The words may be consistent, the “message” is not.
There are people who think Trump is an abnormally awful president without needing to engage in pretend outrage, partisanship, or selective acceptance. If you were genuinely worried about right and wrong or even just being correct, you’d internalize that and consider it as a possibility.
But you don’t ever consider that possibility. Any critics saying otherwise must be acting in bad faith, according to you, with no factual justification necessary to back up that assessment.
That’s the incongruence.
Anybody worried about being correct would need to reconcile challenges to their opinion. You don’t. Instead, you make **** up to pigeonhole any challenging statement into whatever category of bad faith is convenient at the moment. It’s intellectually dishonest and nobody needs to do that unless they have an agenda. And it’s certainly not consistent with an agenda of “wrong is wrong.”
Not sure if it’s about trolling, defending Trump, or something else. Either way it’s bizarre behavior and hard to take it seriously, although apparently some people still do, based on the responses you got. Kudos, I guess.