Originally posted by Orangewhiteblood@Jul 17, 2005 10:52 PM
You mean like it was in real life? I guess that if you're going to do a movie about it, it might as well show what happened.
I agree that people shouldn't profit off of it, but tell that to the people who were selling the flags, the special coins etc.....
[snapback]115351[/snapback]
Originally posted by GAVol@Jul 17, 2005 10:55 PM
No I think what he means is that Oliver Stone has a history of revisionist filmmaking. Nothing he touches is without some kind of cooky conspiracy theory.
[snapback]115358[/snapback]
Originally posted by Orangewhiteblood@Jul 17, 2005 10:56 PM
Okay, gotcha.... :thumbsup: I like the conspiracy theories though... h34r:
[snapback]115360[/snapback]
Originally posted by GAVol@Jul 17, 2005 11:00 PM
That stuff is fine as long as you know that's what you're getting. I think Stone takes himself a little too seriously.
You know that if Stone does it, he will document what happened and somehow there will be a back story about some American businessmen that orchestrated the attack in order to drive up the price of oil. :shakehead:
[snapback]115364[/snapback]
Originally posted by LadyinOrange@Jul 17, 2005 7:54 PM
milo, a documentary would serve just as well, wouldn't it?
Not trying to start anything, I swear. But preserving it for for future generations does not require a star-studded cast and a million dollar budget.
Just my two cents, though.
[snapback]115357[/snapback]