Ah yes, the religion of peace.

#51
#51
Small world, one of my guys is from Mauritania which is just south of Morocco.

What does your Mauritanian trooper have to say about the Haratine??

The English are slowly being ethnically cleansed out of their own country. Any other view point is a lie.

I have a couple of friends who are professionals and most years they spend their vacation in some third world country helping out poor people without pay.

A few years ago they decided to take a real vacation and went to England to visit friends. They said the elderly of London are virtual prisoners in their homes after dark, afraid to even go out for a walk for fear of strong arm robbery.

I'm not even going to bother responding to the first part.

You didn't respond to any part of my earlier post to you about the no-go zones.

Waddup widdat??
 
#52
#52
How about get a clue!

Great advice to the clueless one, wish I had said that.

:hi:

:eek:k:

Those who believe that Muslims are more predisposed to be terrorists, simply by virtue of being Muslim, are doomed to suffer for their pitifiul ignorance of the realities of the moedern world. --

Book of Lawgator, Ch. 1, Sec.2

:lolabove:

Talk about 'doomed to suffer for their pitiful ignorance'? Talk about the author of 'Book of Lawgator!'

Book it, study the history of terrorism since WWII and you will find that followers of islam have committed or were involved with about 99.44% of all terrorist events.

Not to mention 'pitifiul' and 'moedern,' which leads me to ask, what is the name of your native planet??
 
#53
#53
:lolabove:

Talk about 'doomed to suffer for their pitiful ignorance'? Talk about the author of 'Book of Lawgator!'

Book it, study the history of terrorism since WWII and you will find that followers of islam have committed or were involved with about 99.44% of all terrorist events.

Not to mention 'pitifiul' and 'moedern,' which leads me to ask, what is the name of your native planet??

I would love to know how you came up with that number.
 
#54
#54
You didn't respond to any part of my earlier post to you about the no-go zones.

Waddup widdat??

you also ignored mine where I said the same places exist in the US just along different lines.
 
#55
#55
What does your Mauritanian trooper have to say about the Haratine??



I have a couple of friends who are professionals and most years they spend their vacation in some third world country helping out poor people without pay.

A few years ago they decided to take a real vacation and went to England to visit friends. They said the elderly of London are virtual prisoners in their homes after dark, afraid to even go out for a walk for fear of strong arm robbery.



You didn't respond to any part of my earlier post to you about the no-go zones.

Waddup widdat??

There are parts of London that are horrible, and I probably wouldnt want to go out after dark. Tottenham, Hackney, Peckham...all nasty places that I wouldnt walk around after dark. Thats the same with many major cities. To say that 'the elderly of London are prisoners in their own homes' means one of two things, either you are lying (which I wouldnt be surprised to hear) or your friends misheard of grossly exagerated. Aside from that, I dont quite know what that has to do with the discussion we are currently having. Make of this what you will, I lived the first 25 years of my life in an area of London that has a reputation for being unsafe, whereas you are reeling out an anecdote from friends of friends. Have you ever actually been to the UK or Europe? I think you should stick to copying and pasting articles from right wing blogs.

I dont really know how to respond to your poing about 'no go' areas. I have never known anything like that, aside from areas which I wouldnt go to because of general crime. I'm sure there are areas in Knoxville that are like that. Maybe you get so called 'no go' areas in cities like Bradford where there is a fair bit of racial tension, but I've never been there or have heard of such things. Even someone as blinkered as you would have to admit that its hard to respond to a point where the poster is simply making stuff up. You need to form a coherent point if you want me to respond to it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
#57
#57
What does your Mauritanian trooper have to say about the Haratine??



I have a couple of friends who are professionals and most years they spend their vacation in some third world country helping out poor people without pay.

A few years ago they decided to take a real vacation and went to England to visit friends. They said the elderly of London are virtual prisoners in their homes after dark, afraid to even go out for a walk for fear of strong arm robbery.



You didn't respond to any part of my earlier post to you about the no-go zones.

Waddup widdat??


The best we can come up with is that he is French Special forces and his job in the states is a side job.

He will randomly come up and tell me that he needs a month off and it is fairly strange that government changes hands in Mauritania.
 
#58
#58
Alot of people are really blind when it comes to recognizing just what Islam is. Did they never even notice when they would show the terrorist training videos where they showed them doing house to house combat, when they went in, the targets where a Star of David and the Christian Cross??? Its becoming "open season" on Christians here too!!

