Abortions Rights Win (Again)

#602
#602
hog88 said:
As it should have been from the beginning.
Click to expand...
Needs to be constitutionally protected. It is a right to privacy, we had it right the first time. There is a health crisis happening in red states. But they have no one to blame but themselves.
 
#603
#603
Jackcrevol said:
Needs to be constitutionally protected. It is a right to privacy, we had it right the first time. There is a health crisis happening in red states. But they have no one to blame but themselves.
Click to expand...

If abortion is a right to privacy issue then so is every other medical procedure and drug. It has not a damn thing to do with privacy and there is no need for a constitutional amendment protecting a medical procedure. States have always had the power to regulate the healthcare providers within their jurisdiction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 85SugarVol, NurseGoodVol and AM64
#604
#604
hog88 said:
If abortion is a right to privacy issue then so is every other medical procedure and drug. It has not a damn thing to do with privacy and there is no need for a constitutional amendment protecting a medical procedure. States have always had the power to regulate the healthcare providers within their jurisdiction.
Click to expand...
Ok. Gun ownership isnt a privacy issue either. Therefore doesnt warrant constitutional protection.

Its the right to choose what to do with one's body. Enforcing this as a 'all or nothing' will, just as it is. Force medical procedures to happen illegally, force women to lose their lives, or become gravely ill, or force the system to raise children who are mentally, physically, or incapable of helping themselves. Something which it isnt designed to do.

Its my hope that the over 50% of the population, of whom arent accurately represented by their Representatives, who are pro-choice will take that anger, resentment, and vitriol to the polls.

We saw it in Virginia two weeks ago. I think people are fed up with the 1%ers making decisions on their behalf, which doesnt align with their beliefs.
 
#606
#606
Jackcrevol said:
Ok. Gun ownership isnt a privacy issue either. Therefore doesnt warrant constitutional protection.

Its the right to choose what to do with one's body. Enforcing this as a 'all or nothing' will, just as it is. Force medical procedures to happen illegally, force women to lose their lives, or become gravely ill, or force the system to raise children who are mentally, physically, or incapable of helping themselves. Something which it isnt designed to do.

Its my hope that the over 50% of the population, of whom arent accurately represented by their Representatives, who are pro-choice will take that anger, resentment, and vitriol to the polls.

We saw it in Virginia two weeks ago. I think people are fed up with the 1%ers making decisions on their behalf, which doesnt align with their beliefs.
Click to expand...

But gun ownership has never been argued as a privacy right and from the jump was a constitutionally protected right.

Hey, just like with the second amendment, if you think the constitution needs amending to make abortion a protected right get to work on the amendment process. I can respect going that route the same as I would respect an effort by the gun grabbers if they went about it the right way.

As to your last point, it's apparent that people are not fed up with 1%ers making decisions on the behalf because they keep electing the same 1%ers every cycle whether they be R or D.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matt2496, C-south, Orangeslice13 and 2 others
#608
#608
hog88 said:
But gun ownership has never been argued as a privacy right and from the jump was a constitutionally protected right.

Hey, just like with the second amendment, if you think the constitution needs amending to make abortion a protected right get to work on the amendment process. I can respect going that route the same as I would respect an effort by the gun grabbers if they went about it the right way.

As to your last point, it's apparent that people are not fed up with 1%ers making decisions on the behalf because they keep electing the same 1%ers every cycle whether they be R or D.
Click to expand...
37 states can change it.
 
#609
#609
Jackcrevol said:
Ok. Gun ownership isnt a privacy issue either. Therefore doesnt warrant constitutional protection.
Click to expand...
Oh my.

This might be one of the worst takes you ever took the time to type out and hit send on.

Of course gun ownership isn’t a privacy issue - it’s never been argued as such. For obvious (at least should be obvious) reasons….

Right to bear arms is actually enshrined in the Bill of Rights in the Constitution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, CagleMtnVol, Orangeslice13 and 6 others
#610
#610
85SugarVol said:
Oh my.

This might be one of the worst takes you ever took the time to type out and hit send on.

Of course gun ownership isn’t a privacy issue - it’s never been argued as such. For obvious (at least should be obvious) reasons….

Right to bear arms is actually enshrined in the Bill of Rights in the Constitution.
Click to expand...
Reaally, bad takes in the abortion section of the PF? I'm shocked.
 
#614
#614
Jackcrevol said:
Needs to be constitutionally protected. It is a right to privacy, we had it right the first time. There is a health crisis happening in red states. But they have no one to blame but themselves.
Click to expand...

Having irresponsible , unprotected sex isn’t a health crisis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: just bob
#615
#615
Jackcrevol said:
Ok. Gun ownership isnt a privacy issue either. Therefore doesnt warrant constitutional protection.

Its the right to choose what to do with one's body. Enforcing this as a 'all or nothing' will, just as it is. Force medical procedures to happen illegally, force women to lose their lives, or become gravely ill, or force the system to raise children who are mentally, physically, or incapable of helping themselves. Something which it isnt designed to do.

Its my hope that the over 50% of the population, of whom arent accurately represented by their Representatives, who are pro-choice will take that anger, resentment, and vitriol to the polls.

We saw it in Virginia two weeks ago. I think people are fed up with the 1%ers making decisions on their behalf, which doesnt align with their beliefs.
Click to expand...

Literally one of the dumbest arguments ever presented.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lookoutmtn17
#616
#616
hndog609 said:
You know your argument makes no sense when you try to say something doesn't have Constitutional protection when it's literally explicitly cited as an amendment in the BOR.
Click to expand...
Yep, the public school education system failed him.
 
#619
#619
85SugarVol said:
So you actually believe gun ownership is a privacy rights issue? Explain.
Click to expand...
I think it was just a very, very poorly thought out "Yeah, well what about..." take. Never should have even been proffered and he should try to memory hole ASAP.
 
#621
#621
Jackcrevol said:
Needs to be constitutionally protected. It is a right to privacy, we had it right the first time. There is a health crisis happening in red states. But they have no one to blame but themselves.
Click to expand...

See this post as an example of what I’m talking about in my post above this
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top