3 seed is indefensible…shame on selection committee!!

#26
#26
The committee uses whatever words they wish to justify each years seedings. And the metrics change every year to suit their agenda. Placing Duke at a 2 is shameful and no one can even find any framework to justify that. Pitiful

They did it just to show grace to coach K. Still should not happen, but that is what happened IMO.
 
#34
#34
A fairy tale team, 1st time in the tournament and Sister Jean again, add Villinova and they threw the book at them. Commentators don't understand it. OK, play with a chip.
 
#44
#44
I gotta ask you fellas a serious question - what do you care about that seed ?? Looks like we got a cakewalk all the way to final 8, and I like our shot to final four from where we are - in fact I think we got as easy a road as one could wish for.
Is the two seed a ding on your pride ?
Because otherwise, being upset that KY got a better seed seems silly to me - but that’s just me.
They are Kentucky and we are not. This is basketball. They outta get the nod. Same as in football if it were Bama.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JCVOL
#48
#48
I gotta ask you fellas a serious question - what do you care about that seed ?? Looks like we got a cakewalk all the way to final 8, and I like our shot to final four from where we are - in fact I think we got as easy a road as one could wish for.
Is the two seed a ding on your pride ?
Because otherwise, being upset that KY got a better seed seems silly to me - but that’s just me.
They are Kentucky and we are not. This is basketball. They outta get the nod. Same as in football if it were Bama.

We beat Kentucky TWICE and had a better resume.

What’s so hard to understand about that?
 

VN Store



Back
Top