. They are short on patience and want to play immediately, some get homesick, some don’t like their teammates. If a kid leave on their own a school shouldn’t be penalized for that. I could see your point if the school gave them the nudge out the door. Which I’m assuming you want cleaned up.
Chase Burns changed schools. He’s now enrolled at Beech High School and will be playing for Jake Rucker’s former coach, Josh Carmen.
If Beech High School sounds familiar, it’s also where Jalen Hurd attended.
Covid allows them to transfer and play immediately with only sitting out a few games if they haven’t moved
I heard that same hs lost the vandy commit as well. If so that sucks for them