508mikey
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2011
- Messages
- 60,497
- Likes
- 49,844
I have been reading all the articles this week about how UConn's excellence is bad for women's basketball. Apparently a lot of WCBB fans would rather see two crappy teams shoot in the 30% range, turn the ball over 25 time each, commit 25 fouls each, and have 5 or 6 assists for the entire game with a final score of 43-42 as long as one team scores the winning basket at the buzzer. I would rather watch athletes pursue perfection and watch for the beauty of the sport instead of the competitive nature of the game or the score.
I never liked golf, but I watched Tiger Woods on Sundays when he was doing things no other golfer could do (before the world knew he was a pig). I also enjoyed watching Steffi Graf in her prime, the Spanish National Soccer team with their passing skills, and Torvill and Dean when they were destroying all takers on the ice. I have respect for anyone who makes it their mission to be the best they can be, whether it be in sports or any other aspect of their life.
But for those who worship mediocrity, here are two options:
1. Rather than have an NCAA tournament, why not just give everyone a participation trophy at the end of the regular season so there are no losers and no one suffers low self-esteem.
2. Have a tournament but do not keep score in the game. Each team is required to give every player on the bench equal playing time. At the end of the game, flip a coin to determine which team moves on to the next round. This way everyone has an equal opportunity at being a national champion.
Are we really becoming a society where we resent and punish success, and we reward and compensate people for their failures?
Still it will take an upset of UConn to get more people interested again -- If the WNBA paid better some of these UConn players would be one and dones every season