...Which is another problem. Despite spurts of defensive intensity, we have been plagued over the past few years by an inability to closely guard the hot shooter(s) [see: Jodie Meeks].
You're probably right. I would think most teams will be in "tourny shape" come March. Most are not ready to go to the big dance in Nov.
OK. I just expected to see some serious progress on O this year. I doubt that I am alone with my frustration.
Again, I LOVE what CBP has brought to the program. But, at what point does it become painfully obvious that we are clueless when we have to slow down and play offense?
Last year through 6 games vs. this year through 6 games.
Both teams 5-1.
2008 Vols get beat pretty bad by Gonzaga in the finals. This year Vols had a chance to beat #6 Purdue in the tourney finals.
2008 through 6 games FG% vs 2009
49.6% vs. 50.5%
FT% 70.4% vs. 74.2%
3PT% 37% vs. 45.5%
PPG 87.17 vs 88.2
Ast. 18.5 vs 19.8
We are scoring more at a better percentage, shooting the 3 considerable better, and FT% has improved.
Man you are so right, we can't even control tempo against lesser competition. If a team wants to run slow against us they have a 90% chance of doing it sadly. Getting a little sick of it myself.
All of which are good news. Scotty (esp. from deep) has helped those stats, for sure. That's one positive I see thus far.
I also think our press defense looks better, but we really haven't faced very good competition, with the exception of Purdue.
Again, I'm far from a "nega-Vol." I just think that we need some real improvement from set offensive plays to evolve into a tourney threat.
I guess it was easier to just not watch them and care when they were 1-5 vs. 5-1. Being in the top 10 also sucks. I wish we could just drop a few games and get out of that stupid poll thing.
Don't go off the deep end. I am certainly not.
My question is this: At what point do we demand more consistency on offense when we are forced to slow down and take advantage of our mismatches?
If I say that this was one of the worst half-court offensive games I have seen from the Vols? We let a severely undermatched team stay with us for most of the game, hardly ever took advantage of our man-to-man advantages, threw sloppy passes out-of-bounds, and missed a ton of easy baskets underneath. If Scotty isn't shooting the three well in the first half, we likely go to the half down to....errrr....College of Charleston.
I wonder what the blind advocates of our current state of coaching will have to say about this game.
Again, I LOVE what CBP has brought to the program. But, at what point does it become painfully obvious that we are clueless when we have to slow down and play offense?
We will lose some games this year because we can't shoot foul shots. Book It!!!!!
My experiences show its human nature to build up and then tear down. The Pearl era is past the build up point which occurred during the first 3 years and is now well into the tear down phase. Contrast the content of this basketball page to the football page where nearly every post is building up Kiffin and the team. Anymore I try to stay away from this page as much as possible (although I occassionally check in to see if anything new and interesting gets posted - which usually isn't the case). The negative energy just turns me off.Fail.
Tennessee is shooting almost .750 from the line this year which is better than any single team Pearl has coached so far.
Also, another FAIL to whoever said that Tyler Smith is the only one shooting freethrows since he is averaging a 7th best on the team (out of 11).
Seriously, I'm not understanding all the negativity from so many fans on this board. It's not even December yet and we've only lost to 1 team (which happend to be an underachieving Purdue team that is ranked in the top 10 with an incredible amount of talent). Kind of surprises me that so many people would slam the Vols tonight for playing Charleston so close. Goudelock and Simmons have been the bread and butter for this team. Goudelock was an absolute no factor and Simmons had 5 baskets inside and went to the freethrow line 8 times to still get under his average. Monroe??? He made 1 three before this game and just shot lights out. They do tend to go in sometimes. I don't understand why when we play a team from a bottom feeder conference people just assume we should blow the doors right off the gym. Charleston has a great coach, decent guard play and they've had the privelages of playing teams like UNC, Temple a few times, South Carolina, Arkansas, Kentucky, Vilinova, VCU, etc.. so playing in TBA wouldn't bother any of 'em. Also, maybe the team was tired. I don't really give a damn about their fatigue level for a tournament that is 3 months away when they have plenty of games for that. They did play a lot of games and they did practice pretty hard yesterday. We won!! and by 17 points. If so much judgement is going to be taken into consideration...I wouldn't bother picking and choosing....I'd actually consider it all! :furious3:
I like Bruce as a coach. You don't. Like all things there is no middle ground. So all that is left is someones opinion which doesn't change anything.
Kiddiedoc....hater of all things Pearl....lol:
Reading comprehension can be your friend. Liking or disliking Bruce Pearl has nothing to do with the development of a competent half court offense. If we don't have one in March, we will not make a deep run.
Saying you are "tired" 4 days later is not acceptable. It certainly doesn't bode well when your are expecting a deep tourney run.
There definitely was a lack of energy...maybe it was the jet-lag. But I do know one thing that just absolutely bugged the shat out of me, and that was the fact that B Williams and S Maze talked and laughed all the way through the National Anthem. That, along with our perimeter defense bugged the hell outta me.