2024 Presidential Race

So someone who Trump wants to withhold funding from doesn't like him? Wow. Breaking news

Trump wants to withhold money from Clark? Huh--does he owe Clark money?

Clark's comment has nothing to do with NATO funding and everything to do with this deranged clown who likes Russia more than our allies.
Thanks for trying, Earl.
 
You seem to forget, Earl, that the bill was mostly the work of a Republican--and the Republicans wanted a bill. You guys miss the mark on EVERYTHING.
And? That's the difference between you communists and the rest of us. You march in lockstep with whatever you are told. we actually think and vote accordingly. In other words, your perspective is that everything your party proposes is good, therefore you must vote for it. I don't believe that nor do most republicans.
 
And? That's the difference between you communists and the rest of us. You march in lockstep with whatever you are told. we actually think and vote accordingly. In other words, your perspective is that everything your party proposes is good, therefore you must vote for it. I don't believe that nor do most republicans.

Are you not able to read? It was a bipartisan bill. Do you know the meaning of that word? One of the leading authors of the bill was a Republican. Your comment, per usual, makes no sense.
 
And? That's the difference between you communists and the rest of us. You march in lockstep with whatever you are told. we actually think and vote accordingly. In other words, your perspective is that everything your party proposes is good, therefore you must vote for it. I don't believe that nor do most republicans.
Agreed, as Republicans and even as Conservatives, we don't agree on everything, and sometimes our people do goof up, and they don't do what we voted them in for them to do, or don't do it the way we want them to do it, or the delivery is off, etc etc, and I think we can admit that
 
And? That's the difference between you communists and the rest of us. You march in lockstep with whatever you are told. we actually think and vote accordingly. In other words, your perspective is that everything your party proposes is good, therefore you must vote for it. I don't believe that nor do most republicans.
What a load. LOL
 
Are you not able to read? It was a bipartisan bill. Do you know the meaning of that word? One of the leading authors of the bill was a Republican. Your comment, per usual, makes no sense.
Of course it doesn't because you can't read for content. I'll type more slowly for you though. Just because a Republican was a coauthor doesn't mean it is a good bill.
 
So someone who Trump wants to withhold funding from doesn't like him? Wow. Breaking news
Donald Trump's comments were irrational. They should unnerve anyone with common sense.

Insisting that our fellow NATO members pay their fair share is great. Even threatening an American withdraw from NATO is not out of bounds. Trump did much more than that, however. Trump said that he would encourage Russia to attack an ally of the United States over unpaid fees, and "do whatever the hell they wanted to them." That is just plain crazy.

... and I don't think there is ANYTHING Trump could say at a rally that wouldn't be met with a thunderous applause.
 
Agreed, as Republicans and even as Conservatives, we don't agree on everything, and sometimes our people do goof up, and they don't do what we voted them in for them to do, or don't do it the way we want them to do it, or the delivery is off, etc etc, and I think we can admit that
Can you explain why Trump's remarks at the rally in South Carolina, where he said that he would "encourage" Russia to attack a fellow NATO member and "do whatever the hell they wanted to with them," if they weren't paying their fees was met with a standing ovation from the crowd? That was weird.

If the principles of Republican voters were as intellectually independent of their party's leadership, and superior to those of Democrats as you wish to believe, you would not be nominating this irrational lunatic for the 3rd straight Presidential Election cycle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
Can you explain why Trump's remarks at the rally in South Carolina, where he said that he would "encourage" Russia to attack a fellow NATO member and "do whatever the hell they wanted to with them," if they weren't paying their fees was met with a standing ovation from the crowd? That was weird.

If the principles of Republican voters were as intellectually independent of their party's leadership, and superior to those of Democrats as you wish to believe, you would not be nominating this irrational lunatic for the 3rd straight Presidential Election cycle.
Go watch the Super Bowl with the rest of us lol...we are watching JJ kick butt
 

VN Store



Back
Top