Amateur Hour Continues

[Velo Vol]

Would You use it to compare her thoughts on what is impeachable with Bush vs Trump ? Because that’s what is being compared . She had / has control over both .

No. If you want to know what her thoughts were on Bush, impeachment, and the Iraq war, I'd go back to what she said at the time, which was probably more coherent than in that town hall clip.

 

[Purple Tiger]

[QUOTE="0nelilreb, post: 17715711, member: 34572"]Ignorance isn’t a bad thing , it’s just a lack of knowledge or understanding . You can’t fix stupid though . I was merely pointing out facts to you , the path you take is up to you .[/QUOTE]

You're confessing again.

 

[Purple Tiger]

Stupid is obviously a genetic trait in that family.

 

[RockyTop85]

Had it not wrote about him, Trump would never in 100 years have cited Christianity Today.

Guess they lost a "reader". LOL

But is there any indication that their readers will go with them over Trump?

It’s interesting, but I’m skeptical that it’s significant.

 

[0nelilreb]

No. If you want to know what her thoughts were on Bush, impeachment, and the Iraq war, I'd go back to what she said at the time, which was probably more coherent than in that town hall clip.

She just told you what her thoughts were . Spin them anyway you want, but you literally watched and heard her tell you what she was thinking .

 

[Velo Vol]

She just told you what her thoughts were . Spin them anyway you want, but you literally watched and heard her tell you what she was thinking .

No. As I said, her answer there is rambling and it's hard to make sense of exactly what she's saying about impeaching Bush.

But even if it was coherent, there's still the problem of her explanation coming 10+ years after the fact. Even the best of us unintentionally change our stories over time. If you really want to know why she didn't support impeaching Bush, you should go back to what she said at the time.

What does this have to do with general (Christian) morality, anyway?

 

[Velo Vol]

But is there any indication that their readers will go with them over Trump?

It’s interesting, but I’m skeptical that it’s significant.

Do editorials ever change many minds on issues where opinions have largely crystallized? I doubt it.

The most that can come from this is a renewed debate on Trump's lack of morals.

One really telling moment for me came in 2016 or 2017. I can't remember off the top of my head, but an interviewer asked Trump an open-ended question that touched on his view of the Bible or general morality.

His response: "I won the evangelical vote!"

For him, it's purely transactional--he'll scratch their back (judges) if they support him. I'm hard pressed to think of examples where questions of morality even seem to enter his mind.

 

[0nelilreb]

No. As I said, her answer there is rambling and it's hard to make sense of exactly what she's saying about impeaching Bush.

But even if it was coherent, there's still the problem of her explanation coming 10+ years after the fact. Even the best of us unintentionally change our stories over time. If you really want to know why she didn't support impeaching Bush, you should go back to what she said at the time.

What does this have to do with general (Christian) morality, anyway?

So was she lying then or now ? The speaker of the house , the one wearing that staff on her dress , the keeper of our democracy , is a lying pandering politician that changes her views according to circumstances. Just like all the rest of them . My point is they are all lying politicians if you want to go on Luthers scale we can discuss what the cost was for not impeaching one president she said she knew was lying vs the one now she says is lying .

 

[Velo Vol]

So was she lying then or now ? The speaker of the house , the one wearing that staff on her dress , the keeper of our democracy , is a lying pandering politician that changes her views according to circumstances. Just like all the rest of them . My point is they are all lying politicians if you want to go on Luthers scale we can discuss what the cost was for not impeaching one president she said she knew was lying vs the one now she says is lying .

Looking at a couple quotes from back then it seems an important factor is she didn't think she had the votes for impeachment. If that makes her a liar, so be it.

Why Pelosi Opposes Impeachment

 

[Velo Vol]

 

[0nelilreb]

Looking at a couple quotes from back then it seems an important factor is she didn't think she had the votes for impeachment. If that makes her a liar, so be it.

Why Pelosi Opposes Impeachment

So she gave up her principles that she’s screeching now about and the “threat to our democracy “ for votes . Got it .

 

[hog88]

Amash is right. This bill is chocked full of BS.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

I never intended to supply any. My response was to a question: Did I trust the government to run healthcare? I said not one run by Trump.

Hope is a terrible strategy.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

So she gave up her principles that she’s screeching now about and the “threat to our democracy “ for votes . Got it .

I have said this before, but I ALMOST... feel sorry for her. Her party has been hijacked by the moron wing, and she knows it is only a matter of time before it goes down in flames. But she is such a colossal douche that I don't care if she loses her mind.

 

[0nelilreb]

[QUOTE="0nelilreb, post: 17715711, member: 34572"]Ignorance isn’t a bad thing , it’s just a lack of knowledge or understanding . You can’t fix stupid though . I was merely pointing out facts to you , the path you take is up to you .

You're confessing again.[/QUOTE]

I see you’ve choose your path . Smh .

 

[utvolpj]

Just more small govt things from our conservative potus

 

[NurseGoodVol]

Who called “Christianity Today is a far left/progressive magazine” for their Trump Twitter Bingo card?

Have never read anything from them. No clue.

 

[hog88]

Just more small govt things from our conservative potus

Paid family leave is bull. He should have never signed that crap.

 

[Orangeslice13]

Just more small govt things from our conservative potus

There is no “small government”representation

 

[NurseGoodVol]

Just more small govt things from our conservative potus

He's not a fiscal conservative. My biggest gripe with trump. STOP wasting our tax dollars!! Only thing he's done is reduce foreign aid spending by 18B. Drop in the ocean.

 

[RockyTop85]

Do editorials ever change many minds on issues where opinions have largely crystallized? I doubt it.

The most that can come from this is a renewed debate on Trump's lack of morals.

One really telling moment for me came in 2016 or 2017. I can't remember off the top of my head, but an interviewer asked Trump an open-ended question that touched on his view of the Bible or general morality.

His response: "I won the evangelical vote!"

For him, it's purely transactional--he'll scratch their back (judges) if they support him. I'm hard pressed to think of examples where questions of morality even seem to enter his mind.

I think you’re right.

We seem to be in an age where undue attention is given to personal opinions. I see so many news articles about what somebody said on Twitter when it’s just an opinion. Then this made all kinds of news and it’s just an opinion.

 

[Mick]

I think you’re right.

We seem to be in an age where undue attention is given to personal opinions. I see so many news articles about what somebody said on Twitter when it’s just an opinion. Then this made all kinds of news and it’s just an opinion.

People don't seek truth, they seek confirmation which is easier to find.

 

[hog88]

People don't seek truth, they seek confirmation which is easier to find.

Wisest thing you have ever posted.

 

[37L1]

People don't seek truth, they seek confirmation which is easier to find.

That isn't everybody just because that's what you do.

 

[Velo Vol]

So she gave up her principles that she’s screeching now about and the “threat to our democracy “ for votes . Got it .

Otherwise known as picking your battles.