Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court

[hog88]

LOL.........rightfully balancing the field is hardly political terrorism.

Rightfully? Rightfully would be having control over the senate and WH when the next vacancies come up. What you are advocating is a childish temper tantrum.

 

[Fun coupon VOL]

Amy Coney Barrett voted in a mock court to keep Obamacare

 

[37L1]

Rightfully? Rightfully would be having control over the senate and WH when the next vacancies come up. What you are advocating is a childish temper tantrum.

No, no, no, no. You don't get it. luther is a liberal therefore he sees everything as an entitlement. They are entitled to that seat on the SCOTUS.

 

[luthervol]

Rightfully? Rightfully would be having control over the senate and WH when the next vacancies come up. What you are advocating is a childish temper tantrum.

When was having control of both ever a necessity? Oh yea, 2016.

 

[PointGuard]

Didn't we have a black president for 8 years? How is it that he allowed it to continue? This systemic thingy.... how is it that it still exists? Or did Trump start that all up? Bottom line is that I guess Zero sucked as bad as we have been telling you since he basically accomplished nothing after he lost the senate.

It will exist as long as long as many people on here continue to have the opions they ha ve and pass them down to their children

 

[luthervol]

Historical precedent tells us that politically packing the court when you don't get your way should be opposed by almost everyone regardless of party. Why are you trying to change this precedent?

I was hoping the repubs would follow that precedent.

 

[hog88]

No, no, no, no. You don't get it. luther is a liberal therefore he sees everything as an entitlement. They are entitled to that seat on the SCOTUS.

Ahh, since you put it that way we should give it to them since they are entitled.

 

[utvolpj]

I was hoping the repubs would follow that precedent.

You simply don't get it. Precedent says a potus can fill empty seats. Precedent says everyone should oppose creating more seats simply because you don't like the courts makeup

 

[hog88]

When was having control of both ever a necessity? Oh yea, 2016.

You know how the confirmation process works?

 

[luthervol]

You simply don't get it. Precedent says a potus can fill empty seats. Precedent says everyone should oppose creating more seats simply because you don't like the courts makeup

You're saying Obama should have filled the empty seat in 2016? I agree. He wasn't allowed to. The seat was stolen.

 

[luthervol]

You know how the confirmation process works?

I do. It has never been necessary prior to 2016 when the seat was stolen.

 

[37L1]

You're saying Obama should have filled the empty seat in 2016? I agree. He wasn't allowed to. The seat was stolen.

By legal means, so that means it wasn't "stolen", just denied.

 

[utvolpj]

You're saying Obama should have filled the empty seat in 2016? I agree. He wasn't allowed to. The seat was stolen.

Yes he should have had the chance. Wouldn't have mattered since he didn't have the support from the Senate but a no vote should have occurred. Nothing was stolen though since he simply didn't get an interview for the job

Now address the precedent being shoved to the side when this idiotic stunt was tried before

 

[C-south]

Amy Coney Barrett voted in a mock court to keep Obamacare

It’s all about the mandate. Without it I don’t see how it’s even feasible.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Well today’s debates look like a bust apparently it’s just a debate to strike down the ACA or not again.

 

[hog88]

I do. It has never been necessary prior to 2016 when the seat was stolen.

What has never been necessary? Senate confirmation?

Also, Obama didn't own that seat so it couldn't have been stolen.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

It will exist as long as long as many people on here continue to have the opions they ha ve and pass them down to their children

So in other words, it is wired into everyone. What you won't acknowledge is that we are all different. You want us to be like the gray people in the memes, but the only way you have of doing that is at point of a gun... which by the way, ONLY government will have... if you get your way. But then you turn and hyphenate any group you feel is disenfranchised... African-American.... Gay-American.... So the hypocrisy right there is palpable. You want a homogenous society yet you want special treatment for some. Which is it, because it is in fact an either/or issue.

 

[luthervol]

By legal means, so that means it wasn't "stolen", just denied.

Again, you are saying that it is acceptable to do whatever is legally allowed in order to stack the court in your favor.....
without regards to precedent or ramifications.

 

[37L1]

Again, you are saying that it is acceptable to do whatever is legally allowed in order to stack the court in your favor.....
without regards to precedent or ramifications.

Kind of like you wanting Trump removed by any means (legal) possible, right there, luther?

"It all depends on whose ox is being gored."

 

[luthervol]

What has never been necessary? Senate confirmation?

Also, Obama didn't own that seat so it couldn't have been stolen.

That the Senate has to be controlled by the same party as the president in order to confirm.

 

[hog88]

Again, you are saying that it is acceptable to do whatever is legally allowed in order to stack the court in your favor.....
without regards to precedent or ramifications.

And the appropriate response would be to refuse to hold hearings/vote the next time an R is in his last year and the Dems have the senate. What you are proposing is akin to shooting someone because they pulled your hair.

 

[C-south]

Again, you are saying that it is acceptable to do whatever is legally allowed in order to stack the court in your favor.....
without regards to precedent or ramifications.

Which is exactly what you spouted for years about removing Trump from office simply due to your TDS.

 

[luthervol]

Kind of like you wanting Trump removed by any means (legal) possible, right there, luther?

"It all depends on whose ox is being gored."

I still think he should have been removed by any legal means possible. If he is somehow inexplicably reelected, I will continue to feel that way.

 

[37L1]

I still think he should have been removed by any legal means possible. If he is somehow inexplicably reelected, I will continue to feel that way.

I am so shocked by this revelation.

Now apply it to the SCOTUS seat you feel entitled to.

 

[luthervol]

And the appropriate response would be to refuse to hold hearings/vote the next time an R is in his last year and the Dems have the senate. What you are proposing is akin to shooting someone because they pulled your hair.

Why not 18 months? Or maybe two years? Is one year the magic number now for the repubs?