Pacer92
Youneverknow
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2009
- Messages
- 15,826
- Likes
- 18,572
I think 911 really happened.. Out
1: twin towers hit by planes in specific, pre determined areas. Building 7 had the safes looted and was intentionally took down to destroy records of malpractice by the large firms and banks profiting off prior knowledge and cover theirselves on illegal business practices unrelated to 9/11
2: shot by missle. Destroyed records that the department did not want to get out regarding where the unaccounted money had gone and what is used for. Was also under construction prior and more info could have been moved to the area for destruction
3: shot down. Only a very very select few would have had knowledge and could not have ordered a stand down without a huge red flag, or more plausibly, they weren't in the know
4: Saudi terrorists
5:Yasin al-qadi, marsh and meclennan, small group of top world businessmen, dick Cheney
6: back door deal with the Saudis orchestrated by al-qadi to get us in to the Middle East. Saudi Arabia was able to make great profits and wanted Saddam out of the Middle East, he was the greatest threat to their and Iran's power and influence in the area
After impact it is as simple as all that gas burning and heating metal to the point of structural failure. End of discussion.
Saudi Arabia = Our ally
Pearl Harbor was bombed by The Japanese... so we declared war on Korea.
Saudis fly planes into Twin Towers... so we attack Afghanistan.
Did the Saudi government approve of the attack? Or was our merely Saudi citizens that helped?
Surely you aren't dumb enough that you can't make the distinction.
That is where the discussion begins because jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel and at the very worst, it would have yielded, but what we saw on 9/11 was metal collapsing like cinder blocks after a martial artist chops the boards. Also, explain how asymmetrical damage results in symmetrical failure?
Saudi Arabia = Our ally
Pearl Harbor was bombed by The Japanese... so we declared war on Korea.
Saudis fly planes into Twin Towers... so we attack Afghanistan.
Is there any doubt at this point that there actually was a conspiracy surrounding 9/11 now that The Saudis have confessed to having some damaging information within the missing 28 pages?
Shouldn't we at this point doubt the entire narrative about jets bringing down towers?
That is where the discussion begins because jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel and at the very worst, it would have yielded, but what we saw on 9/11 was metal collapsing like cinder blocks after a martial artist chops the boards. Also, explain how asymmetrical damage results in symmetrical failure?
Is there any doubt at this point that there actually was a conspiracy surrounding 9/11 now that The Saudis have confessed to having some damaging information within the missing 28 pages?
Shouldn't we at this point doubt the entire narrative about jets bringing down towers?