BanditVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2012
- Messages
- 4,808
- Likes
- 3,605
Wow I didn't think it was possible.Before someone asks, yes Tennessee does have a scenario...it requires a 3-team tie with Texas, Ole Miss, and TN all at 2-conference losses
That would require:
4-6 Kentucky beating 9-1 Texas
4-6 Auburn beating 9-2 A&M
Texas beating A&M
5-5 Oklahoma or 4-6 Auburn beating Alabama
Ole Miss beating BOTH Florida AND Miss State
And Tennessee beating Vanderbilt
The team would be the second spot participant in the conference championship (winning the tiebreaker with Ole Miss and Texas based on record vs common conference opponents Oklahoma, Kentucky, and Mississippi State, with Tennessee being (3-0) against them while Ole Miss and Texas would now be (2-1), having each lost to Kentucky in that scenario). The result would be them playing Georgia (again)...In Atlanta, GA.
But I think that might be absolutely it.
Texas and ole miss beat Arkansas? We would be 3-1 and they would be 3-1 against common opponentsBefore someone asks, yes Tennessee does have a scenario...it requires a 3-team tie with Texas, Ole Miss, and TN all at 2-conference losses
That would require:
4-6 Kentucky beating 9-1 Texas
4-6 Auburn beating 9-2 A&M
Texas beating A&M
5-5 Oklahoma or 4-6 Auburn beating Alabama
Ole Miss beating BOTH Florida AND Miss State
And Tennessee beating Vanderbilt
The team would be the second spot participant in the conference championship (winning the tiebreaker with Ole Miss and Texas based on record vs common conference opponents Oklahoma, Kentucky, and Mississippi State, with Tennessee being (3-0) against them while Ole Miss and Texas would now be (2-1), having each lost to Kentucky in that scenario). The result would be them playing Georgia (again)...In Atlanta, GA.
But I think that might be absolutely it.
Before someone asks, yes Tennessee does have a scenario...it requires a 3-team tie with Texas, Ole Miss, and TN all at 2-conference losses
That would require:
4-6 Kentucky beating 9-1 Texas
4-6 Auburn beating 9-2 A&M
Texas beating A&M
5-5 Oklahoma or 4-6 Auburn beating Alabama
Ole Miss beating BOTH Florida AND Miss State
And Tennessee beating Vanderbilt
The team would be the second spot participant in the conference championship (winning the tiebreaker with Ole Miss and Texas based on record vs common conference opponents Oklahoma, Kentucky, and Mississippi State, with Tennessee being (3-0) against them while Ole Miss and Texas would now be (2-1), having each lost to Kentucky in that scenario). The result would be them playing Georgia (again)...In Atlanta, GA.
But I think that might be absolutely it.
Man that is a lot!Before someone asks, yes Tennessee does have a scenario...it requires a 3-team tie with Texas, Ole Miss, and TN all at 2-conference losses
That would require:
4-6 Kentucky beating 9-1 Texas
4-6 Auburn beating 9-2 A&M
Texas beating A&M
5-5 Oklahoma or 4-6 Auburn beating Alabama
Ole Miss beating BOTH Florida AND Miss State
And Tennessee beating Vanderbilt
The team would be the second spot participant in the conference championship (winning the tiebreaker with Ole Miss and Texas based on record vs common conference opponents Oklahoma, Kentucky, and Mississippi State, with Tennessee being (3-0) against them while Ole Miss and Texas would now be (2-1), having each lost to Kentucky in that scenario). The result would be them playing Georgia (again)...In Atlanta, GA.
But I think that might be absolutely it.
He said Bama is a lock in his postYou linked it incorrectly...it's leading to an internal service error screen
mred's SEC FB Standings Generator
Southeastern Conference Football Standings with Tiebreakersbball.notnothing.net
Also - with the multiple team tiebreaker leading to conference opponent winning percentage - Alabama would be the second team in regardless of whether Texas beats TAMU or TAMU beats Texas.
Wouldn't Mizzou losing to Miss st and Arkansas also change the tiebreaker set up??Before someone asks, yes Tennessee does have a scenario...it requires a 3-team tie with Texas, Ole Miss, and TN all at 2-conference losses
That would require:
4-6 Kentucky beating 9-1 Texas
4-6 Auburn beating 9-2 A&M
Texas beating A&M
5-5 Oklahoma or 4-6 Auburn beating Alabama
Ole Miss beating BOTH Florida AND Miss State
And Tennessee beating Vanderbilt
The team would be the second spot participant in the conference championship (winning the tiebreaker with Ole Miss and Texas based on record vs common conference opponents Oklahoma, Kentucky, and Mississippi State, with Tennessee being (3-0) against them while Ole Miss and Texas would now be (2-1), having each lost to Kentucky in that scenario). The result would be them playing Georgia (again)...In Atlanta, GA.
But I think that might be absolutely it.
That isn't really that far-fetched. I could see that happening. Obviously, it isn't a likely scenario, but its possible. I won't be shocked if those results happen like that.Before someone asks, yes Tennessee does have a scenario...it requires a 3-team tie with Texas, Ole Miss, and TN all at 2-conference losses
That would require:
4-6 Kentucky beating 9-1 Texas
4-6 Auburn beating 9-2 A&M
Texas beating A&M
5-5 Oklahoma or 4-6 Auburn beating Alabama
Ole Miss beating BOTH Florida AND Miss State
And Tennessee beating Vanderbilt
The team would be the second spot participant in the conference championship (winning the tiebreaker with Ole Miss and Texas based on record vs common conference opponents Oklahoma, Kentucky, and Mississippi State, with Tennessee being (3-0) against them while Ole Miss and Texas would now be (2-1), having each lost to Kentucky in that scenario). The result would be them playing Georgia (again)...In Atlanta, GA.
