Arizona Election Audit

#3,176
#3,176
Septic said:
Apparently having a username and password to a Wordpress blog give you automatic credibility with the red hats.
Click to expand...

The psychology of it all is so damn textbook, and that's the frustrating part. It's so formulaic it's almost scriptable.
 
#3,177
#3,177
Septic said:
I'm not sure what you mean, but everything I've posted today has been incredibly light work. This thread is such a low hanging punching bag, I almost feel bad about clowning on the folks who take it seriously.
Click to expand...
That's hilarious. I noticed you've ignored all the questions I asked about China Joe and his crooked ass shenanigans. Hypocrisy noted.
 
#3,180
#3,180
Septic said:
Not even individual cases like this move the needle with what you guys are claiming...

Republican official in Ohio faces charge for voting twice in November election

Call me when evidence is presented in court that shows widespread election fraud, until then stop posting twitter and telegram feeds and claiming there "proof."
Click to expand...
And also no, it isn’t widespread, but voter fraud is in areas just enough for Biden to steal it. You know yourself that it isn’t widespread. Those little places that you know that has already been named around.
 
#3,181
#3,181
Orange defense said:
And also no, it isn’t widespread, but voter fraud is in areas just enough for Biden to steal it. You know yourself that it isn’t widespread. Those little places that you know that has already been named around.
Click to expand...
Our elections are a cesspool. It's not just Democrats, it's the Republicans as well. It all needs to be exposed.
 
#3,182
#3,182
AshG said:
I have neither broadcast nor cable television and do not visit any of the ad-serviced news sites. Your assumption falls flat.
Click to expand...
You're criticizing a new source that you don't like while never criticizing liberal news sources. CNN and all the main stream media is no better than the ones you mentioned. You degrade people that view those sources as legitimate as if you're superior to them. It's condescending and goes against what you claim to be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT
#3,183
#3,183
Orange defense said:
And also no, it isn’t widespread, but voter fraud is in areas just enough for Biden to steal it. You know yourself that it isn’t widespread. Those little places that you know that has already been named around.
Click to expand...

You guys need to pick a lane, some of you just "can't believe" Joe got 81m votes, others of you hang your hat on the local election fraud stuff. Either way, either call me when proof is presented in court that shows verifiable, concerted election fraud.

Until then, it's all just theater.
 
#3,184
#3,184
tnmarktx said:
Our elections are a cesspool. It's not just Democrats, it's the Republicans as well. It all needs to be exposed.
Click to expand...
I agree. I don’t know how people are getting away with it? I know that voter is and showing proof of your address would be sufficient. That what Mississippi does. There would be no way for me to double vote, because I’m already in the system. It all needs to be exposed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tnmarktx
#3,185
#3,185
Septic said:
You guys need to pick a lane, some of you just "can't believe" Joe got 81m votes, others of you hang your hat on the local election fraud stuff. Either way, either call me when proof is presented in court that shows verifiable, concerted election fraud.

Until then, it's all just theater.
Click to expand...
There is no way that he got 81 million votes. The county in which Detroit is in had more votes there than the people live there. There is no way for that.
 
#3,190
#3,190
InVOLuntary said:
You're criticizing a new source that you don't like while never criticizing liberal news sources. CNN and all the main stream media is no better than the ones you mentioned. You degrade people that view those sources as legitimate as if you're superior to them. It's condescending and goes against what you claim to be.
Click to expand...

I am starting to think I need my statement on media in a file where I can copy and paste it whenever this comes up.

I criticize the news sources that are posted here. If people posted from those sites, I would be as critical of them as I am of others.

I have been overt in my distaste for far-left sources such as The Palmer Report and Mother Jones. I sincerely don't know of any others in that vein because I don't go looking for them. Why dig through garbage?

I do not like CNN. I do not like MSNBC. I do not like Fox News. Each of them may have some quality fact-first news and journalism going on, but the primary goal of those outlets is to make money through increased ad revenue by playing to their target audiences. They are entertainment that riffs on current events, nothing more.

