Anti-Trump Hysteria and Silliness

The left-wing mob is going after Tiger as well.

They come for you if you are not of the body....the body of orange man hate that is.

maxresdefault.jpg
 
I'm not buying it. To me (and you guys will disagree) that's like saying there are no good guys (or gals) entering the military any longer.
One doesn't have to corrupt themselves to get elected into the military. As with most of your equivalencies, this one is false.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1
Ah, the First Amendment. How could our founding fathers been so stupid.

Who posted that she shouldn't have the right to speak in public? The problem with speaking in public is that it shows the public what kind of person you are, which is what people are commenting on. They weren't stupid. The system is working perfectly.

Peddle harder. You need to keep up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1
One doesn't have to corrupt themselves to get elected into the military. As with most of your equivalencies, this one is false.
One doesn't have to corrupt themselves to get elected into politics. Now as they move up the chain, corruption abounds in business, military, politics, etc....
 
Last edited:
One doesn't have to corrupt themselves to get elected into politics. Now as they move up the chain, corruptions abounds in business, military, politics, etc....

I would disagree. However, the mode of entry to each of the examples given shows that you gave false equivalencies, as is your habit.

However, your greater problem is the proletariat ethics you espoused in later posts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1
His greater problem is that he is bat sh!t crazy.
I won't comment, as all I know is an internet personna.

The problem with his arguments is that he has repeatedly presented a proletariat ethic, in that actions aren't moral/immoral, while also calling others (like Trump) immoral and deserving of judgment. His "ends justify the means" morality lacks substance unless he can give a reason that his end goal is morally superior to anyone else's.

For instance, his end goal is the establishment of socialism, and certain actions (like lying or verbally assaulting others) in order to further that cause are acceptable. But when Trump does the same things to fight the establishment of socialism, he's evil. Luther claims that Trump is evil for lying and verbally assaulting others. He claims he's evil for all manner of things. But he's not actually claiming that Trump is evil for having done those things. Luther has defended and would defend those things in his heroes of the revolution.

No. Trump is evil for being an enemy to the revolution. Period. Luther tries to doctor it up in all manner of ways to hide his root ethic, but he's let slip his Machiavellian ethic too many times.

The problem with his ethic (the ends justify the means), in tandem with his completey relative morality (no means is actually any better than any other) is that every time he defends his heroes, he's defending Trump because Trump's means are just as justified by his ends.
 
I won't comment, as all I know is an internet personna.

The problem with his arguments is that he has repeatedly presented a proletariat ethic, in that actions aren't moral/immoral, while also calling others (like Trump) immoral and deserving of judgment. His "ends justify the means" morality lacks substance unless he can give a reason that his end goal is morally superior to anyone else's.

For instance, his end goal is the establishment of socialism, and certain actions (like lying or verbally assaulting others) in order to further that cause are acceptable. But when Trump does the same things to fight the establishment of socialism, he's evil. Luther claims that Trump is evil for lying and verbally assaulting others. He claims he's evil for all manner of things. But he's not actually claiming that Trump is evil for having done those things. Luther has defended and would defend those things in his heroes of the revolution.

No. Trump is evil for being an enemy to the revolution. Period. Luther tries to doctor it up in all manner of ways to hide his root ethic, but he's let slip his Machiavellian ethic too many times.

The problem with his ethic (the ends justify the means), in tandem with his completey relative morality (no means is actually any better than any other) is that every time he defends his heroes, he's defending Trump because Trump's means are just as justified by his ends.
Trolluther's posts can all be summed up simply:

Rational (not), reasonable (not), continuum, TDS, gun control, free stuff, stupid false equivalencies.

There is no other content because he is willfully ignorant.

When pressed about what makes Trump, in his mind, so despicable, he can't even give a rational and reasonable explanation other than his feelz. All the reasons he gives have been done over and over again by liberal Democrats, with whom he has voiced no problem on the scale of his TDS.

I believe he has masochistic tendencies and gets off trolling here and getting abused.

This is what he likes receiving:

tenor.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77

VN Store



Back
Top