But I think that might be absolutely it.
You don't think Bama losing to Auburn or Oklahoma AND kentucky beating Texas is far-fetched? And that's not even all that has to happen.That isn't really that far-fetched. I could see that happening. Obviously, it isn't a likely scenario, but its possible. I won't be shocked if those results happen like that.
Well, UK damn near beat UGA in Lexington this year and they beat Ole Mill on the road. So, it isn't crazy to think its possible for UK to beat TX.You don't think Bama losing to Auburn or Oklahoma AND kentucky beating Texas is far-fetched? And that's not even all that has to happen.
Possible? I guess. Far-fetched? Extremely!Well, UK damn near beat UGA in Lexington this year and they beat Ole Mill on the road. So, it isn't crazy to think its possible for UK to beat TX.
And, Alabama, as good as they have been, did lose to Vanderbilt on the road. So, it's possible.
You think that isn't possible? I think it is. We shall both see!
GBO
Texas and ole miss beat Arkansas? We would be 3-1 and they would be 3-1 against common opponents
Not quite, but my bad in that I didn't understand/explain well what I had been given back by the system (and I will update the original post to relay what I'm correcting/clarifying below.)Correction, sorry Ole Miss would be in because all 3 also played UGA but Ole Miss got the win. 3-2 while Ole Miss would be 4-1
Wouldn't Mizzou losing to Miss st and Arkansas also change the tiebreaker set up??
Has absolutely no effect relative to TN when it comes to the tie-breaking picture. Tennessee didn't play Missouri (so their outcome, be it 9-3 or 7-5, doesn't effect Tennessee's conference opponent strength of schedule).Missouri has 3 losses and is out of the picture.
Who said I was banking on this or thought it was likely? I started the comment off with "before someone asks, yes Tennessee does have a scenario" as in "someone or someones are going to start asking 'Does Tennessee have a possible scenario?', 'Is there a set of results that still in favor of Tennessee?', etc".Possible? I guess. Far-fetched? Extremely!
The very first thing on the list of what must happen (Kentucky beating Texas on the road) has a 5.3% chance of happening according to the ESPN game predictor. This isn't the same team that beat Ole Miss. They've lost 4 straight SEC games since then and lost by double digits in 3 of them. The other things that must go right aren't as daunting, but getting those ALL to happen in conjunction with Kentucky remembering how to play football has <1% chance of happening.
I'm going to spend my energy pulling against Ole Miss because that leads to a much more realistic scenario of making the playoffs (not the SEC Championship).
Has absolutely no effect relative to TN when it comes to the tie-breaking picture. Tennessee didn't play Missouri (so their outcome, be it 9-3 or 7-5, doesn't effect Tennessee's conference opponent strength of schedule).
With only 2 games left, the gap between the conference opponent strength of schedule of the teams Missouri did play (namely A&M and Alabama), is pretty close to fixed...both are pretty far ahead of Tennessee's (Alabama's is looking to finish above .500, A&M's is looking to finish around .440-.450, while Tennessee's is likely looking to finish somewhere in the .300s, with it likely being around .350...it can potentially hit around .450-.460, but that requires a clusterf--k next week results-wise, and if Tennessee ends up with an individual tiebreaker with Texas A&M, it would lose the common opponents tiebreaker - consisting of Florida, Arkansas, and Mississippi State 2-1).
I don't think anyone said you were banking on it, TO. I was replying to another poster.Who said I was banking on this or thought it was likely? I started the comment off with "before someone asks, yes Tennessee does have a scenario" as in "someone or someones are going to start asking 'Does Tennessee have a possible scenario?', 'Is there a set of results that still in favor of Tennessee?', etc".
I was just posting it and answering about that before it got started...mostly to quell any rush of guesses before too much speculation got rolling.
I was talking about in regards to Bama and the tiebreaker they currently hold that would send them to the SECCG. If Mizzou losses the next 2 then their strength of schedule changes which I assume would change the tiebreaker method.Has absolutely no effect relative to TN when it comes to the tie-breaking picture. Tennessee didn't play Missouri (so their outcome, be it 9-3 or 7-5, doesn't effect Tennessee's conference opponent strength of schedule).
With only 2 games left, the gap between the conference opponent strength of schedule of the teams Missouri did play (namely A&M and Alabama), is pretty close to fixed...both are pretty far ahead of Tennessee's (Alabama's is looking to finish above .500, A&M's is looking to finish around .440-.450, while Tennessee's is likely looking to finish somewhere in the .300s, with it likely being around .350...it can potentially hit around .450-.460, but that requires a clusterf--k next week results-wise, and if Tennessee ends up with an individual tiebreaker with Texas A&M, it would lose the common opponents tiebreaker - consisting of Florida, Arkansas, and Mississippi State 2-1).
I'm not talking about Mizzou being in the picture. I'm talking about Bama's strength of schedule changing if Mizzou doesn't win their last 2. My impression is Bama has the tiebreaker right now because of their schedule, Mizzou losing to State & Arkansa would change thatMissouri has 3 losses and is out of the picture.