DEFENDTHISHOUSE
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2006
- Messages
- 28,633
- Likes
- 32,092
It should be clear that I meant that from a political standpoint, he has had a good month. He did very well in a debate. He gave a good speech last night (his speech at the RNC was too long and boring, but hasn't hurt him). He looked strong and defiant in the face of assassination attempt.The irony in this… the man was nearly killed.
I said before and I'll say it again, Kamala has about as much chance of beating Trump as Biden did, which is to say none. The Dems screwed themselves by creating this situation where there almost HAVE to give it to Kamala in this scenario.
I think their best odds would be to hold an "open convention" and rig it for someone like Mark Kelly to win. Astronaut vs Trump sounds like a marketable strategy. However I am guessing that it is essentially already set in stone that it will be Harris.
Exactly.I am gonna follow Obama and Pelosi and if they havent endorsed Harris, then it will be truly open..imo.
Exactly.
If Harris was already set in stone, Obama and Pelosi would have already endorsed her, and Pelosi wouldn't be calling for an open convention.
At the end of the day, I think Harris is the safe pick, but I don't think it's set in stone yet.
Liberals/progressives have been preaching old white men are the problem. Can’t replace the DEI #2 with another old white man.I said before and I'll say it again, Kamala has about as much chance of beating Trump as Biden did, which is to say none. The Dems screwed themselves by creating this situation where there almost HAVE to give it to Kamala in this scenario.
I think their best odds would be to hold an "open convention" and rig it for someone like Mark Kelly to win. Astronaut vs Trump sounds like a marketable strategy. However I am guessing that it is essentially already set in stone that it will be Harris.