AirVol
Let’s go Brandon
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2009
- Messages
- 23,657
- Likes
- 35,156
You are aware that Trump asked for and got Manafort's resignation in August 2016 for not disclosing money he was receiving from a pro Russian Ukranian group, right?There may be plenty there. An independent investigation will let us know. Trump is obviously afraid of something being discovered, otherwise he wouldn't be acting so paranoid and working so hard to thwart any investigation.
Please share how he is working hard to thwart an investigation?
Ha ha! You guys are always good for a laugh. LOL!Firing Bharara and Comey. Appointing Sessions as AG. False accusations toward Obama. Planting fake news leaks with Nunes. Threatening Comey. Claiming Comey told him he was not under investigation. Constantly using the term "fake news". Gaslighting from day 1. Creating an environment of fear and intimidation.
You are aware that Trump asked for and got Manafort's resignation in August 2016 for not disclosing money he was receiving from a pro Russian Ukranian group, right?
Are you even capable of talking about anything actually going on?
Firing Bharara and Comey. Appointing Sessions as AG. False accusations toward Obama. Planting fake news leaks with Nunes. Threatening Comey. Claiming Comey told him he was not under investigation. Constantly using the term "fake news". Gaslighting from day 1. Creating an environment of fear and intimidation.
I just got through 8 years of someone I hold in the same regard. Didn't lose any sleep over him.
Speaking of what's going on....
This may need its own thread.
A federal judge may have just paved the way for Barack Obama AND Hillary Clinton to be put on trial for TREASON.
U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson has ordered the State Department to turn over previously redacted information regarding what Obama and Clinton knew about and how they responded to the 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. Embassy in Benghazi.
https://conservativepost.com/federal-judge-issues-bombshell-ruling-against-obama/
Both emails had the subject line Quick Summary of POTUS Calls to Presidents of Libya and Egypt and were among the emails stored on Clintons unofficial email server. Judge Jackson reviewed the documents directly and rejected the governments contention that the records had been properly withheld under the FOIA B(5) deliberative process exemption.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-...ton-emails-detailing-obama-response-benghazi/
http://nypost.com/2017/05/05/judge-orders-state-department-to-release-more-benghazi-emails/
Sorry, but I can't stop laughing at your posts.That's where you're wrong. Had you felt toward Obama as many feel toward Trump, you would have lost lots of sleep and hopefully been much more vocal. Trump is in no way the right's equivalent to Obama. If that were true, I'd sleep okay, say little, and just wait it out (3 terms of Bush and 2 of Reagan). Trump is Rosie O'Donnell, not Obama. (I don't know that the Rosie comparison is strong enough - but that's the one I'll use for now) Wendy Williams may be better.
I would like to think that at some point, theoretically at least, that if you felt a president was so bad and potentially harmful to the US that you would feel morally obligated to do more than just sit quietly on the sideline.
Many are at that point with Trump and are doing what they think morally correct. Trump was just a horrible selection from the start. The warnings were there all along and that sadly made him more attractive in the eyes of many. I think that last point is what truly pushed it over the tipping point.
I would like to think that at some point, theoretically at least, that if you felt a president was so bad and potentially harmful to the US that you would feel morally obligated to do more than just sit quietly on the sideline.
Trump is a hell of a lot more shrewd than you think.
He just doesn't give a damn what anybody thinks, and it is a shock to some of you folks.
He isn't a politician. He isn't scripted. Did you fall for all the crap that Obama read off a teleprompter or something?He's probably about as smart as I think. He is shrewd in some ways, but that only is part of being an executive. One problem is he's as outwardly dumb as they come. Did you see his interview with the Economist? He made three false statements in a matter of a few sentences, one being the claim that he invented the phrase "priming the pump". These sort of gaffes are so common people can't even keep up with all of them.
This has nothing to do with having good decorum, policy, or being intelligent. You can be smart and behave and not care about the detractors. But he acts like a ****ing childish idiot and doesn't care. Good for him, I guess.