volinbham
VN GURU
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2004
- Messages
- 69,783
- Likes
- 62,437
Trust me, I am listening. I have had these debates with BPV and others multiple times. I see what they are peddling. It is just nice how there is an excuse for anything wrong that happened economically under Bush, and 60 days into the Obama presidency everything is his fault.
Here it is in a nutshell:
Bush had a positive effect on economic growth, anything bad was market driven outside of his control.
Obama has a negative effect. Anything good with the market is due to natural economic cycles.
How about this:
What Bush did right
1. Tax cuts in recession
What Bush did wrong
1. Excessive spending, large deficits
2. Not pushing hard enough for house finance reform
Bush economic score = C
What Obama has done right
1.
What Obama has done wrong
1. Support non-stimulative massive spending
2. Send mixed signals via Geithner
3. Talk down the economy
4. Signal massive spending via more government involvement in HC, Ed, Energy and Banking
Obama economic score = D-
Net? The economic cycle is fairly resilient. Bush gave it an appropriate short term kick with tax cuts but failed in other areas.
Obama has given nothing but economically hostile messages and programs. These work against the economic cycle - it will prevail despite his actions but he is certainly not helping.