superdave1984
Repeat Offender
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 8,688
- Likes
- 5,391
I don't understand why some people think it's a bad idea to have the SB in New Jersey. So what if it's cold. Football games are cold sometimes. The weather can affect any other game throughout the season or playoffs. Why not the SB???
Because if there is a blizzard up the east coast( which isn't that uncommon during that time of year) it could completely shut down the mass convergence into NYC for Super Bowl weekend which would be a PR and financial disaster for the biggest sporting event of the year. The key to a well oiled machine like the Super Bowl is to take out the variables, one being weather. The focus should be on the pageantry of the game, not the weather forecast.I don't understand why some people think it's a bad idea to have the SB in New Jersey. So what if it's cold. Football games are cold sometimes. The weather can affect any other game throughout the season or playoffs. Why not the SB???
. . . and it was 72 degrees inside the Georgia Dome.
Two ice storms struck the Atlanta area within a week of each other, the second one while the Super Bowl was being hosted. However, city and state crews kept streets and sidewalks free of ice, and MARTA public transport kept running. Despite this and being an indoor stadium, and the fact that the region does not receive any more ice storms than most other areas of the country, it was felt to affect the city's chances for hosting another Super Bowl, including the bid it lost for the 2009 Super Bowl.[38] That bid included meteorological data showing the rarity of such storms in the area.
I knew what he meant. My point is why jeopardize the game even further by playing it outdoors in New York? There was an ice storm in progress the last time the game was in Atlanta . . . yet it didn't impact the game whatsoever.He meant that the icy weather was so bad outside the dome, that it almost caused a postponement of the game
....that near disaster also pretty much made ATL no longer a viable super bowl site when the committees have met since
I knew what he meant. My point is why jeopardize the game even further by playing it outdoors in New York?
I think it'll work out pretty well. I wonder if they have the ability to kind of heat up the playing surface if there is precipitation...kind of like a seat warmer? Anyway, they should be able to after spending $1.6 billion.
gotcha
my guess is: New York's a big market; Goodell has shown he's a commish who's all about (mainly) trying to make the league a great deal more money (see his international stuff, i.e. "put a team in london" :/ ).
He's been pushing for a NY super bowl for a while now i think actually
I don't understand the need for a big market. The Super Bowl is and always will be the Super Bowl. If anything the casual fan of a team in the game will not go to tailgate and hang out around the stadium because the weather will be cold.