To illustrate, in the most accurate manner possible, the reality of what is happening over there.
So which of the following pictures illustrate, most accurately, what is happening in Afghanistan? A picture only captures a specific moment, situation, and/or place in time. OE, I couldn't agree more that war is hell and that everyone should support and respect our troops (and families) for their service and sacrifice... and I do. However, that doesn't mean the press should publish pictures (against the family's request) when it is not necessary.
View attachment 21748
View attachment 21749
View attachment 21750
View attachment 21751
View attachment 21752
I wouldn't have to, the mother knew how great her son was. The country needs to know that also.
The burden of losing soldiers should not be limited to the family.
These are our soldiers who die for us. We need to honor them.
The kid died for his country. What more glorious death can there be? At least he'll be vividly remembered, unlike the thousands and thousand of his American brethren that met the same fate in the history of this nation.
LG and OE,
Both of you express a desire to honor the soldier and yet you would dishonor him not to listen to his families wishes. I am not against showing video of war but find someone whose family would want this.
You want realities of war? It extends beyond the battle field and it causes extreme harm to the family who does not want their private pain to be shared with the world just so someone THINKS they can get a point across.
or perhaps you fail to realize that their son just became a recruiting video for the very thing he died trying to defeat?
The kid died for his country. What more glorious death can there be? At least he'll be vividly remembered, unlike the thousands and thousand of his American brethren that met the same fate in the history of this nation.
I cannot fault journalists for doing their job. The underlying and unfortunate fact is that the end reader wants to see the photo, i.e. it sells. If the end reader chose not to buy the product, then there would be no story here.
Gate's makes a valid point in saying that publishing the photo is indecent...so is war. There is not much decent about war and any decency that was left in the Afghanistan theatre is crumbling by the day.
For a public that thinks they are shat...... absolutely.
I still go with what LG and TRUT said......
People need to know what our guys and gals are doing for them.
Soldiers and their families should not have to carry this burden alone. The job is thankless to begin with.
We, the public, need to change our attitudes toward them.
You saw him in death, you saw nor heard what he has done in life. You want people to know? Then where is the beginning of this story. All you know is the end.
The vast majority of the public doesn not think they are shat, and for the scum that do these photos only provide propoganda material to exploit.
The families should have a say in whether or not these photos get published. It's as simple as that. I can't think of a good reason....legally, morally, or ethically as to why this shouldn't be the case.