2024 Presidential Race

[WoodsmanVol]

Speaking of lost, the fact that you think the only issue with Biden is that he is a doddering zombie speaks volumes about your policy positions. Apparently you liked Lyndon Johnson because Biden always compare himself to him.

Despite your illusions of grandeur, you're not telepathic, so don't know a thing about what I think. I seriously doubt you even know what you think. As for who I liked, I still can't figure out who I vote(d) for, whom I like or dislike, is of such an immense concern for you. While I, on the other hand don't give a dayum about who you vote(d) for, like or dislike. Of course, you could be obsessed with me for some odd reason. Look, I'm married, I'm straight, so whatever it is that makes you lust for me, forget it, I'm not interested. Now, my policy positions? I no longer work for the government, I used to be a state employee, but that's long past. So I don't have any policies. But if I did, it would be to ship every illegal immigrant, and every MAGA off to Gehenna II, on an Alderson Drive powered cargo spaceship.

 

[JOEY’S ALL VOL !!!]

Joe gets a participation trophy because he did a press conference? because he answered questions? It’s quite comical that anyone could possibly believe he’s fit to be POTUS and it’s downright absurd and sad that anyone would cast a vote for him. The man wasn’t worthy or fit in 2020 and here he is bumbling and mumbling his way towards 2024. The American voting populace is woefully inept at giving this country a chance to try and straighten itself out.

 

[WoodsmanVol]

MAGAs will divert, deny, dismiss, or lie about it, but Ronald Reagan (of whom I'm a fan and voted for to satisfy the curiosity of some), had a touch of Bidenitis. Now, let's see what the morbid MAGAs say about this. Oh, for the record, I want ole Joe to get out of the way and make room for a more capable candidate. For the record again, I'm not in favor of a Harris Administration, the idea scares me. Now, back to the MAGA-Reagan response.

 

[TN Ribs]

Despite your illusions of grandeur, you're not telepathic, so don't know a thing about what I think. I seriously doubt you even know what you think. As for who I liked, I still can't figure out who I vote(d) for, whom I like or dislike, is of such an immense concern for you. While I, on the other hand don't give a dayum about who you vote(d) for, like or dislike. Of course, you could be obsessed with me for some odd reason. Look, I'm married, I'm straight, so whatever it is that makes you lust for me, forget it, I'm not interested. Now, my policy positions? I no longer work for the government, I used to be a state employee, but that's long past. So I don't have any policies. But if I did, it would be to ship every illegal immigrant, and every MAGA off to Gehenna II, on an Alderson Drive powered cargo spaceship.

Don't tell Tucker Carlson that Breathe is cheating on him.

 

[85SugarVol]

MAGAs will divert, deny, dismiss, or lie about it, but Ronald Reagan (of whom I'm a fan and voted for to satisfy the curiosity of some), had a touch of Bidenitis. Now, let's see what the morbid MAGAs say about this. Oh, for the record, I want ole Joe to get out of the way and make room for a more capable candidate. For the record again, I'm not in favor of a Harris Administration, the idea scares me. Now, back to the MAGA-Reagan response.

The Reagan was senile too narrative has been floating for weeks now.

It’s not a very good one, but there’s not much to work with at this point.

 

[85SugarVol]

Yes, all presidents are prepped on various topics. That’s not what I’m saying.

I’m saying this will be the prep:

- Mr President this is a picture of Jill
- Call on her first
- This is what her question is
- This is your answer

- Call on Bob next, this is his question…

@lawgator1

So yea, they gave him the list of who to call on. At least they didn’t hide, but then again I’m not sure they could have

 

[LSU-SIU]

@lawgator1

So yea, they gave him the list of who to call on. At least they didn’t hide, but then again I’m not sure they could have

Now, that isn't unusual for a press conference. I mean, even if he had the questions in advance, he really can't hold that question in his head long enough to get the standard response out anyway. He just rambles and slowly fades like he is at assisted living.

