2024 Presidential Race

#53,653
#53,653
McDad said:
...And I don't see how we can possibly know that, either. We can make a lot of assumptions but we don't really know the dynamics of the situation.
Click to expand...
Correct. We can make a lot of very well founded assumptions and deduce the reasoning for her refusing. But we can't make precise declarations which would require unimpeachable evidence. Going on his show would've been lights out for her. How fortuitous for her that she just couldn't make it happen, but made it look like she tried.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kristy* and rekinhavoc
#53,654
#53,654
Grand Vol said:
Well, he's not a reporter, so, I'm not sure why you keep using this "interview" word like he's going to publish it after editing. Again, he's free form... he asks a question then goes on a 10 minute discussion with multiple tangents. Then posts without editing in is raw form.

Her campaign is scared to put her in an environment where they don't know what's coming next. And second, the whole "the mountain must come to Moses" thing is stupid. You and I both know they can control the process if they control the location.

Say what you want about Trump, he's not afraid to do any interview. After her disasters with even so called "friendly" networks like CNN, they don't want her in any position where she's going to have to think on her feet.
Click to expand...

Because it's an interview. LOL. I don't see the word "reporter" in the definition of interview. I don't see the word "publish" either.

JFC, what a waste of time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RockyTop85
#53,655
#53,655
BowlBrother85 said:
The only people who would complain about something this trite, are people who have already made up their minds to dislike her anyway.
Click to expand...
Who is complaining? She's a moron for passing up the opportunity to be on his podcast, particularly after Trump got so many views on his appearance. However, it isn't surprising. Rogan's style doesn't align with her basement campaign strategy, and he won't edit all her idiotic answers to make her sound better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kristy*, dovervolz, TN-POSSUM and 5 others
#53,657
#53,657
n_huffhines said:
Because it's an interview. LOL. I don't see the word "reporter" in the definition of interview. I don't see the word "publish" either.

JFC, what a waste of time.
Click to expand...

But it's not an interview...

Can you tell me the time Anderson Cooper talked about MMA fighters with any Presidential candidate?

I'll wait.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol since 77 and rekinhavoc
#53,658
#53,658
BowlBrother85 said:
The only people who would complain about something this trite, are people who have already made up their minds to dislike her anyway.
Click to expand...
I think we actually agree that it’s too late in the game. Election Day is next week. Is there that much either candidate could do to win over an undecided voter? Or sway someone to their side? Maybe.

I think what candidates should be doing at this stage is rallying their supporters to actually participate in the process and vote. I’ve got a bunch of Trump loving friends. Yet to my knowledge, they didn’t vote early and probably won’t vote next Tuesday. Sharing pro-Trump clips isn’t voting. That’s the pitch right now. Go vote.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85 and rekinhavoc
#53,660
#53,660
OrangeTsar said:
After seeing how 60 Minutes edits „interviews“; I agree he doesn’t need any excuses. He would have to be crazy to go in for one
Click to expand...
Trump is just as guilty of doing mostly "friendly" sit-downs with opinion show hosts. There is a very clear double-standard among the peanut gallery on here.
 
#53,663
#53,663
SamRebel35 said:
Correct. We can make a lot of very well founded assumptions and deduce the reasoning for her refusing. But we can't make precise declarations which would require unimpeachable evidence. Going on his show would've been lights out for her. How fortuitous for her that she just couldn't make it happen, but made it look like she tried.
Click to expand...
Absolutely. It was opinion based on Harris's difficulties with interviews.
 
#53,665
#53,665
Muslim guy on CNN who has called for the stoning of gays calls someone a Nazi.

They respond with “I hope your beeper doesn’t go off”

lol and only one of the two is now banned from CNN
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaybird_1981
#53,667
#53,667
hog88 said:
I missed your posts calling Biden a sicko.

Besides if you’ve ever tried to give a squirming toddler a sugar on the cheek it’s not uncommon to miss.
Click to expand...
If the kid was squirming he definitely should have put her down. that makes it even worse.
 
#53,668
#53,668


Check out the comments on this video. Its just like the one I saw the other day. I had to scroll down thru at least 100 comments to get to the 1st person who was NOT voting for Trump. That same ratio continued through hundreds of comments. Less than 1% Harris. The video is completely neutral btw...and is extremely pessimistic pertaining to Trump IMO.

Another thing that will catch your attention is how many comments are from registered Dimwits saying they voted Trump. Whole families of Dimwits. Lots of independents too. I think Trump wins the popular vote outright...and the election in the widest margin since Reagan barring insane levels of fraud.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN-POSSUM, UT_Dutchman and rekinhavoc
#53,674
#53,674
LouderVol said:
I will be interested to see how this one turns out. There were some of the AI deepfakes of ballot boxes being destroyed in Pennsylvania too a couple days ago.
Click to expand...

Looks like that's from an ABC broadcast. Two now have happened in the PNW

apnews.com

Fires set in drop boxes destroy hundreds of ballots in Washington and damage 3 in Oregon

Incendiary devices have been set off at two ballot drop boxes — one in Portland, Oregon, and another in nearby Vancouver, Washington — in what one official called a “direct attack on democracy."
apnews.com apnews.com
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top