I don't think ranking services are fail proof...the just assess what the player's potential is at the next level. Sometimes they get it right, sometimes they get it wrong. I think it's safe to say though that the upper tier is pretty clear cut. Players that are consensus top 5-10 players across all of the rating services are more likely than not going to be impact players very early on. There will always be players like Rae who take a few years to get going, but the top tier of ranked players will most likely be "college ready" players once they step on campus.I wish I could like this more than once !!!!!
Another example : I got interested in Hamilton Heights when Kamilla Carodosa was a freshman/ sophomore. Her teammates Balogun , and Jaz , and Treasure we’re getting recognized by recruiting services but Kamilla ( at first) was not even listed !!! But she had what you cannot coach (6’6”) and some agility! She looked like an Antelope running up and down the court and I don’t mean this in a good way . I believe it took her till her Junior year to get noticed . And even then one service did not even list her at all ? But ended up as a top 5—10 ranked player and is now being talked about as a national championship maker for some schools !
Rae is one of my favorite players to make the services questioning their ratings! I could see her abilities from day one , but what a train wreck until she started to slow down and let the game come to her ..... Obviously improving her shooting comes with practice and effort to improve! These ranking services tend to look at numbers , percentages , rebounds, even judging players by height and weight ?![]()
I’ll end this rant with a favorite of mine .
“ It’s not the size of the dog in the fight ,
but the size of the fight in the dog !” JMO