Haith did what anyone on VN could do with that squad. I can see the reasoning, but a stupid choice in my book. As good as TR was at Kansas, I don't think anyone can argue against Davis as the choice.
Everyone laughing at Haith...opinions for COY???
And don't say cal, because your argument against haith is he did what was expected. Well cal has also done basically what was expected.
So who deserves COY?
Groce? Pitino? Painter? Cronin?
Although much of the media would gasp at the notion, I think Boehiem would have to be high on the list as well considering the adversity and problems he trudged through to get his team where he did.
Although much of the media would gasp at the notion, I think Boehiem would have to be high on the list as well considering the adversity and problems he trudged through to get his team where he did.
I also said that I understood the reasoning. You have to pick Haith, it's the logical choice in terms of a program achieving more than most thought, in his first year. What I'm saying is that the coach didn't elevate the program, the program elevated the coach. He is average, and Mizzou will be also in a few seasons.
Haith got handed a good team. Let's see how they are next year. Cal took a bunch of freshmen and made them the best team in the nation.
Everyone laughing at Haith...opinions for COY???
And don't say cal, because your argument against haith is he did what was expected. Well cal has also done basically what was expected.
So who deserves COY?
Groce? Pitino? Painter? Cronin?
Haith got handed a good team. Let's see how they are next year. Cal took a bunch of freshmen and made them the best team in the nation.
If you expected the best defensive team in the country and only two losses and an undefeated SEC season, then you had high expectations.