Forever151
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
- Messages
- 4,447
- Likes
- 2,336
Well here we go . I’m not sure how true this is but it’s from a well respected LGBTQ tiktoker but apparently they plan on looking into 303 Creative LLC vs Elenis.This was used to prevent discrimination by businesses towards LGBTQ members
Private means privately owned. Not owned by government.Your going to open a big can of worms . That’s all I’m going to say . Also it’s Public Business not private
Your going to open a big can of worms . That’s all I’m going to say . Also it’s Public Business not private
Because I wouldn’t be fine with someone saying only trans or gay people can enter somewhere either ,She is a private business owner. Here is the question, why would you open up a can of worms? If a person wanted to open a business that only serviced say trans or gay people, that would be absolutely fine. So what’s wrong with this? She should be able to do what she wants with her business. Why do you have a problem with this?
The actual court ruling was for public businesses . I think Private business can do what they wantShe is a private business owner. Here is the question, why would you open up a can of worms? If a person wanted to open a business that only serviced say trans or gay people, that would be absolutely fine. So what’s wrong with this? She should be able to do what she wants with her business. Why do you have a problem with this?
I have no problem with businesses making a decision like this... on an individual level. The problem that I have seen over the last 2+ years is when businesses collude with one another or if they are working in concert with the govt. But as far as this is concerned, the LGBTQ customers were not being locked out of having this service provided to them. There were I'm sure other avenues and businesses that could have filled their needs.Strongly disagree . I believe this is once again rewinding time .
No problem except you want to execute those business workers you disagree withI have no problem with businesses making a decision like this... on an individual level. The problem that I have seen over the last 2+ years is when businesses collude with one another or if they are working in concert with the govt. But as far as this is concerned, the LGBTQ customers were not being locked out of having this service provided to them. There were I'm sure other avenues and businesses that could have filled their needs.
Huh? We operate under CMS and JC guidelines and regulations but so what? We do exactly what we plan to do 95% of the time without any issues. I don’t know what you are getting atIf hospitals are taking government funds, which they all do, then they and their employees forfeit many of their rights.
I know you feel that way about those on welfare or taking government benefits, no?