KoachKrab127
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2009
- Messages
- 4,761
- Likes
- 5,552
Tom Osborne last game. Ahman Green. Prove manning shouldn’t have won heisman and reinforce Woodson/Michigan. That game was over before it started.
Sorry. Bad post. I was pointing out that there was no way Tennessee was winning that day. Too many counter narratives.Oh I forgot Peyton missed all those tackles. Michigan played ONE Game (as usual) and you think woodson deserved the heistman off that one game? He didn't even have 20 solo tackles on the season. Total Buffalo chips.
A lot of people think that the 98 Ohio State was the best team that season . They just happened to get upset by Michigan State. A MSU team coached by this little unknown guy at the time.That and Outzen beat a damn good #4 Florida team just fine. He was way more mobile than Weinke. If they beat Florida they were good enough to beat us. I do think Ohio State might’ve been slightly better but Weinke being out didn’t have as much impact as people think.
It’s that simple. Tennessee was the 2nd best team in the country. Just could not beat Florida. In 98 when we beat Florida, we all knew we had basically won the National Championship.Is it really that simple? Do you think 97 Vols could have won a bowl game at the end of the season against Nebraska or Michigan if the stakes were higher?
Volunteers should have won nattys in 1997 and 1999 as well.Happy Off-season!
The anniversary of our 98 natty was yesterday (Jan 4th) and it got me to thinking. Why did the 98 team win the title and the 97 team didn't? I was in the opening decade of my life in 98, so I only only vaguely remember what it was like to watch it on TV live. This also means I don't have a strong grasp on the differences in rosters between the two seasons, or the strength of the opponents those years. I know that Florida State played a backup QB, which may have made a difference, especially since Wienke was a great college players and Outzen threw a pick 6, which might have been the difference by the end of the game.
I went to whatifsports.com, which is a simulator, and I simulated the 97 team against the 98 team. I simulated the game five times, and the 97 team won all five games, and honestly it wasn't particularly close (screenshots attached). I know it's just a simulator, but...
So, enlighten me. What were the main differences between 97 and 98, and how was the 98 team able to do what the 97 team couldn't.
Except in 97 the Vols weren’t the second best team. Nebraska and Florida proved that.It’s that simple. Tennessee was the 2nd best team in the country. Just could not beat Florida. In 98 when we beat Florida, we all knew we had basically won the National Championship.
I think the first time in 98 that I really thought we had a legit shot at being champions was when we beat Georgia. The week prior we had lost Jamal Lewis to injury and Georgia looked very impressive, beating LSU. I didn't think we had a prayer against Georgia but our defense dominated them. Ill never forget hearing Larry Munson say "theyre just better than we are!" LOL! That's when it finally dawned on me that "hey, we are a really good football team!"Retrospectively, the 1997 season was a rare season. The level of football was better than any other in the 90s IMHO. I would take the top four regular season teams: Nebraska, Michigan, Tennessee, and FSU against any of the teams that decade other than maybe 95 Nebraska. Last year was the same way. I’d take the top 6 teams from last year against anyone in the top four this year and never lose. Our best season was one year off. Last years team was so much better than what we have to watch or not watch tomorrow night.
When you get beat by 25 points, you got your azz whooped and it's best just to admit it rather than drag out a conspiracy theory narrative. I think all fans including ours have picked up some bad habits from Bama fans over the years. Bama has never lost a game that wasn't the result of some conspiracy/cheating against them. Suffice it to say, don't be like the Bammers.Tom Osborne last game. Ahman Green. Prove manning shouldn’t have won heisman and reinforce Woodson/Michigan. That game was over before it started.
No Lewis or Wilson for UT in that game. We had injuries too.There are always efforts by haters to discredit whatever team wins the national championship. The truth is almost every team that has won it has had some twist in the course of the season which could be construed as good fortune. The Outzen thing is one such hater narrative. He didn't suck by any means as you point out, and injuries are part of the game. We won, the national champion was clad in big orange that year, end of story.
UT lost at home to a Freshman QB and a 1st year head coach. The 2001 team roster-wise was solid except for LB and part of the OL and DB group. But they were lazy as hell at times. Go look at the scores that year.The 2001 team was maybe as good as that one, IMO, which is why the game that shall not be spoken of still makes me so angry.
I thought preseason 99 was the bestHappy Off-season!
The anniversary of our 98 natty was yesterday (Jan 4th) and it got me to thinking. Why did the 98 team win the title and the 97 team didn't? I was in the opening decade of my life in 98, so I only only vaguely remember what it was like to watch it on TV live. This also means I don't have a strong grasp on the differences in rosters between the two seasons, or the strength of the opponents those years. I know that Florida State played a backup QB, which may have made a difference, especially since Wienke was a great college players and Outzen threw a pick 6, which might have been the difference by the end of the game.
I went to whatifsports.com, which is a simulator, and I simulated the 97 team against the 98 team. I simulated the game five times, and the 97 team won all five games, and honestly it wasn't particularly close (screenshots attached). I know it's just a simulator, but...
So, enlighten me. What were the main differences between 97 and 98, and how was the 98 team able to do what the 97 team couldn't.
I lived it and remember it all. I was at 7 of them. I don’t have to look at scores. I would maintain that talent-wise, they were right there with 1999. They also went down to Gainesville and won in spite of being 17 point dogs. Barely beating a team doesn’t diminish anything, nor does that Georgia loss you refer to. It was still a very, very good team loaded with studs, and I was mainly referring to the talent level.UT lost at home to a Freshman QB and a 1st year head coach. The 2001 team roster-wise was solid except for LB and part of the OL and DB group. But they were lazy as hell at times. Go look at the scores that year.
Maybe I’m misreading your post, but are you saying that Al Wilson didn’t play against FSU in the Fiesta bowl? If so, that’s not correct, he absolutely played and was a beast all game. Both Dwayne Goodrich and Jeff Coleman were injured in the first half and missed the remainder of the game.No Lewis or Wilson for UT in that game. We had injuries too.