4.8 seconds?

#6
#6
Someone needs to put a stopwatch on it; had to take 6-7 seconds.

My guess is that the clock started a couple of seconds late.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobbyutvol
#8
#8
College Basketball just sucks now considering how bad officiating ruins the flow of the game.
 
#13
#13
Don't get me wrong, I hate losing, especially to Vandy, but I'd rather hit the bump in the road now and get it corrected than cruise into the NCAAs and hit it blind.
 
#15
#15
Yeah it is what it is but in the broadcast I feel like they froze it at 4.5 and he was calling a TO. Not sure where they came up with 4.8.
 
#16
#16
You could just see it in vescovi's eyes he was going to miss that free throw, he just had a weird look on his face.
 
#18
#18
I looked at the replay and the start of the clock on the inbound was reasonable.

What surprised me is that they didn't take more time to review if the shooter got the shot off in time. It was about as close one could possibly be when the ball left his hand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: robed20
#19
#19
Just watched a replay. The clock was fine. One thing I did notice is how crazy slow Nkamhoua was switching on the ball screen. I know the Vandy player was a lot faster, but ZZ got hung up and ON didn't even slow the guy down and just let him turn the corner. That's what forced the defense to collapse and leave a shooter open. If ON can just make the ballhandler take one more step, the whole rhythm of that play is different.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfaninky
#20
#20
Just watched a replay. The clock was fine. One thing I did notice is how crazy slow Nkamhoua was switching on the ball screen. I know the Vandy player was a lot faster, but ZZ got hung up and ON didn't even slow the guy down and just let him turn the corner. That's what forced the defense to collapse and leave a shooter open. If ON can just make the ballhandler take one more step, the whole rhythm of that play is different.
Hindsight, but letting him score two is better than leaving a three shooter wide open.

1675970908408.png
 
#21
#21
Hindsight, but letting his score is better than leaving a shooter wide open.

View attachment 535422
True . . . but the point is that ON has to hedge that handoff/screen and make the ballhandler get wide rather than just stand there and let him go downhill. It's pretty easy to see why Vescovi ran to help from the back side. I think everybody on the floor was surprised when the Vandy guy threw the hammer pass with 1.5 to go rather than shooting it himself when at the rim.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Volfan1000
#22
#22
True . . . but the point is that ON has to hedge that handoff/screen and make the ballhandler get wide rather than just stand there and let him go downhill. It's pretty easy to see why Vescovi ran to help from the back side. I think everybody on the floor was surprised when the Vandy guy threw the hammer pass with 1.5 to go rather than shooting it himself when at the rim.

Yep. if the guy misses the open 3, then the whole conversation today was why did the Vandy player pass up an open layup to the tie game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfaninky
#23
#23
Has anyone checked the replay for when the clock was started? Is it possible really to do all that in 4.8 seconds??

I was at game and felt like the last 5 fouls they got a really quick clock operator on every one of them and nothing was reviewed until Vandy needed .8 more.
I did. It was the correct call.
 
#24
#24
I did. It was the correct call.
Clock started as soon as big guy touched it? And yet he came down and then passed it to someone else who made a move and drove to the basket and passed it to someone else 25ft away and he shot it in 4.7 seconds? No way that clock started on time
 
  • Like
Reactions: feathersax

VN Store



Back
Top