vol94
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2010
- Messages
- 10,490
- Likes
- 15,206
What the hell are you talking about? I quoted the posts to which I was responding. You singled my post out for your response, and I was the ONE person in this thread that said all along I wanted proof that these videos were real. Now, if you ASSUMED that I responded to a different post than I did, then that’s YOUR mistake, not mine. Either way, you owe me an apology. I will accept it if it is offered.You responded to WTO’s clip - which is 12 secs long and doesn’t include the “wife” portion.
“I’m sorry” you quoted the wrong post?
Apologies are against our code of conduct.What the hell are you talking about? I quoted the posts to which I was responding. You singled me out for your response, and I was the ONE person in this thread that said I wanted proof that these videos were real. Now if you ASSUMED that I respondedvto a different than I did, the that’s YOUR mistake, not mine. Either way, you owe me an apology. I will accept it if it is offered.
Are you struggling to keep up with your own posts? Surely it’s not my responsibility to ensure you have any idea what you’re responding to?What the hell are you talking about? I quoted the posts to which I was responding. You singled my post out for your response, and I was the ONE person in this thread that said all along I wanted proof that these videos were real. Now, if you ASSUMED that I responded to a different post than I did, then that’s YOUR mistake, not mine. Either way, you owe me an apology. I will accept it if it is offered.
You can’t be this dense. Are you auditioning to replace turbovol right now? That IS the post to which I was responding. Right after I made that post, someone responded with this post:Are you struggling to keep up with your own posts? Surely it’s not my responsibility to ensure you have any idea what you’re responding to?
This is the WTO clip. 12 seconds. Only the wigger portion -
This is you quoting that clip -
View attachment 657556
Which is the exact quote I responded to.
If true? It's there on video.
My guess is that it’s legit. However, I’ll wait to at least see it on an actual news channel rather than a tweet before I assume it’s not doctored.
WTF are assuming that I meant to respond to the “wife” clip. This is the root of the problem. You ASSUMED that I was posting about the “wife” clip, and you ASSUMED WRONG. Then you later had the arrogance to say, “I’m sorry you quoted the wrong post.” If anybody is drunk, it’s clearly you.That’s WTO.
He’s the one that posted the wigger clip.
The clip you responded to.
He never posted the “wife” clip.
Are you drunk?
Lol if you actually meant to respond to the “wigger” clip than we’re simply back to square one -WTF are assuming that I meant to respond to the “wife” clip. This is the root of the problem. You ASSUMED, and you ASSUMED WRONG. If anybody is drunk, it’s clearly you.
Yea, but it’s not true. It’s painfully obvious he’s just mumbling, attempting to say “rigor”.
It’s a nonsensical take.
I’m not wasting anymore time on you. I was apparently wrong. You are that dense.Lol if you actually meant to respond to the “wigger” clip than we’re simply back to square one -
It was a terrible take to even imply “if true”. It’s clearly not true. Just an old man mumbling.
It’s actually worse than you quoting the wrong post lol.
They always do that.. I have always wondered who the person is that tells them ‘hey, everyone say this..’… We don’t seem to do this on the Right, we all have different opinions on just about every situation., I think the Left has a designated propaganda person… if they tried this with us on the Right, everyone would tell them to eff off though more politely maybe … we just aren’t as monolithic as the Left.. which is a strength, in my opinion.. the Left has a better run ‘machine’.. but we may be a tad more authentic.. warts and all.. there’s not a great filtering sieve of any sort it seems Which is also why the Left finds themselves in their current situation.. they were also saying the same thing re Joe, and it clearly wasn’t true.. oopsieEvery Dem talking head and politician they bring on CNN tonight is harping on Project 2025.
It’s clearly a talking point that’s been put out - they are all on message.
"Horse paste" is a great example.They always do that.. I have always wondered who the person is that tells them ‘hey, everyone say this..’… We don’t seem to do this on the Right, we all have different opinions on just about every situation., I think the Left has a designated propaganda person… if they tried this with us on the Right, everyone would tell them to eff off though more politely maybe … we just aren’t as monolithic as the Left.. which is a strength, in my opinion.. the Left has a better run ‘machine’.. but we may be a tad more authentic.. warts and all.. there’s not a great filtering sieve of any sort it seems
There was a "scandal" in the late 2000s, called JournoList. Liberal news people had a closed forum to discuss and share with each other.They always do that.. I have always wondered who the person is that tells them ‘hey, everyone say this..’… We don’t seem to do this on the Right, we all have different opinions on just about every situation., I think the Left has a designated propaganda person… if they tried this with us on the Right, everyone would tell them to eff off though more politely maybe … we just aren’t as monolithic as the Left.. which is a strength, in my opinion.. the Left has a better run ‘machine’.. but we may be a tad more authentic.. warts and all.. there’s not a great filtering sieve of any sort it seems Which is also why the Left finds themselves in their current situation.. they were also saying the same thing re Joe, and it clearly wasn’t true.. oopsie
IKR it is even verbatimThere was a "scandal" in the late 2000s, called JournoList. Liberal news people had a closed forum to discuss and share with each other.
The site is closed but I have no doubt the participants simply moved to another platform. The echo chamber topica are simply too consistently unified to be random chance.