I'm going off the actual bylaws and 247, as well as aking VQ themselves.
Also, the issue has already been decided - his release seemed to change nothing. Even if he actually released a signing spot or IC, they'd need to use it in the 2019 class. A released spot would apply to either the current class (2018, it happening 12/18) OR the following class (2019). It clearly seemed to change nothing and there's no way they can use something from December 2018 and use it for the 2020 class. So talking about it like it has impact on the 2020 class is just absurd.
As for the quote itself from VQ - I think they are somewhere between loose with words (IC vs Counter, which is what they likely meant) and just plain ignorant on the topic, from reading them since. The article seemed strange at the time, because the writer just said it in passing and it would seem to be a huge story, if true. Btw, this was not mentioned by ANY other outlet...again, strange. But I do remember he used the language of "initial counter", not just "counter", and he had nothing to say about the signing spot. So I tweeted him to get clarification. He never responded. I later read various VQ postings having to do with numbers and the staff consistently showed NO sense of understanding how they worked, one time basically telling a poster they were "too complicated" to explain.
It's sad to say, but I truly have no faith VQ understands the bylaws anyway...but Callahan has proven time and time again to understand them well enough to explain them to poster after poster. So, does he say we can take 26? No, he has said all we can take are 25.
Regardless of all this, we are at the 25 limit, if we are willing to use blueshirt(s).