A ticket that would make Marx, Lenin and Stalin proud....

#29
#29
emainvol said:
where the heck will the other 15% or so go? Bloomberg won't run. Barr maybe gets a decent chunk and kills McCain?
Click to expand...

OrangeEmpire said:
It will happen................
Click to expand...

volsforever27 said:
If a 3rd party gets that many votes, all that will do is ensure an Obama win.
Click to expand...

Ron Paul, as he has brought Libertarianism to somewhat of a forefront, he'll take lots of Barr's %.

McCain will roll, because all of the left's whining about helping working families doesnt apply to working families, just ghetto trash, fat women with 14 kids, people who never took the time to speak proper english despite years of federally funded education, and others who are conent to suckle the governement sow.
 
#30
#30
Chemvol said:
Chuck Schumer never saw a camera he didn't feel he had to jump in front of.
Click to expand...
F Chuck "The 270 Winchester is a COP KILLER" Schumer. Who'd think a Jewish Senator would be the one who was all about the annihilation of Israel.
 
#32
#32
TennNC said:
Chuck Schumer has something to say about it too.

Is this what you think would happen, or is there an article that's predicting or imagining such a scenario?
Click to expand...
I think it is a possible scenario. I heard Carville discussing such a situation awhile back and the more I thought about it the more plausible it sounded. The other option I have heard, which would also put Bill in the Senate, is Hillary replacing Ruth Ginsburg. These people could take this to the convention and Obama knows it. Another Rev. Wright popping up at the wrong time could make Hillary the nominee. It's time to make the pay off.
 
#33
#33
VolunteerHillbilly said:
I think it is a possible scenario. I heard Carville discussing such a situation awhile back and the more I thought about it the more plausible it sounded. The other option I have heard, which would also put Bill in the Senate, is Hillary replacing Ruth Ginsburg. These people could take this to the convention and Obama knows it. Another Rev. Wright popping up at the wrong time could make Hillary the nominee. It's time to make the pay off.
Click to expand...

A Clinton on the Supreme Court would hasten my idealology that the working man needs to arm and prepare for the next Lexington Green
 
#34
#34
JTrainDavis said:
Ron Paul, as he has brought Libertarianism to somewhat of a forefront, he'll take lots of Barr's %.

McCain will roll, because all of the left's whining about helping working families doesnt apply to working families, just ghetto trash, fat women with 14 kids, people who never took the time to speak proper english despite years of federally funded education, and others who are conent to suckle the governement sow.
Click to expand...

JTrainDavis said:
F Chuck "The 270 Winchester is a COP KILLER" Schumer. Who'd think a Jewish Senator would be the one who was all about the annihilation of Israel.
Click to expand...

Don't sugar-coat it. Tell us what you really think. :)
 
#35
#35
VolunteerHillbilly said:
I think it is a possible scenario. I heard Carville discussing such a situation awhile back and the more I thought about it the more plausible it sounded. The other option I have heard, which would also put Bill in the Senate, is Hillary replacing Ruth Ginsburg. These people could take this to the convention and Obama knows it. Another Rev. Wright popping up at the wrong time could make Hillary the nominee. It's time to make the pay off.
Click to expand...
as abominable as HRC on the Supreme Court sounds, her replacing RBG would actually shift the court to the right a bit.
 
#36
#36
TennNC said:
How do you figure that? If Hillary wanted it, she'd be about 3rd or 4th in line. I know he's an ex-president, but the guys ahead of him (including the current majority leader) won't relinquish their spot, especially with a potential filibuster-proof majority. at least I don't think they would.

Senator Bill would be interesting though. I reckon he might have an axe to grind with some folks.
Click to expand...
you know, with the legendary Clintonite offing of those in the way, ie Vince Foster, Hillary's new overtures at the VP office take on a whole new light.
 
#38
#38
Wouldn't bringing Hillary back to the White House defeat the foundation of Obama's campaign? So much for "Change We Can Believe In."
 
#39
#39
Jaytrain5 said:
Wouldn't bringing Hillary back to the White House defeat the foundation of Obama's campaign? So much for "Change We Can Believe In."
Click to expand...

Did he name her his running mate? I haven't heard that announcement. So much for waiting for decisions to actually happen before we make conclusions.
 
