ACLU pardners with moslem organization to promote islamic sharia law in America.

#1

gsvol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
14,179
Likes
11
#1
Pundit Press: Muslim Public Affairs Council, ACLU Launch Convention to Rid US of Anti-Sharia Laws

The Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) has declared
a "Capital Hill forum" to discuss Sharia Law, and how
Americans can slow and turn back the progress of
Anti-Sharia laws and sentiment.

“Sharia has become an inflammatory buzzword that is
getting thrown about and used to craft pre-emptive
legislation with little to no understanding of what it is
and isn’t,” said Director of MPAC's Washington, DC,
Office Haris Tarin. “In the face of a wave of anti-sharia
bills cropping up all over the country, it’s time for a
level-headed adult conversation on the issue.”

The point of the convention, in which four "experts"
will speak on the "impact of anti-sharia bill," is to
supposedly inform ignorant people of what Muslim
law actually is.

"The topic of Islamic jurisprudence in the United States
is now becoming a source of heated – and confused –
debate," writes MPAC's launch article.

The forum is to take place at the Rayburn House Office
Building in Washington, DC. The experts participating
are Noha A. Bakr, Daniel Mach, who is the Director of
the ACLU’s Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief,
"Executive Director" Gerry Serotta, and moderator Haris
Tarin.

Let’s look at some of the most influential cases
the ACLU presented to the Supreme Court of the
United States, and how they would have been
dealt with in a Sharia law court.

1) Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, in which the
ACLU backed New Jersey’s efforts to force the
BSA to admit a homosexual scout leader. The
ACLU lost. In Sharia law, the homosexual who
wanted to be a scout leader would be sentenced
to death.

2) Ferguson v. City of Charleston, the ACLU won
the case preventing the city from drug testing
pregnant women, and referring those with drugs
in their system to the police, to protect their
children. In Sharia law, women are chattel, so
the government can do as it wishes to them.
If they are unmarried and pregnant, they have
committed adultery, so are subject to the death
penalty.

3) Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe.
An ACLU win, that permitting student-led and
student-initiated prayer on state run school
ground at football games violates the Establishment
Clause. In Sharia law, prayer for Muslims is mandatory,
and Christians praying in public is “proselytization”,
a serious criminal offense that in some Muslim nations
has a penalty of death.

The experts participating are Noha A. Bakr, Daniel
Mach, who is the Director of the ACLU’s Program on
Freedom of Religion and Belief....

Agenda: the acceptance and institution of the following:

Requirement of women to obtain permission from
husbands for daily freedoms;

Beating of disobedient woman and girls;

Execution of homosexuals;

Engagement of polygamy and forced child marriages;

Requirement of the testimony of four male witnesses to prove rape;

Stoning of adulteresses;

Lashing of adulterers;

Amputation of body for criminal offenses;

Female genital mutilation;

Capital punishment for those who slander or insult
Islam;

Execution of apostates, or those that leave the religion of Islam;

Inferior status for all non-Muslims, known as Dhimmitude.

Concept of Taquiyya: A Muslim may lie or deceive
others to advance the cause of Islam.

The above list from:

Tenets of Shariah Law
 
#2
#2
You have so much hate bro. Let it go. Do you actually really believe, in any way that sharia law will have any impact or influence in the US? Really? You fear the nothing.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#6
#6
You have so much hate bro. Let it go. Do you actually really believe, in any way that sharia law will have any impact or influence in the US? Really? You fear the nothing.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

If Sharia Law is ligitimized in any way by our Government or a Civil Rights Group, then it is already an influence. Ask Europeans how slippery the slope is once the seed of Sharia Law is planted.
 
#7
#7
There is a segment of the American political continuum that thrives on fanning the flames of hate against Muslims and people from the Middle East (or almost any foreign country, for that matter). Seems to me that a seminar on the subject should be welcome because, if you are really that distrusting, you can use what is said there to support your argument.


Unless, of course, you are more afraid that what would be said would not support your argument.
 
#8
#8
:good!:
If Sharia Law is ligitimized in any way by our Government or a Civil Rights Group, then it is already an influence. Ask Europeans how slippery the slope is once the seed of Sharia Law is planted.

:good!::clapping:
 
#9
#9
There is a segment of the American political continuum that thrives on fanning the flames of hate against Muslims and people from the Middle East (or almost any foreign country, for that matter). Seems to me that a seminar on the subject should be welcome because, if you are really that distrusting, you can use what is said there to support your argument.


Unless, of course, you are more afraid that what would be said would not support your argument.

This is my favorite fear. Islam is taking over! Sharia is coming! I will have to throw rocks at my cheating wife! They are taking over! The british are coming! Hitler is here!
 
