Good point. But are we paying 11-1 money for a 9-3 Staff?
Would you call that the work of "folks in the know"?
Go Vols.
By the way ... nice post and I get where you are at!!!
If you notice the money was NOT distributed 'equally.' Which might suggest who we want to "protect" from departing.
Also, adding another year is a vote of confidence.
However, I am predicting that we will see turnover after this season, and record has nothing to do with it (in my mind).
If your number had been 10-2, I would have said absolutely.
I thought 11-1 was being overly exuberant, but that is just me.
Frankly, I would be grudgingly okay with 9-3, ... but I need to be honest and say I still think 10-2 is possible (and it is what I thought we would do before the first game).
Why would you be okay with 9-3? You ask!
1) Because Elijah Herring was ill prepared for the game and they took advantage of his inexperience for the full first quarter. I was afraid of that and yep it happened.
2) Because the penalty calls in the Florida game were really bad and that makes a huge difference in my mind. I'm not calling it home cooking, but it was egregious. (South Carolina game was bad as well.)
3) We did not have Mays back guiding the O-line.
4) It was an away game and away games are harder. And there are a few more things, but I am going to keep those to my self because I do not want to bring them out into the light of day. (Don't ask.)