2024 Presidential Race

#36,627
#36,627
volfanhill said:
All it says, is that if you are ok with the person in power, then you are ok with them killing American citizens. You should probably reflect on that.
Click to expand...
His TDS makes that kind of reflection impossible. Hatred on the level he displays is mind boggling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, TN-POSSUM, marcusluvsvols and 1 other person
#36,630
#36,630
RockyTop85 said:
I’m sure there are some who do, particularly with the Supreme Court, I just don’t see them posted here (or anywhere else) very often.

When they are posted here, like the JD Vance couch fornication story, I don’t recall demands to “prove it isn’t true.”

The example given by @hUTch2002 was “Russia nonsense” which was itself a mischaracterization that was sold to people who wanted to believe it and/or were too lazy to read the Mueller report.

There’s a multi-hundred page QAnon thread on here. Some of those people were so entrenched that they refused to believe the pizza parlor didn’t have a basement even after one of them shot the place up and the police department said there was no basement.

A guy on here was proudly exclaiming that he was calling pharmacies to ask about the labels on their Covid vaccines because he and a dozen others bought into conspiracy theories about vaccine injuries.

The Paul Pelosi thread.

“The FBI tried to assassinate Trump at the Mar-a-lago raid.”

There are people who post that Ashley Biden diary meme every time the topic comes up. No telling how many believe that.

For a while, there was a narrative on the right that Section 230 made some platform/publisher distinction that allowed people to sue social media companies. It was so prevalent that as some point I made a post quoting case law from like 9 or 10 different circuit courts showing that that’s not how it works.

There was the Roger stone juror thing where he was supposed to get a new trial because she made some political Facebook posts.

They just form whatever narrative they want about the fraudulent electors scheme.

Then there’s the story about Tim Walz that had to be deleted yesterday.

There are a couple of Twitter re-posts a month at this point making wild, unsupported claims based on Jack Smith’s filings. Those aren’t even labeled “breaking” at this point, they’re “reminders” so apparently that narrative is established somewhere.

I’m sure “gullibility” would be more balanced in a more balanced forum, but it takes a special kind of stupid to read this forum and decide that’s a hill you want to die on.
Click to expand...

Instead of a long defensive word salad you could have just said:

”I don’t notice it when my people do it”
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, Vol since 77, hUTch2002 and 6 others
#36,631
#36,631
Not sure Tim is familiar with McDonalds ice cream machines nationally. Good chance it’s broken…irony, if this is his example of her early work ethic.

 
#36,633
#36,633
RockyTop85 said:
I’m sure there are some who do, particularly with the Supreme Court, I just don’t see them posted here (or anywhere else) very often.

When they are posted here, like the JD Vance couch fornication story, I don’t recall demands to “prove it isn’t true.”

The example given by @hUTch2002 was “Russia nonsense” which was itself a mischaracterization that was sold to people who wanted to believe it and/or were too lazy to read the Mueller report.

There’s a multi-hundred page QAnon thread on here. Some of those people were so entrenched that they refused to believe the pizza parlor didn’t have a basement even after one of them shot the place up and the police department said there was no basement.

A guy on here was proudly exclaiming that he was calling pharmacies to ask about the labels on their Covid vaccines because he and a dozen others bought into conspiracy theories about vaccine injuries.

The Paul Pelosi thread.

“The FBI tried to assassinate Trump at the Mar-a-lago raid.”

There are people who post that Ashley Biden diary meme every time the topic comes up. No telling how many believe that.

For a while, there was a narrative on the right that Section 230 made some platform/publisher distinction that allowed people to sue social media companies. It was so prevalent that as some point I made a post quoting case law from like 9 or 10 different circuit courts showing that that’s not how it works.

There was the Roger stone juror thing where he was supposed to get a new trial because she made some political Facebook posts.

They just form whatever narrative they want about the fraudulent electors scheme.

Then there’s the story about Tim Walz that had to be deleted yesterday.

There are a couple of Twitter re-posts a month at this point making wild, unsupported claims based on Jack Smith’s filings. Those aren’t even labeled “breaking” at this point, they’re “reminders” so apparently that narrative is established somewhere.

I’m sure “gullibility” would be more balanced in a more balanced forum, but it takes a special kind of stupid to read this forum and decide that’s a hill you want to die on.
Click to expand...
So you couldn’t find anything I fell for that isn’t true. Thanks for confirming.
 
#36,635
#36,635
RockyTop85 said:
I’m sure there are some who do, particularly with the Supreme Court, I just don’t see them posted here (or anywhere else) very often.

When they are posted here, like the JD Vance couch fornication story, I don’t recall demands to “prove it isn’t true.”

The example given by @hUTch2002 was “Russia nonsense” which was itself a mischaracterization that was sold to people who wanted to believe it and/or were too lazy to read the Mueller report.

There’s a multi-hundred page QAnon thread on here. Some of those people were so entrenched that they refused to believe the pizza parlor didn’t have a basement even after one of them shot the place up and the police department said there was no basement.

A guy on here was proudly exclaiming that he was calling pharmacies to ask about the labels on their Covid vaccines because he and a dozen others bought into conspiracy theories about vaccine injuries.

The Paul Pelosi thread.

“The FBI tried to assassinate Trump at the Mar-a-lago raid.”

There are people who post that Ashley Biden diary meme every time the topic comes up. No telling how many believe that.

For a while, there was a narrative on the right that Section 230 made some platform/publisher distinction that allowed people to sue social media companies. It was so prevalent that as some point I made a post quoting case law from like 9 or 10 different circuit courts showing that that’s not how it works.

There was the Roger stone juror thing where he was supposed to get a new trial because she made some political Facebook posts.

They just form whatever narrative they want about the fraudulent electors scheme.

Then there’s the story about Tim Walz that had to be deleted yesterday.

There are a couple of Twitter re-posts a month at this point making wild, unsupported claims based on Jack Smith’s filings. Those aren’t even labeled “breaking” at this point, they’re “reminders” so apparently that narrative is established somewhere.

I’m sure “gullibility” would be more balanced in a more balanced forum, but it takes a special kind of stupid to read this forum and decide that’s a hill you want to die on.
Click to expand...
It sounds like Kamala is getting your vote. The link below will get you to some really sound information about her and her policies.

Democratic Underground: Forums for U.S. Liberals and Democrats

www.democraticunderground.com www.democraticunderground.com
 
#36,637
#36,637
RockyTop85 said:
Idk why somebody who went all in on the counter narrative would try to blame another for believing the opposite.

Not sure I would call it gullibility, but there are at least 3 posts on this forum quoting 3 different right wing Twitter accounts that have all completely misstated the holding of yesterday’s Supreme Court case. Why do right wing influencers do this? Because there is an audience for it. People like @hUTch2002 believe what they want to believe, reality be damned.
Click to expand...

How short is your memory? The entire left (not just random Twitter accounts but the media, senators, etc) all acted as if the president could just murder his political opponents with immunity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, CobbVol, marcusluvsvols and 2 others
#36,639
#36,639
SpaceCoastVol said:
I don't know why those Beta cucks would need vasectomies.
Click to expand...

Not gonna get their hands pregnant.

Full disclosure: If the PP wants to set up tents in the parking lot and aid Dimwits/Communists in sterilization for free...I am all for it. No problem here with those adults removing themselves from the gene pool. The abortions are a whole different matter though. Plenty of folks out there willing to adopt those babies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and StarRaider
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top