#40
#40
JTrainDavis said:
Ron Paul, as he has brought Libertarianism to somewhat of a forefront, he'll take lots of Barr's %.

McCain will roll, because all of the left's whining about helping working families doesnt apply to working families, just ghetto trash, fat women with 14 kids, people who never took the time to speak proper english despite years of federally funded education, and others who are conent to suckle the governement sow.
Click to expand...

Or possibly also the 60% of college grads who have been voting for him during the primary season. My guess is that they can speak proper English and probably know how to spell "content" as well. But it's not as easy to rip on them, so let's just stick with "ghetto trash." Lovely.
 
#41
#41
TennNC said:
Or possibly also the 60% of college grads who have been voting for him during the primary season. My guess is that they can speak proper English and probably know how to spell "content" as well. But it's not as easy to rip on them, so let's just stick with "ghetto trash." Lovely.
Click to expand...
I'm assuming that the 60% is some sort of liberal trash number. What does it mean?
 
#43
#43
TennNC said:
From this liberal trash organization:

Obama Dominates Clinton Among College Graduates

Btw, how about I save you some typing on future posts and just assume that whenever you type "liberal" it is followed by some derogatory term.
Click to expand...

I meant that the number was trash, which is why the word trash was placed in front of the word number. The number, as presented, was garbage and you know it.
 
#44
#44
VolDad said:
Don't sugar-coat it. Tell us what you really think. :)
Click to expand...

JTrainDavis said:
Ron Paul, as he has brought Libertarianism to somewhat of a forefront, he'll take lots of Barr's %.

McCain will roll, because all of the left's whining about helping working families doesnt apply to working families, just ghetto trash, fat women with 14 kids, people who never took the time to speak proper english despite years of federally funded education, and others who are conent to suckle the governement sow.
Click to expand...


Like I posted a few weeks ago. This election will bring out the best.......AND WORST, in people.
 
#45
#45
BigPapaVol said:
I meant that the number was trash, which is why the word trash was placed in front of the word number. The number, as presented, was garbage and you know it.
Click to expand...

Then why include the word "liberal"? What does liberal have to do with it?

And why would I "know" it's garbage? It's based on actual research gathered by one of the most respectable research companies that showed 60% of college grads who voted in the Dem. primaries (which have seen record turnouts, btw) voted for Sen. Obama.

Also, I'll save you some more typing and assume that any response you make to one of my posts tags it as "liberal" (with derogatory comment assumed as well, of course).
 
#46
#46
TennNC said:
Then why include the word "liberal"? What does liberal have to do with it?

And why would I "know" it's garbage? It's based on actual research gathered by one of the most respectable research companies that showed 60% of college grads who voted in the Dem. primaries (which have seen record turnouts, btw) voted for Sen. Obama.

Also, I'll save you some more typing and assume that any response you make to one of my posts tags it as "liberal" (with derogatory comment assumed as well, of course).
Click to expand...

you didn't say 60% of dem primary voting college grads, who are decidedly liberal. You left out the Repub primary voters, who are overwhelmingly college grads. The liberal comment came from the clearly liberal viewpoint from which the original statement was made.

Finally, respectable and polling company have no business in the same discussion.
 
#47
#47
TennNC said:
Or possibly also the 60% of college grads who have been voting for him during the primary season. My guess is that they can speak proper English and probably know how to spell "content" as well. But it's not as easy to rip on them, so let's just stick with "ghetto trash." Lovely.
Click to expand...
I know many folks in Williamson County who voted for him in the primary because they do not believe he is electable in a general election, and they have extreme dislike for Hillary. Most of them are what I would consider the Republican version of a Yellow Dog Democrat.
 
#48
#48
TennNC said:
Then why include the word "liberal"? What does liberal have to do with it?

And why would I "know" it's garbage? It's based on actual research gathered by one of the most respectable research companies that showed 60% of college grads who voted in the Dem. primaries (which have seen record turnouts, btw) voted for Sen. Obama.

Also, I'll save you some more typing and assume that any response you make to one of my posts tags it as "liberal" (with derogatory comment assumed as well, of course).
Click to expand...

The only thing that proves is that 40% of college grads are actually intelligent.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top