A point well made, infiltrate, prosletize and train.

This means that there is evidence of paramilitary training in at least four compounds in four states, and many more sites exist throughout the country.

According to a 2006 report by the Regional Organized Crime Information Center funded with a Justice Department grant given to CAN, “Today, Jamaat ul-Fuqra has more than 35 suspected communes and more than 3,000 members across the United States, all in support of one goal: the purification of Islam through violence.”

And that is one of several such groups.

Funny%20Notice%20-%20Dumb%20People.jpg


I would love to know how you came up with that number.

Latest Offerings from the Religion of Peace

I've defended that statement here before and produced quite a bit of information supporting it.

Someone that really opened my eyes about Islamic extremism, prior even to 9/11, was a very intelligent young man I've known since his childhood who visited me while back.

It was a chilly spring day and I asked why he didn't have a jacket and he remarked that it seemed rather warm to him, when he had boarded a plane the previous day the temperature had been 10 degrees. I asked where that was and he said Minsk, Russia. Later on he left government service after breaking an Associated (propaganda) Press photographer's jaw in Vietnam, after which he went back to continue his education.

One day he answered a knock at the door and it was the FBI inquiring about his internet activity. He had been visiting a lot of Islamic sites that promote violent jihad, many with videos of muslim radicals beheading Christian missionaries and other such inflamitory pieces.

He informed the FBI he was writing a thesis for a class he was taking at a University and gave them the number of his professor and produced some of the work he had been compiling. They said OK, they just wanted to know why he had been engaged in that activity.

He then went on to tell me lots and lots of facts that you just won't get from news sources. Ninety per cent is actually an understatement.

You can easily do a minimal of research and come up with the same statistic.


you also ignored mine where I said the same places exist in the US just along different lines.

I didn't know you adressed that to me but I definately agree, the same thing is happening in America and we should immediately address that problem, imo.

There are parts of London that are horrible, and I probably wouldnt want to go out after dark. Tottenham, Hackney, Peckham...all nasty places that I wouldnt walk around after dark. Thats the same with many major cities. To say that 'the elderly of London are prisoners in their own homes' means one of two things, either you are lying (which I wouldnt be surprised to hear) or your friends misheard of grossly exagerated. Aside from that, I dont quite know what that has to do with the discussion we are currently having. Make of this what you will, I lived the first 25 years of my life in an area of London that has a reputation for being unsafe, whereas you are reeling out an anecdote from friends of friends. Have you ever actually been to the UK or Europe? I think you should stick to copying and pasting articles from right wing blogs..

FYI, Yes I have visited the UK and lived in Europe for about a year and a half.

When have you been out of your dreary little villiage in the past twenty years??

You are wrong about your two possible scenarios, they weren't lying and they weren't grossly exagerating.

I think you should stick to DU or some other such inane leftist message board. :)


I dont really know how to respond to your poing about 'no go' areas. I have never known anything like that, aside from areas which I wouldnt go to because of general crime. I'm sure there are areas in Knoxville that are like that. Maybe you get so called 'no go' areas in cities like Bradford where there is a fair bit of racial tension, but I've never been there or have heard of such things. Even someone as blinkered as you would have to admit that its hard to respond to a point where the poster is simply making stuff up. You need to form a coherent point if you want me to respond to it.

No-go Muslim areas in the UK for Kuffars.

He added that Government confusion "risks encouraging radicalism and creating home-grown terrorism".

It's just not the UK, in other European countries the problem is far worse.

In February this year, (2008) Christian evangelists Arthur Cunningham and Joseph Abraham were doing what Christian evangelists do: handing out Bible extracts. They were stopped by a representative of the law, threatened with arrest if they carried on preaching in “a Muslim area,” and warned that they might get beaten up if they came back.

Where did this incident take place? Saudi Arabia, Iran, or Pakistan, where Christian preaching is forbidden and apostates persecuted? No, this “Muslim area” was in Alum Rock, Birmingham, England.

That’s right — England, cradle of free speech; England, a country with an established, if enfeebled, Church, and where seventy-five percent of citizens (at the 2001 census) describe themselves as Christian. The man who stopped the evangelists, calling their preaching a “hate crime,” was Naeem Naguthney, a police community support officer (PCSO), and a Muslim.

This is not the first time an English “Muslim area” has hit the news. In 2006, Muslim preacher Abu Izzadeen expressed outrage that then-Home Secretary John Reid was visiting “a Muslim area”: East London.

