MAD
Arsenal FC, Detroit Lions
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2006
- Messages
- 50,824
- Likes
- 125,108
Let's look at this scenario. The winning run is on third base, nice lead.
Catcher misses/ drops the ball. Runner is coming, he can't locate the ball.
This umpire says it's right here, right here. Catcher picks it up, tags out the runner game over?
Yep, he is too involved.Never. Never heard this much on the pitches either. I’m ok with it but playing through HS may have heard a couple pitches a game where the ump said outside or low but not to this extent.
How can we be sure though? He’s used to commenting on almost every pitch (beyond simply calling balls and strikes) that perhaps he slips up and blurts out where a ball is that directly impacts a play.I get where you’re coming from, but the catcher wasn’t part of the play in this case. Like I said, if it was the catcher’s ball it wouldn’t have happened.
Great, Vandy gets the sympathetic, helpful ump, we’ll get the A-hole, with the erratic strike zone tomorrow.Yep, he is too involved.
Officiating as part of sports, but you don't need to be seen or heard until necessary.
Is the first base ump telling the first baseman where the ball is, or position he needs to be in. No.
As a catcher for 18 years I never had an umpire "help" any situation. Balls and strikes only. maybe an argument now and then but no help in any way. I think it is not his job and is not appropraite.I caught and that’s why I spoke up. Its definitely not common, but I’m not surprised from my own experiences. Umpires that are more of the controlling type are the ones that chat and are edgy. This guy seems thorough af.
When you think about it they ban those vuvuzelas, and the whistling is a 100 times worse. I would be pissed if I had to endure it.Vandy Whistler is trending on Twitter and not in a good way View attachment 375192