I think he had the questions either prior to the debate or right before they asked them, but I don't think it really matters. He's been jello for years.

Joe probably couldn't have lived on his own years ago.

 

[lawgator1]

I didn’t hear many facts from him last night.

I disagree, he seemed to be very much aware of who was playing what role in various matters. I don't think its going out on a limb to say that he has far more experience in foreign affairs than does Trump. Trump is naive about a lot of things and speaks in broad terms whereas Biden is much more aware of history of such matters and the minutiae. Gaza/Palestine and Israel and the war cabinet are probably the sharpest example from last night.

But that has never really seemed to be what Presidential politics are about and I doubt that's any different this go 'round. As much as Biden may know, if he can't be effective in communicating about that now in the campaign, or can't be effective in his dealings with foreign leaders again because his ability to communicate (which has never been his strong suit anyway) is deteriorating, that does not auger well.

And of course given the current dynamic every miscue by Biden, every misstatement, every gaffe, is magnified and its hard to know where the line is between just mixing up names (Trump has done it, as we know) versus actual deterioration of mental acuity is evidenced.

Personally, I don't think its always one or the other with Biden. Sometimes its just mixing up names, which happens. But sometimes its a sign of lack of focus and cognitive skills, which gets worse over time, not better.

Its not like there is a specific line in time where one crosses over from "totally fine" to "utterly incompetent." It waxes and wanes, rises and falls, but always in a long-term downward path. And so, despite there being a distinct point in time where you can say "a ha, that's it," I do think Biden is at or has crossed the line and so should get out while the getting's good.

 

[LSU-SIU]

I disagree, he seemed to be very much aware of who was playing what role in various matters. I don't think its going out on a limb to say that he has far more experience in foreign affairs than does Trump. Trump is naive about a lot of things and speaks in broad terms whereas Biden is much more aware of history of such matters and the minutiae. Gaza/Palestine and Israel and the war cabinet are probably the sharpest example from last night.

But that has never really seemed to be what Presidential politics are about and I doubt that's any different this go 'round. As much as Biden may know, if he can't be effective in communicating about that now in the campaign, or can't be effective in his dealings with foreign leaders again because his ability to communicate (which has never been his strong suit anyway) is deteriorating, that does not auger well.

And of course given the current dynamic every miscue by Biden, every misstatement, every gaffe, is magnified and its hard to know where the line is between just mixing up names (Trump has done it, as we know) versus actual deterioration of mental acuity is evidenced.

Personally, I don't think its always one or the other with Biden. Sometimes its just mixing up names, which happens. But sometimes its a sign of lack of focus and cognitive skills, which gets worse over time, not better.

Its not like there is a specific line in time where one crosses over from "totally fine" to "utterly incompetent." It waxes and wanes, rises and falls, but always in a long-term downward path. And so, despite there being a distinct point in time where you can say "a ha, that's it," I do think Biden is at or has crossed the line and so should get out while the getting's good.

You said he needed to be replaced. Who is going to read the whole wall of text from a psycho?



"Hey guys, I'm going to tell you the truth this time.... I was just kidding about all that anyway."

 

[BreatheUT]

I've long said Jacked Up Joe would not qualify to be a shift lead for the cooks at McDonald's. Things would go from stable to trainwreck and they would go out of business under his direction.

 

[WoodsmanVol]

The Reagan was senile too narrative has been floating for weeks now.

It’s not a very good one, but there’s not much to work with at this point.

There it is. Divert, dismiss, deny, and lie. Typical MAGA tactic.
You have to 4expect that from the Liarindent lovers. AKA:
Trumpanzees.

 

[KptVFL]

Oh. This one is vicious.
It was especially damning when VP Trump told Zelenski he'd have more flexibility after the election.

lol! Very well played!