Yet when the bishop of Rochester recently warned that Britain was developing Muslim no-go areas, he was denounced by Muslims as — what else? — Islamophobic.

The choice of words — “Muslim area” — is significant. Non-Muslims are not merely told that their behavior might upset or anger Muslims, but that they themselves are on Muslim soil, where such behavior is forbidden.

Each niqab allowed in the workplace, each new mosque, each “hate-speech law” is, as London’s new Mayor Boris Johnson put it, “another yard of territory in the kulturkampf of modern Britain.”

Alum Rock has, in accordance with the tenets of jihad, been claimed for the Dar al-Islam. And once Islam has claimed an area, that area cannot be taken back without a fight.

Such craven appeasement of Muslims is not unprecedented: it was the West Midlands Police force which tried to prosecute Channel 4, whose excellent TV documentary Undercover Mosque revealed the open sedition and hatred of the West preached in our mosques.

The best we can come up with is that he is French Special forces and his job in the states is a side job.

He will randomly come up and tell me that he needs a month off and it is fairly strange that government changes hands in Mauritania.

Then you have nothing to worry about, 'French' and 'intelligence' should never be used in the same sentence. :p
 
#59
#59
Trying to lump all Muslims in with the terrorist types is nonsensical to me. Almost all religious movements have an element of assimilate or eradicate the nonbelievers. Some sects simply go overboard and we don't have to be accepting of them and, in fact, we aren't. Our counterterrorism policies are aimed squarely at these groups, including our very own, lily white American nut jobs who blow up buildings in OK City.

Terry Nichols learned his bomb making skills from muslim terrorists in the Philipines and had hundreds of phone calls to them just prior to the OKC bombing.

Middle easterners (most likely Iraqi intelligence) aided and abetted right up until the moment of the bombing.

What can you say for our immigration policies that allow some to come here to America to preach thei jihadist terror tactics domestically??

Even the head of the CIA testified before congress that this wasn't the work of lily white nutjobs.

Where do you get you intelligence input, nonsensical daily??? :crazy:
 
#60
#60
I wasn't speaking to you. The OP was clearly generalizing about Muslims, which I find absurd.

Anytime you think 'absurd' you should be squarly facing you bathroom mirror!

The OP clearly adressed islam and not individual muslims for instance.

Clearly individual muslims subscribe to the teachings of islam.

Duh!!!!
 
#61
#61
So....then the rest of us need to become anti-Muslim? Is that the point?

They will take over because they're required to, hence we need to limit their spread? How would that be any different than the extremists?

You seem to have a pointless point.

How would that be different from what extremeist??

Methinks you are in the market for a dhimmi prayer rug.
 
#63
#63
but to what end the vigilance?

file:///C:/WINDOWS/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.IE5/S1INCXUJ/polar-bear-face-palm_thumbnail1%5B1%5D.jpg

Let's see.....in answer to your question:

To protect and defend our way of life, our freedoms and legal protections and to prevent being placed under a tyrannical opression both collectively and individually and to not only honor those of our ancestors who have fought and sometimes died to pass along those hard won freedoms to us but for us to protect, defend and pass on those same freedoms and liberty to our children and their children???

Would you ask to what end the vigilence if you were dealing with the nazi party???


Folks, it is time we try and make better decisions as Americans on how to survive!!! Multiculturism is nice to a point as long as we don’t deny our Christian heritage, culture, main language and solid rock of our legal system!!!

LiveLeak-dot-com-7b23f0bb3ce0-jesusforsharia21.jpg


Top ten reasons why sharia is bad for ALL societies.

Jihad for sharia in America in just this past year.


What little Johnny needs to learn about islam.

In the past, American textbooks were prone to two great pitfalls: Either they dealt with Islam superficially or they presented it in the manner preferred and promoted by well-funded defenders of Islamic extremism. A hallmark of that latter view is an emphasis on the unity of Islam, which is portrayed as simple, monolithic, and benign.

islam_is_not_a_religion_of_peace_postcard-p239745382912284363qibm_400.jpg


and never has been at any time in history from the day it's illiterate murdurous founder made his first convert fourteen hundred years ago.

BTW many of his first converts were his own slaves who had no choice just as any child born into a muslim family today is threatened with death under sharia if he (or she) renounces islam.
 
Last edited:

VN Store



Back
Top