- CV19 does not pose serious risk to the younger, healthy population
- closing down schools and extracurricular activities will not end a respiratory pandemic and will cause a number of harmful effects on children (educational loss, mental health problems, decreased physical fitness)
- the wiser initial approach should have been to protect those at risk while allowing the young/healthy population to develop natural immunity, hopefully shortening the pandemic and decreasing the opportunity for variants to emerge
- mRNA shots will not eliminate a respiratory virus nor prevent mutations, and they could even increase the development of new variants
- mRNA shots have both known and possibly unknown adverse effects
- cloth and surgical masks do not effectively stop the transmission of respiratory viruses, and they may cause adverse effects if worn for prolonged amounts of time
- the CV19 virus had very strange features, and both these and its area of origin strongly suggest that it was engineered
- our own government and its agencies have repeatedly lied about the origin of the virus, control methods, the testing and safety of vaccines, and the eventual outcome of the pandemic
- several safe treatment modalities have been shown to effective in certain trials, but they have been disparaged and mislabeled by the government, largely due to influence by large pharmaceutical corporations
- ivermectin is an extremely safe medication, won the nobel prize for treatment of human parasitic infections, has previously been shown to have antiviral properties, and could be useful in treating CV19 infection