Russell shot almost 60%, had 40 blocks, and > 5 rebounds while playing only 18 minutes per game,,,, on 2 bad feet. That's statistically better than what EW did playing > 36 minutes(avg).
EW was first string. Mercedes was not. EW was on the court against the best. When the game was tight, then Izzy was playing, not Mercedes.
Even if you do the 40 minute statistics (pts/rebounds/blocks), EW is still ahead.
EW: 18.1/10/4
MR: 13.6/10.8/2.5
For good measure, let's add Nia Moore
NM: 14.6/13.3/4.5
No one will suggest that Nia is better than EW or MR because of her "statistical" superiority.
If she had not deferred so much to Izzy & Graves she'd have done better.
If she was a better player that Holly could have left on the court more against the better competition, then she would have done better. She had one move: layup when she catches the ball facing the basket. And she hit 60% of those. I didn't know if this was the result of the injury or her game was that one dimensional, but she didn't look like anything other than a tall girl shooting over shorter opponents.
But, like I said. I personally have NEVER seen (on TV) EW play a dominant and impressive game. Most of the time she gets dominated. disclaimer.. most of those games were against UConn UNC ND and the like.... but still... facts are facts...
UConn will make pretty much any player look silly. Chiney looked positively average anytime they played.
Here's how EW did against the rest of the competition last year. I didn't include the first game against ND where she stunk it up, but everyone is entitled to a bad game. Overall, she has been very solid. The numbers don't lie, and like you said...facts are facts
Game 2 vs. ND last year: 20pts/6rbd/2blk/52% FG
Game 3 s. ND last year: 17pts/16rbd/3blk/54% FG
Game vs. MD last year: 17pts/11rbd/3blk/50%
3 Games vs. UNC last year: 17pts/8rbs/45%FG