2024 Presidential Race

America's Next First Daughter? Ella Emhoff loves her Unibrow and Armpit Hair... modelled topless and is Pro-Trans... and this is why she called stepmom Kamala's marriage 'vomit-inducing'​


View attachment 661703

And in many ways, 25-year-old Ella Emhoff, the heavily tattooed and unapologetically uni-browed daughter of Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff, epitomizes the Gen-Z liberal: She runs a knitting club, advocates for transgender rights and doesn't shave her armpits.

View attachment 661704

Just another couple of liberal odd ducks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
It's what being discussed in the WH press conference currently. The question was why would she hold a separate discussion from Biden? To be honest, I'm not sure why Netanyahu would talk to her at all. She is just a candidate. She's never been POTUS. Should he also speak with RFK, Jr?
Politics is a dirty game, played by dirty people, for dirty reasons. Add water (money), you get mud, route it into a cesspool AKA: lobbyists stakeholders and influence peddlers, you get slurry, AKA: liquid shyte.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
Me too, there still needs to be more pride in this country as a whole though. The division is manufactured in my opinion and it’s only hurting good people.

Ehh, pride in the country, to many equate country with government and that's a big F NO for me.

100% agree that the division is manufactured because a divided people are easier to subjugate than a unified people.
 
I have yet to watch a single Trump rally, how often are you watching them?


I don't seek them out. I really don't think that many people do, including the day-to-day MAGA crowd. But Trump is the master of stepping up right to the line of saying a blatantly racist thing, a blatantly sexist thing, but at the last millimeter taking a step back, knowing that what he said will get him on the news. And both antagonize those against him and excite those for him.
 
I don't seek them out. I really don't think that many people do, including the day-to-day MAGA crowd. But Trump is the master of stepping up right to the line of saying a blatantly racist thing, a blatantly sexist thing, but at the last millimeter taking a step back, knowing that what he said will get him on the news. And both antagonize those against him and excite those for him.

That's the difference between Trump and Biden, Trump walks the line and Biden just steps right over it.
 
It's what being discussed in the WH press conference currently. The question was why would she hold a separate discussion from Biden? To be honest, I'm not sure why Netanyahu would talk to her at all. She is just a candidate. She's never been POTUS. Should he also speak with RFK, Jr?


He's speaking to Trump, too.

Personally, I don't think he should meet with anyone other than the sitting POTUS, but as I've said elsewhere there is a lot of manipulation going on, her and at home, and there is value to Net in seeking commitments for $ and arms so he can go home and say he secured it, and to politicians here saying they are aligned with Net.

Neither of which advances us one step closer to a solution to the problem.
 
I don't seek them out. I really don't think that many people do, including the day-to-day MAGA crowd. But Trump is the master of stepping up right to the line of saying a blatantly racist thing, a blatantly sexist thing, but at the last millimeter taking a step back, knowing that what he said will get him on the news. And both antagonize those against him and excite those for him.
What racist thing has Trump said?
 
He's speaking to Trump, too.

Personally, I don't think he should meet with anyone other than the sitting POTUS, but as I've said elsewhere there is a lot of manipulation going on, her and at home, and there is value to Net in seeking commitments for $ and arms so he can go home and say he secured it, and to politicians here saying they are aligned with Net.

Neither of which advances us one step closer to a solution to the problem.

While I asked myself the same question about meeting with Trump, Trump is a former POTUS and the potential future POTUS. They have become friends.
 
He's speaking to Trump, too.

Personally, I don't think he should meet with anyone other than the sitting POTUS, but as I've said elsewhere there is a lot of manipulation going on, her and at home, and there is value to Net in seeking commitments for $ and arms so he can go home and say he secured it, and to politicians here saying they are aligned with Net.

Neither of which advances us one step closer to a solution to the problem.
He can meet with whomever he wants. Probably meeting with the one that openly and truthfully supports him, and doesn't want to waste his time here with a demented "president" or a cackling fool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol
I would change your analogy to this....the two choices are liver and chicken nuggets. I'm no fan of chicken nuggets and would never order them for a meal.......unless the only other choice was worse.

I hate liver and the thought of having that daily for lunch for the rest of the school year is repulsive.
I'm going to vote against liver by placing my vote for the only other viable choice....even though it's a choice I do no like.

I've said that if the two choices are relatively equal - vote 3rd party or don't vote.
But if the two choices are not relatively equal - it makes no sense to not vote your preference.
except in this case, even you have admitted that the chicken nuggets have spoiled, gone bad, and aren't fit for human consumption. but you are there voting for it, and calling others evil for not supporting your choice.

any sane human is still not going to choose the chicken nuggets in that option. if all things were equal they might be the "hold your nose and chose", but things definitely weren't equal.
 
MAGA crowds seem bored by policy discussion, especially detailed policy discussion.

Face it, they come for the show, not the substance.
pot to kettle much?

i can think of only a handful of times you have EVER engaged in any real discussion. yet alone one on policy. you hand grenade in your unlinked wild opinion, and then never respond in any consequential manner that furthers the discussion.

its a rally, no rally gets into detailed policy discussions. seriously find one non-maga rally that got into some type of discussion about policy.
 
got any specifics? seems like you could easily respond to the points, if I am not even close.

First off he is nothing close to KH. Unless you think she was a capable 'leader'. Apparently no one else in the democrat party did as witnessed by her performance in her primaries. The only reason she was chosen was because she checked DEI boxes and she was insurance against someone taking a shot at Puddinhead.

If you still hold a grudge against things people say in a campaign about you, you will never form any kind of coalition or be effective in any government position. It seems that for the most part Trump moves on after the campaign and is willing to work with those he badmouthed or that badmouthed him in the heat of the battle. The ultimate test is Hillary although he didn't have to work with her. Why DIDN'T he lock her up. He certainly could have weaponized the DOJ and prosecuted her for communications violations. Those DESERVED prison time. He actually should have just told them to do their damned job, and she would be wearing orange right now.

I think Vance is pretty credible. Came up from humble beginnings and got a Yale JD. Started a business, etc etc... I don't like what he said about parents voting for children... I think that was massively stupid.

Impeachment is becoming as meaningless as being called a racist or a homophobe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary

VN Store



Back
Top