9/11 Conspiracy Thread

[LouderVol]

I had a guy that told me about a friend of his that swears no pilot could fly accurately enough to have hit those buildings.

He's right.

Finding the first three third and centerline of a runway is pure luck. <-blue

i hope you never lose your lucky rabbit foot. I would hate if your luck ran out and something happened.

 

[GoBigOrangeUT]

I had a guy that told me about a friend of his that swears no pilot could fly accurately enough to have hit those buildings.

He's right.

Finding the first three third and centerline of a runway is pure luck. <-blue

Exactly.

Pilots, scientists, engineers, eye witnesses and literally anybody with common sense are wrong. It makes much more sense that there is a unprecedented cover-up!

 

[GoBigOrangeUT]

Does it look like glass and air? Gtfo dude...

You gonna answer the questions?

 

[bamawriter]

Does it look like glass and air? Gtfo dude...

Is it so hard to answer my question? It didn't seem like a difficult question when I asked it.

 

[GoBigOrangeUT]

Is it so hard to answer my question? It didn't seem like a difficult question when I asked it.

Give him a second. He is perusing the latest tin foil hat blog.

 

[Pacer92]

You gonna answer the questions?

Did you ask one?

 

[GoBigOrangeUT]

Did you ask one?

If it was a military aircraft, why were there civilians on it?

 

[LouderVol]

for the record the exterior of the WTCs was somewhere around 40 steel to 60 percent glass. I forget what the exact percentage was. there is a lot more steel on the outside so that there were no interior columns.

 

[Obsessed]

16 feet?

firetrucks must be tiny up there in DC.

and you know the pentagon is a multilayered bunker built to withstand direct attacks? and its sectioned off to limit damage? I know its crazy but us builders know what the crap we are doing, especially when there is money available to do it right.

The initial hole from impact was 16 foot. The rest of the damage is from fire.

 

[bamawriter]

for the record the exterior of the WTCs was somewhere around 40 steel to 60 percent glass. I forget what the exact percentage was. there is a lot more steel on the outside so that there were no interior columns.

You're a sheep! SHEEEEEEP!!!!

 

[LouderVol]

The initial hole from impact was 16 foot. The rest of the damage is from fire.

I am still going to need to see this "16 feet"

 

[hndog609]

I am still going to need to see this "16 feet"

Here's one of about a gazillion explanations about that little myth. This is of course one of the little ones...much more detailed ones exist.

When American Airlines Flight 77 hit the Pentagon's exterior wall, Ring E, it created a hole approximately 75 ft. wide, according to the ASCE Pentagon Building Performance Report. The exterior facade collapsed about 20 minutes after impact, but ASCE based its measurements of the original hole on the number of first-floor support columns that were destroyed or damaged. Computer simulations confirmed the findings.Why wasn't the hole as wide as a 757's 124-ft.-10-in. wingspan? A crashing jet doesn't punch a cartoon-like outline of itself into a reinforced concrete building, says ASCE team member Mete Sozen, a professor of structural engineering at Purdue University. In this case, one wing hit the ground; the other was sheared off by the force of the impact with the Pentagon's load-bearing columns, explains Sozen, who specializes in the behavior of concrete buildings. What was left of the plane flowed into the structure in a state closer to a liquid than a solid mass. "If you expected the entire wing to cut into the building," Sozen tells PM, "it didn't happen."
The tidy hole in Ring C was 12 ft. wide—not 16 ft. ASCE concludes it was made by the jet's landing gear, not by the fuselage.

It's all the same crap that comes up over and over and over again and it's all been answered. Nothing can't be scientifically explained and the majority flat out has been explained. The people that don't like the answers at this point are simply enjoying the mental masturbation of feeling "more enlightened".

 

[Obsessed]

Here's one of about a gazillion explanations about that little myth. This is of course one of the little ones...much more detailed ones exist.



It's all the same crap that comes up over and over and over again and it's all been answered. Nothing can't be scientifically explained and the majority flat out has been explained. The people that don't like the answers at this point are simply enjoying the mental masturbation of feeling "more enlightened".

I like to mental masturbate....




I watched a documentary on it. They had graphs, charts, and some other neat stuff.

 

[LouderVol]

Here's one of about a gazillion explanations about that little myth. This is of course one of the little ones...much more detailed ones exist.



It's all the same crap that comes up over and over and over again and it's all been answered. Nothing can't be scientifically explained and the majority flat out has been explained. The people that don't like the answers at this point are simply enjoying the mental masturbation of feeling "more enlightened".

liked for "mental masturbation". also for the science, but mostly for the use of mental masturbation.

 

[jvol1]

So basically it was the aliens. But if so, where are the survivors now?

 

[joevol33]

I like this thread

 

[Pacer92]

Here's one of about a gazillion explanations about that little myth. This is of course one of the little ones...much more detailed ones exist.



It's all the same crap that comes up over and over and over again and it's all been answered. Nothing can't be scientifically explained and the majority flat out has been explained. The people that don't like the answers at this point are simply enjoying the mental masturbation of feeling "more enlightened".

So, from what I gather....these planes could punch out cartoon like shapes in one building, but not the other, correct?

 

[SaluteToTheHill]

I like this thread

All these controversial political threads are hilarious to read. What ever happened to therealUT?

 

[LouderVol]

All these controversial political threads are hilarious to read. What ever happened to therealUT?

went back to the mothership imo.

 

[joevol33]

All these controversial political threads are hilarious to read. What ever happened to therealUT?

Not sure.

 

[LouderVol]

So, from what I gather....these planes could punch out cartoon like shapes in one building, but not the other, correct?

steel vs concrete. steel will maintain its shape when weakened, concrete not so much. basic understanding of materials dude.

 

[bamawriter]

So, from what I gather....these planes could punch out cartoon like shapes in one building, but not the other, correct?

I don't recall any cartoon like shapes in any of the three buildings. It's not like the perfect silhouette of a plane was visible in the WTC towers.

 

[Obsessed]

All these controversial political threads are hilarious to read. What ever happened to therealUT?

Very busy man. Works for a think tank and also consults for the military (I think) on various strategies for war.

 

[SaluteToTheHill]

Very busy man. Works for a think tank and also consults for the military (I think) on various strategies for war.

God help us if that's true...

 

[Pacer92]

Where is all the debris?