My formula for assessing outlets has been posted frequently throughout this subforum. Recently, I even lauded the CRT Tracking Site by Legal Insurrection as a high quality conservative-leaning tool that is handling its topic in a completely transparent and professional manner. I've even bookmarked it because of its quality. But, I digress.

I wish everyone here were critical of sites that overtly insult, denigrate, mock, divide, and obfuscate. We all have skin in the game where quality information is concerned. I wish we were all so critical.
 
#3,191
#3,191
AshG said:
I am starting to think I need my statement on media in a file where I can copy and paste it whenever this comes up.

I criticize the news sources that are posted here. If people posted from those sites, I would be as critical of them as I am of others.

I have been overt in my distaste for far-left sources such as The Palmer Report and Mother Jones. I sincerely don't know of any others in that vein because I don't go looking for them. Why dig through garbage?

I do not like CNN. I do not like MSNBC. I do not like Fox News. Each of them may have some quality fact-first news and journalism going on, but the primary goal of those outlets is to make money through increased ad revenue by playing to their target audiences. They are entertainment that riffs on current events, nothing more.

My formula for assessing outlets has been posted frequently throughout this subforum. Recently, I even lauded the CRT Tracking Site by Legal Insurrection as a high quality conservative-leaning tool that is handling its topic in a completely transparent and professional manner. I've even bookmarked it because of its quality. But, I digress.

I wish everyone here were critical of sites that overtly insult, denigrate, mock, divide, and obfuscate. We all have skin in the game where quality information is concerned. I wish we were all so critical.
Click to expand...
We are critical. The AP, Reuters, BBC world, and the Christian Science Monitor sucks just like FOX does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#3,192
#3,192
AshG said:
I am starting to think I need my statement on media in a file where I can copy and paste it whenever this comes up.

I criticize the news sources that are posted here. If people posted from those sites, I would be as critical of them as I am of others.

I have been overt in my distaste for far-left sources such as The Palmer Report and Mother Jones. I sincerely don't know of any others in that vein because I don't go looking for them. Why dig through garbage?

I do not like CNN. I do not like MSNBC. I do not like Fox News. Each of them may have some quality fact-first news and journalism going on, but the primary goal of those outlets is to make money through increased ad revenue by playing to their target audiences. They are entertainment that riffs on current events, nothing more.

My formula for assessing outlets has been posted frequently throughout this subforum. Recently, I even lauded the CRT Tracking Site by Legal Insurrection as a high quality conservative-leaning tool that is handling its topic in a completely transparent and professional manner. I've even bookmarked it because of its quality. But, I digress.

I wish everyone here were critical of sites that overtly insult, denigrate, mock, divide, and obfuscate. We all have skin in the game where quality information is concerned. I wish we were all so critical.
Click to expand...
The problem is the main stream media is as far left as the ones you cite as far right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#3,193
#3,193
tnmarktx said:
We are critical. The AP, Reuters, BBC world, and the Christian Science Monitor sucks just like FOX does.
Click to expand...

And yet you have yet to provide any data that would convince a reasonable person that those four sources are not quality. I'm still waiting on the basic middle school level diagram of the story you shared that proves it is counter to basic quality expository writing.
 
#3,196
#3,196
AshG said:
And yet you have yet to provide any data that would convince a reasonable person that those four sources are not quality. I'm still waiting on the basic middle school level diagram of the story you shared that proves it is counter to basic quality expository writing.
Click to expand...
tenor.gif
 
#3,200
#3,200
AshG said:
Based on what standardized metric? Or is that just your opinion/feeling?
Click to expand...
I asked you the same thing.

I've consistently seen all those sources brush over or completely ignor the same stuff they spent days, weeks, months going after Trump for. I don't need some leftist think tank to tell me what is legitimate and what's not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top