Other states would have to pass some kind of legislation enabling them to regulate who could and could not participate in private sports contests. They can't just decide they don't like UT or even just agree with the NCAA.Man, I hope you are correct, but please elaborate. If other states enforce a potential bowl ban, where would UT go - Bahama Bowl?
I feel UT will win the case and there will be no bowl ban, but what if?
But what I am saying is that the bowls themselves will enforce the NCAA ban by not extending the invitation. I don't believe the states would interfere with what the bowls do or don't do.Other states would have to pass some kind of legislation enabling them to regulate who could and could not participate in private sports contests. They can't just decide they don't like UT or even just agree with the NCAA.
There aren't really many direct links between the NCAA and state governments. They run into each other but they aren't connected.
I don't necessarily think they can directly. So the bowls would have to decide what is in their best interest. I personally do not see the NCAA as a very attractive ally right now.But what I am saying is that the bowls themselves will enforce the NCAA ban by not extending the invitation. I don't believe the states would interfere with what the bowls do or don't do.
Name one instance where that has ever occurred? It has not. Bowls and the cities they reside in are money hogs and UT is their bounty.But what I am saying is that the bowls themselves will enforce the NCAA ban by not extending the invitation. I don't believe the states would interfere with what the bowls do or don't do.
I cannot cite even one instance of where a school got a bowl ban and was offered a bowl bid anyway.Name one instance where that has ever occurred? It has not. Bowls and the cities they reside in are money hogs and UT is their bounty.