2024 Presidential Race

May want to fast track, just answered that. But good to see you defend Trump and his actions, unless you condemn Harris and her actions.
If morals don't matter .... and at least with Trump, you have suggested that they don't .... then why bring up alleged infidelity of Harris? At the very least, you are showing a double standard here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: swampfoxfan
If morals don't matter .... and at least with Trump, you have suggested that they don't .... then why bring up alleged infidelity of Harris? At the very least, you are showing a double standard here.
Which affair was used for political gain? I missed it. As I said, my life was more comfortable with immoral Trump than it is with side-chick Harris. But please, defend Harris while condemning Trump if we are discussing double standard.

Waiting to hear your term for Harris as that is the theme.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85

Malik Obama says half-brother Barack is ‘still running the country’ — and warns he would have ‘a big role to play’ in Harris presidency​



Abon’go Malik Obama believes his half-brother former President Barack Obama is “still running the country” — and would have “a big role to play” if Vice President Kamala Harris wins the 2024 election.

Malik — who was best man at Barack’s wedding but has since parted ways with the 44th president — told The Post that his relative made “everything flip” in July, when he swapped out President Biden for Harris as the Democratic nominee, without a single primary vote being cast.

“Definitely he had something to do with it. … He’s still running the Democratic Party, and he’s still running the country behind closed doors,” he said of his estranged half-brother. “He’s going to be extremely influential in whatever goes on should they win.”

1727732659194.png

Asked whether Harris and Obama colluded on the Biden ouster and remain in contact, Malik responded: “I’m sure that they are talking almost every day.”

 
Not sure you’re well versed on the criteria of a nun or chastity. How do I refer to Donald? He’s an immoral man when it comes to his marriages. Show me where I’ve singed off on his morals? My life was more comfortable under his leadership, don’t confuse the two.

Morals for the Oval Office left officially when a cigar entered an intern.
Or back to JFK.
But like you say, personal morality is nice to have but not indicative of how the President will preform. Jimmy Carter, probably the best and most upright President of my lifetime was a terrible President. Meanwhile, Bill Clinton, with all of his personal indiscretions, turned out to be a pretty solid one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zues1
Or back to JFK.
But like you say, personal morality is nice to have but not indicative of how the President will preform. Jimmy Carter, probably the best and most upright President of my lifetime was a terrible President. Meanwhile, Bill Clinton, with all of his personal indiscretions, turned out to be a pretty solid one.
The days of Ward Clever candidates are over.
 
Which affair was used for political gain? I missed it. As I said, my life was more comfortable with immoral Trump than it is with side-chick Harris. But please, defend Harris while condemning Trump if we are discussing double standard.

Waiting to hear your term for Harris as that is the theme.
So having multiple affairs isn't as bad as someone having one affair, because it was perceived to be for political gain? I thought the affair, itself, is the immoral act. Is there some logical reasoning with your qualifier?
 
  • Like
Reactions: swampfoxfan
So having multiple affairs isn't as bad as someone having one affair, because it was perceived to be for political gain? I thought the affair, itself, is the immoral act. Is there some logical reasoning with your qualifier?
Would you allow your spouse to have one or multiple?
 
Which affair was used for political gain? I missed it. As I said, my life was more comfortable with immoral Trump than it is with side-chick Harris. But please, defend Harris while condemning Trump if we are discussing double standard.

Waiting to hear your term for Harris as that is the theme.
I don't want to spend much time on this, because I don't know what happened (neither do you), but it is fair to at least say that the facts are in dispute as to whether or not Willie Brown was still with his wife at the time the affair occurred. Also, Willie Brown had not yet become the Mayor of San Francisco at the time of the affair either.


^^^^ Click on this link for the facts. ^^^^

Whether you realize it or not .... you are defending Trump but condemning Harris, by trying to make hers (assuming that it even was an extramarital affair - that is a matter of dispute) sound worse than his because of an alleged motive.
 
I don't want to spend much time on this, because I don't know what happened (neither do you), but it is fair to at least say that the facts are in dispute as to whether or not Willie Brown was still with his wife at the time the affair occurred.


^^^^ Click on this link for the facts. ^^^^

Whether you realize it or not .... you are defending Trump but condemning Harris, by trying to make hers (assuming that it even was an extramarital affair - that is a matter of dispute) sound worse than his because of an alleged motive.
Was he divorced? It’s a yes/no.


I’m sorry, please direct me where I defended Trump and his affairs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USF grad in TN
Was he divorced? It’s a yes/no.
I don't know and neither do you .... Even if Brown and his wife had just been separated for ten years .... after that much time, it is a stretch to call Harris a "side chick." Depending on what she knew, I'm not even sure that I would call it adultery on her part. It's possible that after such a long separation she assumed that he was divorced.

It is also a stretch to keep insisting this was happened for political gain. Brown had not yet been the Mayor of San Francisco. You have over-played your hand with this for months now. It is incredible how much you have posted about something so innocuous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: swampfoxfan
I don't know and neither do you .... Even if Brown and his wife had just been separated for ten years .... after that much time, it is a stretch to call Harris a "side chick." Depending on what she knew, I'm not even sure that I would call it adultery on her part. It's possible that after such a long separation she assumed that he was divorced.

It is also a stretch to keep insisting this was happened for political gain. Brown had not yet been the Mayor of San Francisco. You have over-played your hand with this for months now. It is incredible how much you have posted about something so innocuous.
You must of missed this part.

“Although Brown was legally married at the time, he had reportedly been estranged from his wife, Blanche Brown, since 1981, according to People magazine ( here;”

You may want to revise your first line to “We both know”
 
Which affair was used for political gain? I missed it. As I said, my life was more comfortable with immoral Trump than it is with side-chick Harris. But please, defend Harris while condemning Trump if we are discussing double standard.

Waiting to hear your term for Harris as that is the theme.
Easy answer they are both Whores, man whore and woman whore. That is a good way to look at these two, nobody cares anymore about this, so why bother. Still doesn't make either one more unfit or fit for office. Plenty of other faults to disqualify.
 
Easy answer they are both Whores, man whore and woman whore. That is a good way to look at these two, nobody cares anymore about this, so why bother. Still doesn't make either one more unfit or fit for office. Plenty of other faults to disqualify.
Where would Harris be without it? I feel confident in saying it helped her political career.
 
Where would Harris be without it? I feel confident in saying it helped her political career.
who really knows, feeling and thinking don't cut it. Neither does you confident judgement.
or do you speak from experience with her or your own job performance.
 
who really knows, feeling and thinking don't cut it. Neither does you confident judgement.
or do you speak from experience with her or your own job performance.
I feel confident in saying it launched her career. Why else have an affair with the mayor who could be your dads age. You can assume it didn’t.
 
You must of missed this part.

“Although Brown was legally married at the time, he had reportedly been estranged from his wife, Blanche Brown, since 1981, according to People magazine ( here;”

You may want to revise your first line to “We both know”
Admittedly, I didn't read it. I don't consider it important at all.

However, even with that being the case .... it is stupid how much you have talked about this. After that long a separation, I'm not sure that I would refer to this as adultery on the part of Harris. Did she know that he was still legally married? Ten years is a long separation.

You talk about this almost every day. It's unclear if she even did anything wrong at all. He wasn't yet the Mayor of San Francisco, as you have constantly suggested he was.
 

VN Store



Back
Top