#10
#10
You have so much hate bro. Let it go. Do you actually really believe, in any way that sharia law will have any impact or influence in the US? Really? You fear the nothing.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

You have so much silliness and ignorance lil bro.

Give it up indeed.

Sharia law has already been cited in numerous American court cases and the moslems are frequently being appeased.

Why give up such hard won freedoms so easily??

Answer me that bopeepus!
 
#11
#11
You have so much silliness and ignorance lil bro.

Give it up indeed.

Sharia law has already been cited in numerous American court cases and the moslems are frequently being appeased.

Why give up such hard won freedoms so easily??

Answer me that bopeepus!

Do you honestly think the United States of America will be adopting Sharia Law? This has to be a troll attempt.
 
#12
#12
You have so much silliness and ignorance lil bro.

Give it up indeed.

Sharia law has already been cited in numerous American court cases and the moslems are frequently being appeased.

Why give up such hard won freedoms so easily??

Answer me that bopeepus!

and the rulings will be overturned if they are against US law. A few rulings by stupid judges does not mean we're rewriting the Constitution
 
#13
#13
and the rulings will be overturned if they are against US law. A few rulings by stupid judges does not mean we're rewriting the Constitution

Exactly. Do people love to be afraid? There's no way, and I don't care whos in office, that we, as a country, would allow Sharia Law to become a staple in our society. It's laughable to believe otherwise.
 
#14
#14
Exactly. Do people love to be afraid? There's no way, and I don't care whos in office, that we, as a country, would allow Sharia Law to become a staple in our society. It's laughable to believe otherwise.

By giving these nut jobs a forum to discuss their ridiculous "law" on Capitol Hill, Washington is legitimizing their discussion. I'm not saying we should all be terrified of a hostile Moslem takover, but by giving them a chance to "hear them out", we open the door to people being influenced to tolerate their way of life.
 
#15
#15
By giving these nut jobs a forum to discuss their ridiculous "law" on Capitol Hill, Washington is legitimizing their discussion. I'm not saying we should all be terrified of a hostile Moslem takover, but by giving them a chance to "hear them out", we open the door to people being influenced to tolerate their way of life.

it's no more ridiculous than any other religious law.

And call me crazy but I thought the US was a tolerant country where differing views were welcome
 
#17
#17
it's no more ridiculous than any other religious law.

And call me crazy but I thought the US was a tolerant country where differing views were welcome

I was about to say the same thing. What's wrong with tolerance?

Ultraconservatives thrive on fearmongering. It's why the Patriot Act exists and the TSA is allowed to continue pissing on the rights of the citizens. This thread is nothing more than another example.
 
#18
#18
it's no more ridiculous than any other religious law.

And call me crazy but I thought the US was a tolerant country where differing views were welcome

Differing views are welcome. Sharia Law is not a "differing view", it is one religion's justification for murdering and mutilating innocent people. It is not a discussion worth listening to, so why allow them their own forum to try to explain their "views"?
 
#19
#19
Differing views are welcome. Sharia Law is not a "differing view", it is one religion's justification for murdering and mutilating innocent people. It is not a discussion worth listening to, so why allow them their own forum to try to explain their "views"?

Because what you're getting into now is stifling a religion, which is expressly forbidden in the Constitution.

And why are you the one to decide what is and is not worth listening to?
 
#20
#20
I was about to say the same thing. What's wrong with tolerance?

Ultraconservatives thrive on fearmongering. It's why the Patriot Act exists and the TSA is allowed to continue pissing on the rights of the citizens. This thread is nothing more than another example.

There is a difference between being aware and being afraid.
 
#22
#22
Differing views are welcome. Sharia Law is not a "differing view", it is one religion's justification for murdering and mutilating innocent people. It is not a discussion worth listening to, so why allow them their own forum to try to explain their "views"?

So are you ok with all religions being silenced or just the ones you disagree with? I'm on board with an all or nothing approach here

Also, Sharia encompasses a whole lot more than just the couple of parts you choose to pick out
 
#23
#23
Because what you're getting into now is stifling a religion, which is expressly forbidden in the Constitution.

And why are you the one to decide what is and is not worth listening to?

Failing to facilitate a "Religion's" delivery of their message is not the same as stifling it. How many Christian organizations would be afforded the same forum to discuss their religious beliefs that the Sharia Law is getting?
 
#24
#24
Failing to facilitate a "Religion's" delivery of their message is not the same as stifling it. How many Christian organizations would be afforded the same forum to discuss their religious beliefs that the Sharia Law is getting?

pretty sure there are numerous examples of the ACLU backing Christian groups
 

VN Store



Back
Top