 

[hog88]

I disagree, he seemed to be very much aware of who was playing what role in various matters. I don't think its going out on a limb to say that he has far more experience in foreign affairs than does Trump. Trump is naive about a lot of things and speaks in broad terms whereas Biden is much more aware of history of such matters and the minutiae. Gaza/Palestine and Israel and the war cabinet are probably the sharpest example from last night.

But that has never really seemed to be what Presidential politics are about and I doubt that's any different this go 'round. As much as Biden may know, if he can't be effective in communicating about that now in the campaign, or can't be effective in his dealings with foreign leaders again because his ability to communicate (which has never been his strong suit anyway) is deteriorating, that does not auger well.

And of course given the current dynamic every miscue by Biden, every misstatement, every gaffe, is magnified and its hard to know where the line is between just mixing up names (Trump has done it, as we know) versus actual deterioration of mental acuity is evidenced.

Personally, I don't think its always one or the other with Biden. Sometimes its just mixing up names, which happens. But sometimes its a sign of lack of focus and cognitive skills, which gets worse over time, not better.

Its not like there is a specific line in time where one crosses over from "totally fine" to "utterly incompetent." It waxes and wanes, rises and falls, but always in a long-term downward path. And so, despite there being a distinct point in time where you can say "a ha, that's it," I do think Biden is at or has crossed the line and so should get out while the getting's good.

His comments about the economy, inflation and jobs were blatant lies. Well, ok I'll grant that he's to senile to know that they were lies since he was just parroting the information his staffers gave him.

 

[Jxn Vol]

I disagree, he seemed to be very much aware of who was playing what role in various matters. I don't think its going out on a limb to say that he has far more experience in foreign affairs than does Trump. Trump is naive about a lot of things and speaks in broad terms whereas Biden is much more aware of history of such matters and the minutiae. Gaza/Palestine and Israel and the war cabinet are probably the sharpest example from last night.

But that has never really seemed to be what Presidential politics are about and I doubt that's any different this go 'round. As much as Biden may know, if he can't be effective in communicating about that now in the campaign, or can't be effective in his dealings with foreign leaders again because his ability to communicate (which has never been his strong suit anyway) is deteriorating, that does not auger well.

And of course given the current dynamic every miscue by Biden, every misstatement, every gaffe, is magnified and its hard to know where the line is between just mixing up names (Trump has done it, as we know) versus actual deterioration of mental acuity is evidenced.

Personally, I don't think its always one or the other with Biden. Sometimes its just mixing up names, which happens. But sometimes its a sign of lack of focus and cognitive skills, which gets worse over time, not better.

Its not like there is a specific line in time where one crosses over from "totally fine" to "utterly incompetent." It waxes and wanes, rises and falls, but always in a long-term downward path. And so, despite there being a distinct point in time where you can say "a ha, that's it," I do think Biden is at or has crossed the line and so should get out while the getting's good.

You would shower with him wouldn’t you?

 

[TheDirector]

I disagree, he seemed to be very much aware of who was playing what role in various matters. I don't think its going out on a limb to say that he has far more experience in foreign affairs than does Trump. Trump is naive about a lot of things and speaks in broad terms whereas Biden is much more aware of history of such matters and the minutiae. Gaza/Palestine and Israel and the war cabinet are probably the sharpest example from last night.

Trump - Putin does not attack Ukraine
Biden - Putin Attacks Ukraine
Trump - Abraham Peace Accords in the Middle East
Biden - Gaza War, Afghanistan Withdrawal, Closer to WW3 than under Trump
You are what your record says you are..............................

 

[turbovol]

Trump - Putin does not attack Ukraine
Biden - Putin Attacks Ukraine
Trump - Abraham Peace Accords in the Middle East
Biden - Gaza War, Afghanistan Withdrawal, Closer to WW3 than under Trump
You are what your record says you are..............................

