TheColdVolTruth
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2013
- Messages
- 1,752
- Likes
- 1,603
Dont't run away now...I wanted to hear your views. Sure oil is a commodity and a nation uses it's commodity leverage as much as possible. There is a reason we we spent so much blood and treasure in the ME for decades.
Sure, COVID negatively impacted national production basis demand and COP. Actually, the cut by SA is a boost to the higher production cost in the US...at this time, but benefits them with more revenue now that our spigot is being squeezed and lagged production and politcal directives. The danged dance of we need u but we control how you protect us.
My point being that long term there is nothing good with decreasing your ability to manipulate such a vital ecomomic commodity. SA has decades of experience and we are handing it away.
I certainly wouldn't have to run away from a geriatric like you. I could walk, and you'd never catch me (that's a joke for your 'kid' remark).
The first post of mine to which you replied was directed to someone who posted an article projecting a 12% increase in gas prices and he said, " Biden administration....plain and simple." In other words "blue man bad". I pointed out that global oil prices, and thus gas prices, are not plain and simple. That's where you jumped in.
I don't know what views of mine you want to hear. If it is specific to this thread, my views are the greatest cause to the recent 10 to 15 cent spike in gas prices is the production cut by SA. I say that because I was watching the WTI ticker during that OPEC meeting and saw the spike in real time when the cut was announced. Anyone blaming this price spike on Biden is lazy and looking for a scapegoat, in my opinion.
More broadly, I think Biden will be bad for the energy sector. I disagree with him on Keystone XL. Hell, I disagree with him on most of his views, but I think his impact is more limited by global factors than many seem to.
I think most are in agreement that he will not be friendly to the oil and gas industry, but I think he will also be bad for alternatives/renewables. From an equities standpoint, I think there will certainly be winners in this sector, but he will have his thumb too heavily on the scale which will cause inefficiency long term. It is my view that the market should dictate innovation and hold corporations accountable based on their performance. GM announced a target of 2035 to phase out gas and diesel vehicles. I applaud them for making that known and believe the market should hold them accountable. If you believe in that strategy, invest in GM and buy a Chevy. If you don't, find other options. My concern is the Biden administration will incent or punish based on regulating this progression. Our best innovations come out of hunger rather than comfort. The gov intervening gives too much comfort to corporations by providing a backstop to poor performance.
Back to oil, I don't see anything yet that makes me think we have reduced our ability to impact the market. We're at an inherent disadvantage in that SA production is profitable in the high teens. Our shale producers range from the 40's to 90's. We have a large amount of production currently capped due to economics (supply glut and diminished demand) rather than gov intervention. When the economics make sense, many of those wells can, and will, come back online.
We need to see consolidation in our oil industry to reduce production costs. We should sell every drop we can profitably while there is still a market. the landscape will look very different in 20-40 years. I think we have most likely already passed our peak oil demand as a nation with the move toward EVs and the transition to telecommuting. I also think that we are approaching our peak demand globally. China and other EMs still trend upward, but they are mandating EVs which should turn that trend downward.
Just my two cents.