genuinelsutiger
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2007
- Messages
- 125
- Likes
- 0
I stirred the sugar, water, and KoolAid mix together. I called it the day Saban signed. And it isn't JUST because of Saban.
If I'm wrong, please please please pull up the posts I've made on this and embarrass me.
I thought they'd be poised to win 9+ games in 2007 even before they fired Shula, and obviously trading him for Saban isn't going to hurt. I'd be very surprised if Alabama doesn't have a good season this fall.
of that, there is little doubt. they will be all hopped up for that game i'm sure.Unfortunately I think you are right. That game in Tuscaloosa is going to be a hornet's nest.
and that's a game that i just don't think CPF can afford to lose.......the opponent, the coach........losing that game this year would hurt more than usual.
and you still have Spurrier left on the schedule...I hadn't really thought about it, but you're right. Let us be pessimistic and say that it's possible Fulmer could go into that game having lost to both Meyer and Richt; if he were to lose that one to Saban, too, the sharks would really start circling.
and you still have Spurrier left on the schedule...
this year could go one of two ways..........it presents itself to be a crowning acheivment that makes a statement to the rest of the league, country and fans that, "uno momento, i'm not near as bad as many of you think" or it could serve as validation of what many already think.
but hey, no pressure. just win the SEC, and all is fine.:thumbsup:
lol.......i hear ya.It certainly has that feel of a make-or-break type year for Fulmer, doesn't it? Glory or ignominy; which will it be? Which of course means we'll probably go 9-4 again and be right back here saying the same thing next year.