The usual MAGA nonsense. Nobody knows---least of all the sodbusters--why Putin attacked Ukraine when he did.
The bigger point is that thanks to Biden and NATO and other U.S. allies, Russia--our chief adversary--as been significantly weakened in
many ways. Beyond that, Putin's has worked since he gained power to weaken/fracture NATO. Now, the opposite has happened:
NATO has been strengthened AND expanded two important new members in Finland and Sweden. That's a massive win for Biden
and Europe--though I don't expect the Earls to understand it.

Trump's interests are contrary to the interests of his own country. I want to Earls to suck on that fact for a while. He's a massive national-security threat who belongs in prison, not the White House. He likes our chief adversary/enemy and dislikes America's longtime and vital European allies. Suck on that fact, Patriots. He's a traitor.

 

[creekdipper]

Maybe Biden could be foreign policy advisor to Trump. That would assuage Dem's fears.

 

[turbovol]

You would shower with him wouldn’t you?

Trump would like to shower with his Daddy--Vlad the Impaler. That much we know. The word is that Trump puts on women's silk underwear whenever he's supposed to have contact with the War Criminal. His fleshy, overweight undercarriage apparently gets rather moist.

 

[turbovol]

Who are we saying is senile?

 

[turbovol]

There are many things that scream lowlife about the gangster--MANY things--and certainly his transparent nonsense and laughable lies about Jan6 are close to the top. But it's a big list, and very top-heavy.

 

[TheDirector]

The usual MAGA nonsense. Nobody knows---least of all the sodbusters--why Putin attacked Ukraine when he did.
The bigger point is that thanks to Biden and NATO and other U.S. allies, Russia--our chief adversary--as been significantly weakened in
many ways. Beyond that, Putin's has worked since he gained power to weaken/fracture NATO. Now, the opposite has happened:
NATO has been strengthened AND expanded two important new members in Finland and Sweden. That's a massive win for Biden
and Europe--though I don't expect the Earls to understand it.

Trump's interests are contrary to the interests of his own country. I want to Earls to suck on that fact for a while. He's a massive national-security threat who belongs in prison, not the White House. He likes our chief adversary/enemy and dislikes America's longtime and vital European allies. Suck on that fact, Patriots. He's a traitor.

We do know why Putin attacked Ukraine when he did. He saw the disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal and mental decline of Biden and knew American leadership was weak. Just like he saw the fake red line not to cross under Obama when he attacked Ukraine. He feared Trump so he didn't dare do the same. Like I said, you are what your record says you are. Keep spinning though. I've seen zero polls that say Biden handles foreign policy better than Trump. The voters know!

 

[NorthDallas40]

MAGAs will divert, deny, dismiss, or lie about it, but Ronald Reagan (of whom I'm a fan and voted for to satisfy the curiosity of some), had a touch of Bidenitis. Now, let's see what the morbid MAGAs say about this. Oh, for the record, I want ole Joe to get out of the way and make room for a more capable candidate. For the record again, I'm not in favor of a Harris Administration, the idea scares me. Now, back to the MAGA-Reagan response.

This disproved stupidity again. Reagan himself announced his diagnosis… around 3 or 4 years after he left office. While in office he was shot and treated for colorectal cancer and still did is job from his hospital bed. Comparing puddinhead to Reagan is moronic.

 

[LSU-SIU]

Who are we saying is senile?

The democrats tell me Biden is senile, are they wrong?

 

[lostsheep]

We do know why Putin attacked Ukraine when he did. He saw the disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal and mental decline of Biden and knew American leadership was weak. Just like he saw the fake red line not to cross under Obama when he attacked Ukraine. He feared Trump so he didn't dare do the same. Like I said, you are what your record says you are. Keep spinning though. I've seen zero polls that say Biden handles foreign policy better than Trump. The voters know!

So you would argue that Hoover was a "stronger" president than FDR because Hitler invaded Poland during his administration and not Hoover's? Sounds logical....

 

[StarRaider]

They are saying puddinhead drops out next week... right in the middle of the GOP convention. Coincidental timing no doubt.